Manmade climate change predictions are a bust

[sealybobo]

So you disagree that the earth's landmass and ocean configuration wasn't responsible for the transition from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet? That's odd. Why do you believe the planet has been cooling for the past 50 million years?

That may be all true. Doesn’t change the fact China, Europe, Africa, Mexico, Australia, India,Middle East Canada and USA ar3 causing climate change with all our manufacturing.

 

[ding]

That may be all true. Doesn’t change the fact China, Europe, Africa, Mexico, Australia, India,Middle East Canada and USA ar3 causing climate change with all our manufacturing.

Incorrect. If you had said urban heat island effect and deforestation that would have been more correct.

 

[ding]

5% of the scientific community agrees with him. They are usually scientists who’ve let politics play too much a role in their lives.

Did you hear about this new third party? They don’t have a position on any issue. They will do what the public wants. The majority of Americans.

Two examples.

1. most Americans want abortions to be legal. So that will be their position on that.

2. Most people understand man made climate change is real. So ding and nuts like him would matter not to them.

“The very idea that science best expresses its authority through consensus statements is at odds with a vibrant scientific enterprise. Consensus is for textbooks; real science depends for its progress on continual challenges to the current state of always-imperfect knowledge. Science would provide better value to politics if it articulated the broadest set of plausible interpretations, options and perspectives, imagined by the best experts, rather than forcing convergence to an allegedly unified voice” (Sarewitz 2011).

Given the many valid dissenting scientific opinions that remain on these issues, recent attempts to force an apparent scientific consensus by the IPCC on these scientific debates are premature and ultimately unhelpful for scientific progress.

 

[ding]

5% of the scientific community agrees with him. They are usually scientists who’ve let politics play too much a role in their lives.

Did you hear about this new third party? They don’t have a position on any issue. They will do what the public wants. The majority of Americans.

Two examples.

1. most Americans want abortions to be legal. So that will be their position on that.

2. Most people understand man made climate change is real. So ding and nuts like him would matter not to them.

Claire Parkinson, climatologist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, said, "many scientists who don’t buy into the “mainstream” position on climate change are reluctant to voice their opinions" Claire Parkinson

 

[jc456]

No quotes from Al anywhere in your reference. Just right wing hack jobs giving opinions. Now, what does NASA say ? How about AAAS, the largest association of scientist…..what do they say ?

Naw, guilty by associating with the experts, hahaha

 

[Dagosa]

Naw, guilty by associating with the experts, hahaha

The experts as opposed to made up shit from delusional idiots. Your source of info are school drop outs and criminals. Guilt by association.

 

[sealybobo]

Claire Parkinson, climatologist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, said, "many scientists who don’t buy into the “mainstream” position on climate change are reluctant to voice their opinions" Claire Parkinson

I agree with your previous post. All the great discoveries proved consensus wrong. Good point.

But your scientists bullshit has to get scrutinized. So right wing scientists are cowards? Why? They are financially backed by corporate global polluters

 

[ding]

But your scientists bullshit has to get scrutinized.

Of course, but so does your scientists bullshit, right?

So right wing scientists are cowards? Why? They are financially backed by corporate global polluters

It wasn't right wing scientists she was talking about.

 

[Crick]

I agree with your previous post. All the great discoveries proved consensus wrong. Good point.

You people so do not get it. The great discoveries replaced an old consensus with a new consensus. To say that mainstream science believes X to be true is simply to say that there is a consensus supporting X. You people are SO stupid.

 

[sealybobo]

You people so do not get it. The great discoveries replaced an old consensus with a new consensus. To say that mainstream science believes X to be true is simply to say that there is a consensus supporting X. You people are SO stupid.

Yea but evidence is submitted to the scientific community for scrutiny. If not them who?

 

[jc456]

The experts as opposed to made up shit from delusional idiots. Your source of info are school drop outs and criminals. Guilt by association.

Experts that are not

 

[Dagosa]

Experts that are not

NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.

 

[jc456]

NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.

They don’t agree with you

 

[Dagosa]

They don’t agree with you

Funny, I use them as reference….dah.

 

[jc456]

Funny, I use them as reference….dah.

why?

 

[jc456]

NASA, the AAAS and 3400 universities and climate research facilities are not experts ? . Only a half wit would go under surgery to a non expert and only a half wit would look for reasons to doubt the expert institutions about AGW.

name those experts.

 

[Dagosa]

name those experts.

NASA, AAAS all 3400 plus accredited universities.,
YOU HAVE TROUBLE READING ?

 

[Dagosa]

why?

Why not ? Only stupid people woukd diss 95% of the smartest people and listen to Fix News.

 

[jc456]

NASA, AAAS all 3400 plus accredited universities.,
YOU HAVE TROUBLE READING ?

I just asked for those with climate skills. But as always, you failed.

 

[jc456]

Why not ? Only stupid people woukd diss 95% of the smartest people and listen to Fix News.

95%? the fact you typed it is hilarious. how many scientists are in your percentage? It could be 90 people and 85 agree, but there are 30,000 actual scientists. hmmmmmmmmm you fell of the cliff son.