Mark Kelly to face military tribunal. Nuremberg 2.0 is beginning.

[MarathonMike]

Certainly will not be this week, if ever. Cutting an order to bring the O6/24 back to active duty would not even have a report date of this week, starting his approx $10,125/month military salary, he would be receiving in addition to his salary as a sitting US Senator. Then there is the matter of Article 32 investigation Officer appointments, scheduling at the convening authority, selection and appointment of Defense counsel, preparation time, and that is just to get to the article 32 investigation sessions to determine charges, if any, for stating military regulations. Then there is the written report and recommendations, and that is even before courts-martial trial (if warranted) can be scheduled, set up and convened. Most likely outcome is in this case is lots of publicity, while he draws a chunk of change with free legal representation.
Get your popcorn, this ought to be fun!

How many millions have the Democrats pissed away on the Mueller investigation, J6, Impeachment 1 and 2 etc.? All of a sudden taxpayer money matters, huh interesting.

 

[j-mac]

Like I said, you don't have any shred of evidence of your idiotic lie. No argument, either. Nothing but what the fat rapist told you to think.

We neither have to prove anything to you, nor do we have to argue with you either, because the fact of the matter is that you are a nothing in the equation these days...No power. No brains. and forever wrong in your predictions...In fact all you have are name calling, and narcissistic bullshit....You are worthless to even comment to.

 

[Marener]

Keep up that losing prediction record...It fits you so well...

Like when you predicted the courts would overturn the 2020 election?

Your track record on prosecuting your political enemies is absolutely abysmal. It’s embarrassing how often you guys get excited about prosecuting someone and it never happens.

 

[White 6]

18 U.S.C. § 2387 addresses activities affecting the armed forces generally. It states that anyone who intends to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States can be subject to legal penalties. This section was updated to include the "Air Force" in recognition of its establishment as a separate branch of the armed services in 1947. For the full text and details, you can refer to the U.S. Government Publishing Office or Cornell Law School.

Not charged in the military. Military charges and trials are based on military regulations. You never heard of the Uniform Code of Military Justice? Sorry.
How many years did you say you served, and what was your rank?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We neither have to prove anything to you

I would never ask you halfwits to prove your idiot lies. I said he doesnt have any evidence. How could he possibly prove it, since he has no evidence? Damn you're dumb.

 

[Independent thinker]

Will Kelly sing?

No. But there are many others over the years not having anything at all to do with Kelly.

 

[White 6]

How many millions have the Democrats pissed away on the Mueller investigation, J6, Impeachment 1 and 2 etc.? All of a sudden taxpayer money matters, huh interesting.

Beats me. Robert S. Mueller III, was a decorated Marine Captain. Why bring him up? Are you going to push for him to be recalled to Active Duty in the Marines to go through the process? Good luck.
While you are at it, there is nothing I am guilty of, but would love some more Active Duty pay, though recall does not add to retirement points, post retirement. Have them do an Article 32 investigation session on me, too.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The funniest thing here is that the Secretary of the Navy is an even bigger joke than Hegseth is. His only qualification for that post was having raised money for Trump.

 

[cnm]

He directed thousands of soldiers to disobey valid commands because he did not like the commands

So in Chump's regime unlawful commands are valid commands?

Seems about right.

 

[cnm]

Trump wants tribunals and will get them

Oh I will enjoy those.

 

[j-mac]

Like when you predicted the courts would overturn the 2020 election?

I did? post it for me would you?

Your track record on prosecuting your political enemies is absolutely abysmal.

"My political enemies"? I wasn't aware I was prosecuting anyone....

It’s embarrassing how often you guys get excited about prosecuting someone and it never happens.

Who's "you guys"?

 

[j-mac]

Not charged in the military. Military charges and trials are based on military regulations. You never heard of the Uniform Code of Military Justice? Sorry.

1. I gave you a federal statute.

2. You're saying he can't be charged under the UCMJ? You'd be wrong.

"Yes, Mark Kelly can be charged under the UCMJ. As a retired Navy captain and eligible for retirement pay, he remains under UCMJ jurisdiction for life, unless Congress changes the law or he is removed from the retired list. The Pentagon has initiated a review of his recent public comments, which may lead to potential charges under the UCMJ, including the possibility of recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings."

How many years did you say you served, and what was your rank?

Not that it's your business, I served 6 years. From '82 to '88. I ETS'd as an E5 Sargent....

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Oh I will enjoy those.

China Balloon Kelly has sold America out

 

[candycorn]

Mark Kelly is a traitor and needs to be held accountable for treason.

He will to sing to avoid prison. Traitors don't do well there.

If Americans fail to hold their traitors accountable while they have the chance. When the traitors regain power they will quickly collapse America and enslave its population.

Who else will get caught up in this?

Fake news

 

[White 6]

1. I gave you a federal statute.

2. You're saying he can't be charged under the UCMJ? You'd be wrong.

"Yes, Mark Kelly can be charged under the UCMJ. As a retired Navy captain and eligible for retirement pay, he remains under UCMJ jurisdiction for life, unless Congress changes the law or he is removed from the retired list. The Pentagon has initiated a review of his recent public comments, which may lead to potential charges under the UCMJ, including the possibility of recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings."

Not that it's your business, I served 6 years. From '82 to '88. I ETS'd as an E5 Sargent....

I am not wrong. He could be charged under a corresponding military regulation, in a military Courts Martial, if there is one, but it would be under military rules, in a military trial, not a Federal Jury trial. If you want a Federal jury trial, you will simply have to demand he be charged in Federal Court. You will simply have to choose. You cannot have it both ways. Problem is, if you go the military route, you are automatically screwed, as those sitting in judgement are sworn to support the Constitution and military law, where a civilian jury is not, and every single Officer in judgement will already know the military regulations, so you're truly fkd, not only losing big in public, but paying him an extra $10,000 plus a month, while he double dips. Do what you like, just don't expect much.
My Grandaughter goes into the Marines in February. I will admit right here, I and her aunt, the Colonel told her the same thing, in feel free to have me recalled, also, and will be glad to spend the bucks, even if it does effect Social Security. Besides, I always like free travel, and it would be interesting duty, knowing the outcome.

 

[WEATHER53]

Not when they are a liar.

Time for you to get a life lesson
They look just like an accident

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Time for you to get a life lesson
They look just like an accident

 

[WEATHER53]

So in Chump's regime unlawful commands are valid commands?

Seems about right.

Who and when ruled them unlawful?

 

[WEATHER53]

You are right
Tears will find you

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who and when ruled them unlawful?

A judge. Weeks ago. Pay attention!