Marxism is all about picking winners and losers when it comes to businesses.

For fools like you, Hitler is a socialist.
he called himself one but that did not make him one.

The fact is the only fool is the one defending socialism Quaddafis cersion of socialism is precisely what made Libya into the mess it is, not capitalism you ******* moron
 
The fact is the only fool is the one defending socialism Quaddafis cersion of socialism is precisely what made Libya into the mess it is, not capitalism you ******* moron
NATO's aggression brought Libya to its current state.
As for the “version of socialism,” how do you like the “version of capitalism” in Bangladesh or Haiti, for example? Or is that also a “version of socialism”?
 
NATO's aggression brought Libya to its current state.
As for the “version of socialism,” how do you like the “version of capitalism” in Bangladesh or Haiti, for example? Or is that also a “version of socialism”?
Yes moron

Learn a little of history Haiti IS a failed socialist state

You really are a ******* fool
 
Learn a little of history Haiti IS a failed socialist state
Not bad, if something goes wrong in a capitalist state, it's immediately socialism. I guess the Great Depression is also socialism's fault... Live and learn.
 
Not bad, if something goes wrong in a capitalist state, it's immediately socialism. I guess the Great Depression is also socialism's fault... Live and learn.
Those were not capitalist states you dumbass that is the point
 
Fascism is merely an overt form of capitalist dictatorship (just one of the methods used to control the bourgeois state).
Eradicating fascism as such is like treating a runny nose when you have the flu without fighting the virus itself. The runny nose will return sooner or later.
 
Capitalism today is the rule of super-rich ghouls, who measure their existence by the frequency and intensity of dopamine rushes.
 
Ask your boss for a raise, and he’ll say he can’t afford it.
Form a union, and he’ll spend millions fighting you.
 
15th post
What catastrophe did Lenin predict at the highest stage of capitalism?

Under capitalism, the goal of production, as we know, is not human need, but profit.
The capitalist is forced to expand production, introduce machines, reduce costs, and produce ever more goods.

But there's a contradiction: workers are paid less than the value of what they create; otherwise, there would be no profit.

A strange situation emerges: goods are becoming more plentiful, while the purchasing power of most people grows much more slowly, if at all. Sooner or later, the system faces the situation where there's simply no one to buy the goods. Crisis sets in, bankruptcy, unemployment, and a decline in production.
But then something even more important happens.

The development of capitalism and competition destroys small businesses, and the economy is increasingly controlled by giant monopolies and finance capital.

Vladimir Lenin called this stage imperialism, that is, the highest stage of capitalism, when the largest corporations and banks begin to compete not just for the domestic market, but for resources, colonies, and spheres of influence around the world.

And when the world's greatest powers divide it up, it inevitably leads to global conflicts.

Lenin wrote that imperialism makes wars between great powers practically inevitable.
It was the struggle between imperialist powers that caused two world wars, so the question remains: if capitalism continues to develop according to this logic, it will lead to new conflicts and the involvement of ever new players again and again.

What Lenin didn't realize was that the level of catastrophic consequences of imperialist domination would reach the point of threatening the very existence of all humanity as a result of the arms race...

Well then, fans of capitalism, enjoy your stinking system while you live.
 
Back
Top Bottom