jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,639
- 30,085
- 2,180
That’s a fast pony^ Wooooooooooooooosh!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s a fast pony^ Wooooooooooooooosh!
Not if you’re orange man badDo lawyers normally get to witness FBI searches?
Bullshit. How do you prove materials were planted by the FBI when the FBI waited until you were out of town, then insisted on absolutely NO witnesses and even wanted all cameras in the house turned off? Much like your saying all election fraud has been debunked yet cannot say WHO debunked it, how, when or where, then denying all evidence to the contrary. If the FBI didn't want controversy, they should have done things better.
There is legions of evidence against Hillary, including the statements of her guilt by the head of the FBI himself.
What criminal behavior? Because the FBI broke into his house and went through Melania's panty drawer?
Prove all the documents came from there?The cameras weren't turned off. That's a lie Trump claimed only for a little while.
If they don't have access then they have no basis for making the claim the FBI planted anything.Exactly how are they supposed to do that when they haven't had any access to the documents since the raid?
.
47 empty foldersIf they don't have access then they have no basis for making the claim the FBI planted anything.
Soooo, what you’re saying is, it is easy to plant evidence?Do lawyers normally get to witness FBI searches?
If they don't have access then they have no basis for making the claim the FBI planted anything.
Like I said If they don't have access then they have no basis for making the claim the FBI planted anything.Perhaps you should use all those years of over priced indoctrination you claim to have and see if you can gain an understanding of what the phrase "may have" means. Oh, here's a little hint in case that is too much of a challenge. Get yourself a dictionary and look up the definition of "speculation". Actually you commies should already know the definition since you do soooooooo much of it.
.
Like I said If they don't have access then they have no basis for making the claim the FBI planted anything.
^ Continuing not to get it.That’s a fast pony
Says the pony^ Continuing not to get it.
Ahhhh....Yet you commie freaks do the exact same thing all the time, hypocrite much?
.
Ahhhh....
The old whataboutism pivot.
You're done.
Night night.
"Fact"Poor thing, do inconvenient facts trouble you?
.
Unfortunately most cases don't have such personal contact with a judge. This is a special case, with a special master, who can ask the parties where they stand.Mar-a-Lago special master orders Trump team to back up any claims of FBI 'planting' evidence
The special master overseeing the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation has ordered former President Donald Trump's lawyers to back up out-of-court assertions that the FBI may have planted evidence at the property during their search last month.edition.cnn.com
This to me is what should happen to all who spout out false claims and disinformation.
Have a judge compel them to make a statement under oath, to show proof of their allegations.
Let’s try this again. Excluding the Cheeto, do lawyers normally observe FBI searches?Not if you’re orange man bad
Do lawyers normally observe FBI searches?Soooo, what you’re saying is, it is easy to plant evidence?
I have no idea? That’s not so easy to answer, how many raids have you been to?Let’s try this again. Excluding the Cheeto, do lawyers normally observe FBI searches?
Do lawyers normally observe FBI searches?
^ The Pony Express of WHOOOOOOOSH!Says the pony
And Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation too. We know because US intelligence officers told us so and they NEVER lie. Not Knowingly!From the three-judge (including TWO TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGES) ruling laughing Cannon's bullshit out of the water:
"Trump has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents".
Funny, that reminds me of the time Rudy had to admit to a judge that the "rigged election" case wasn't actually about fraud.