Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??The Constitution is set up that way, if you don't like it, ask for an Amendment.Kinda like a president that is given the victory through the Electoral College and not by popular vote..Every state that voted on this voted AGAINST same sex marriage, so your side STOLE your victory, just like you STOLE victory with Roe v. Wade.
But that's not the same as the Supreme Court consistently taking the liberal side of great social issues and refusing to allow the American people to have any input.
Abortion and same sex marriage is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, so the Supreme Court exceeded its lawful authority in deciding on these issues.
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??The Constitution is set up that way, if you don't like it, ask for an Amendment.Kinda like a president that is given the victory through the Electoral College and not by popular vote..Every state that voted on this voted AGAINST same sex marriage, so your side STOLE your victory, just like you STOLE victory with Roe v. Wade.
But that's not the same as the Supreme Court consistently taking the liberal side of great social issues and refusing to allow the American people to have any input.
Abortion and same sex marriage is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, so the Supreme Court exceeded its lawful authority in deciding on these issues.
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??The Constitution is set up that way, if you don't like it, ask for an Amendment.Kinda like a president that is given the victory through the Electoral College and not by popular vote..
But that's not the same as the Supreme Court consistently taking the liberal side of great social issues and refusing to allow the American people to have any input.
Abortion and same sex marriage is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, so the Supreme Court exceeded its lawful authority in deciding on these issues.
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
Go for it Weasel. I'm sure that you can drum up lots of support for that idiotic ideaIt's time for government to get out of the marriage business. Make a contract with however you want, no state recognition.
Such a legit source there.That is "tens" Not tens of thousands. TENS!! These people need to just give it up and get a life.
March For Marriage Draws Tens, But Promises Ultimate Victory Over Obergefell | Right Wing Watch
There has to be something really wrong with them!!The National Organization for Marriage has struggled in recent years to populate its annual anti-marriage-equality March for Marriage, with especially dismal turnout last year for the first march since the Supreme Court effectively made marriage equality the law of the land. But this year’s march reached a new low, as waning enthusiasm for the cause and what NOM president Brian Brown said were scheduling and permit troubles combined to produce a crowd of about 50.
And this is really absurd!! Comparing this to the fight for abolition!! To civil rights!!!!
Brown told the crowd not to be discouraged by their small numbers, comparing their cause to that of abolitionists in the 18th and early 19th century.
“We are on the side of truth,” he said. “We are on the side of true human rights, we are on the side of true civil rights
Two guys marrying is idiotic. It defies nature. But why oppose my idea?Go for it Weasel. I'm sure that you can drum up lots of support for that idiotic ideaIt's time for government to get out of the marriage business. Make a contract with however you want, no state recognition.
The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??The Constitution is set up that way, if you don't like it, ask for an Amendment.
But that's not the same as the Supreme Court consistently taking the liberal side of great social issues and refusing to allow the American people to have any input.
Abortion and same sex marriage is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, so the Supreme Court exceeded its lawful authority in deciding on these issues.
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
It is SparkySuch a legit source there.That is "tens" Not tens of thousands. TENS!! These people need to just give it up and get a life.
March For Marriage Draws Tens, But Promises Ultimate Victory Over Obergefell | Right Wing Watch
There has to be something really wrong with them!!The National Organization for Marriage has struggled in recent years to populate its annual anti-marriage-equality March for Marriage, with especially dismal turnout last year for the first march since the Supreme Court effectively made marriage equality the law of the land. But this year’s march reached a new low, as waning enthusiasm for the cause and what NOM president Brian Brown said were scheduling and permit troubles combined to produce a crowd of about 50.
And this is really absurd!! Comparing this to the fight for abolition!! To civil rights!!!!
Brown told the crowd not to be discouraged by their small numbers, comparing their cause to that of abolitionists in the 18th and early 19th century.
“We are on the side of truth,” he said. “We are on the side of true human rights, we are on the side of true civil rights
Right Wing Watch is a project of People For the American Way (PFAW) dedicated to monitoring and exposing the activities and rhetoric of right-wing activists and organizations in order to expose their extreme agenda. Our researchers monitor dozens of broadcasts, emails and websites, and use their expertise on right-wing movements to analyze and distill that information for media, allies and the general public. By shedding light on the activities of the right-wing movement, we help expose the risks its extreme and intolerant agenda presents to our country. We do not endorse the views of groups that we report on.
People For the American Way is a progressive advocacy organization founded to fight right-wing extremism and defend constitutional values including free expression, religious liberty, equal justice under the law, and the right to meaningfully participate in our democracy. You can learn more about PFAW’s work on our website at www.pfaw.org.
This site may also include postings by our affiliate People For the American Way Foundation and will be so designated.
The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has been the basis for many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups.The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
That is a theory advanced by the right . In reality it extends the entire bill of rights to the states who must abide by it on a wide range of issues. If the 14th was soused to be limited to race, it would have said so.The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.Did they also take the liberal side in Citizens United??
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
The people should have been allowed to decide this issue, however, also abortion. It's not a real victory if you have to steal it.The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has been the basis for many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups.The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!Citizens United was a ruling based on the First Amendment, which is actually a part of the Constitution.
Abortion and same-sex marriage is not.
More bigoted bovine excrement. It is not about sex anymore than heterosexual marriage I about sex. It is about families that are the cornerstone of our society an same sex couples have families and d o all the same things as other people . Your ignorance is coming through quite clearly.Two men having sex or two women having sex does nothing for society, so society is under no obligation to provide resources to the promotion or maintenance of same-sex marriage.
You're becoming a bore.The people should have been allowed to decide this issue, however, also abortion. It's not a real victory if you have to steal it.The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has been the basis for many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups.The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!
So you want the Dred Scott decision reinstated?The people should have been allowed to decide this issue, however, also abortion. It's not a real victory if you have to steal it.The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has been the basis for many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups.The Fourteenth Amendment was written to address racial discrimination. It was never intended to apply to categories based on sexual orientation.No Shit!! I do GOTCHA because Obergefell WAS ALSO BASED ON THE 14th!! Holy shit! You don't know that?No, you don't got me. Loving v. Virginia was based on the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires that the states provide equal protection of the laws.You seem to be avoiding the issue of Loving v Virginia raised and for good reason. You can't be against it because that would make you sound racist. can't be for it because it is based same legal principles as Obergefell. Gotcha!!
Dear child..."right wing watch" is not a legit source.It is SparkySuch a legit source there.That is "tens" Not tens of thousands. TENS!! These people need to just give it up and get a life.
March For Marriage Draws Tens, But Promises Ultimate Victory Over Obergefell | Right Wing Watch
There has to be something really wrong with them!!The National Organization for Marriage has struggled in recent years to populate its annual anti-marriage-equality March for Marriage, with especially dismal turnout last year for the first march since the Supreme Court effectively made marriage equality the law of the land. But this year’s march reached a new low, as waning enthusiasm for the cause and what NOM president Brian Brown said were scheduling and permit troubles combined to produce a crowd of about 50.
And this is really absurd!! Comparing this to the fight for abolition!! To civil rights!!!!
Brown told the crowd not to be discouraged by their small numbers, comparing their cause to that of abolitionists in the 18th and early 19th century.
“We are on the side of truth,” he said. “We are on the side of true human rights, we are on the side of true civil rights
Right Wing Watch is a project of People For the American Way (PFAW) dedicated to monitoring and exposing the activities and rhetoric of right-wing activists and organizations in order to expose their extreme agenda. Our researchers monitor dozens of broadcasts, emails and websites, and use their expertise on right-wing movements to analyze and distill that information for media, allies and the general public. By shedding light on the activities of the right-wing movement, we help expose the risks its extreme and intolerant agenda presents to our country. We do not endorse the views of groups that we report on.
People For the American Way is a progressive advocacy organization founded to fight right-wing extremism and defend constitutional values including free expression, religious liberty, equal justice under the law, and the right to meaningfully participate in our democracy. You can learn more about PFAW’s work on our website at www.pfaw.org.
This site may also include postings by our affiliate People For the American Way Foundation and will be so designated.
Gays make babies? That's usually what happens when opposite genders get together.More bigoted bovine excrement. It is not about sex anymore than heterosexual marriage I about sex. It is about families that are the cornerstone of our society an same sex couples have families and d o all the same things as other people . Your ignorance is coming through quite clearly.Two men having sex or two women having sex does nothing for society, so society is under no obligation to provide resources to the promotion or maintenance of same-sex marriage.
Children of homosexual couples are more likely to be homosexual and gender confused themselves.More bigoted bovine excrement. It is not about sex anymore than heterosexual marriage I about sex. It is about families that are the cornerstone of our society an same sex couples have families and d o all the same things as other people . Your ignorance is coming through quite clearly.Two men having sex or two women having sex does nothing for society, so society is under no obligation to provide resources to the promotion or maintenance of same-sex marriage.
