What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Manmade climate change predictions are a bust

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
104,511
Reaction score
13,588
Points
2,210
Location
Michigan
So you disagree that the earth's landmass and ocean configuration wasn't responsible for the transition from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet? That's odd. Why do you believe the planet has been cooling for the past 50 million years?
That may be all true. Doesn’t change the fact China, Europe, Africa, Mexico, Australia, India,Middle East Canada and USA ar3 causing climate change with all our manufacturing.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
104,875
Reaction score
17,031
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
That may be all true. Doesn’t change the fact China, Europe, Africa, Mexico, Australia, India,Middle East Canada and USA ar3 causing climate change with all our manufacturing.
Incorrect. If you had said urban heat island effect and deforestation that would have been more correct.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
104,875
Reaction score
17,031
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
5% of the scientific community agrees with him. They are usually scientists who’ve let politics play too much a role in their lives.

Did you hear about this new third party? They don’t have a position on any issue. They will do what the public wants. The majority of Americans.

Two examples.

1. most Americans want abortions to be legal. So that will be their position on that.

2. Most people understand man made climate change is real. So ding and nuts like him would matter not to them.
“The very idea that science best expresses its authority through consensus statements is at odds with a vibrant scientific enterprise. Consensus is for textbooks; real science depends for its progress on continual challenges to the current state of always-imperfect knowledge. Science would provide better value to politics if it articulated the broadest set of plausible interpretations, options and perspectives, imagined by the best experts, rather than forcing convergence to an allegedly unified voice” (Sarewitz 2011).

Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus by the IPCC on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
104,875
Reaction score
17,031
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
5% of the scientific community agrees with him. They are usually scientists who’ve let politics play too much a role in their lives.

Did you hear about this new third party? They don’t have a position on any issue. They will do what the public wants. The majority of Americans.

Two examples.

1. most Americans want abortions to be legal. So that will be their position on that.

2. Most people understand man made climate change is real. So ding and nuts like him would matter not to them.
Claire Parkinson, climatologist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, said, "many scientists who don’t buy into the “mainstream” position on climate change are reluctant to voice their opinions" Claire Parkinson
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
No quotes from Al anywhere in your reference. Just right wing hack jobs giving opinions. Now, what does NASA say ? How about AAAS, the largest association of scientist…..what do they say ?
Naw, guilty by associating with the experts, hahaha
 

Dagosa

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
9,665
Reaction score
2,345
Points
198
Naw, guilty by associating with the experts, hahaha
The experts as opposed to made up shit from delusional idiots. Your source of info are school drop outs and criminals. Guilt by association.
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
104,511
Reaction score
13,588
Points
2,210
Location
Michigan
Claire Parkinson, climatologist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, said, "many scientists who don’t buy into the “mainstream” position on climate change are reluctant to voice their opinions" Claire Parkinson
I agree with your previous post. All the great discoveries proved consensus wrong. Good point.

But your scientists bullshit has to get scrutinized. So right wing scientists are cowards? Why? They are financially backed by corporate global polluters
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
104,875
Reaction score
17,031
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
But your scientists bullshit has to get scrutinized.
Of course, but so does your scientists bullshit, right?
So right wing scientists are cowards? Why? They are financially backed by corporate global polluters
It wasn't right wing scientists she was talking about.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
20,210
Reaction score
3,215
Points
290
Location
N/A
I agree with your previous post. All the great discoveries proved consensus wrong. Good point.

You people so do not get it. The great discoveries replaced an old consensus with a new consensus. To say that mainstream science believes X to be true is simply to say that there is a consensus supporting X. You people are SO stupid.
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
104,511
Reaction score
13,588
Points
2,210
Location
Michigan
You people so do not get it. The great discoveries replaced an old consensus with a new consensus. To say that mainstream science believes X to be true is simply to say that there is a consensus supporting X. You people are SO stupid.
Yea but evidence is submitted to the scientific community for scrutiny. If not them who?
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
The experts as opposed to made up shit from delusional idiots. Your source of info are school drop outs and criminals. Guilt by association.
Experts that are not
 

Dagosa

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
9,665
Reaction score
2,345
Points
198
Experts that are not
NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.
They don’t agree with you
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.
name those experts.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
NASA, AAAS all 3400 plus accredited universities.,
YOU HAVE TROUBLE READING ?
I just asked for those with climate skills. But as always, you failed.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
122,374
Reaction score
22,629
Points
2,180
Why not ? Only stupid people woukd diss 95% of the smartest people and listen to Fix News.
95%? the fact you typed it is hilarious. how many scientists are in your percentage? It could be 90 people and 85 agree, but there are 30,000 actual scientists. hmmmmmmmmm you fell of the cliff son.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top