Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg funded by anti-American extremist Soros

[Rumpole]

It is a politically motivated malicious prosecution.

Vacuous accusation offered without substance or foundation. Comment dismissed.

The Corrupt Democrat Party practices banana republic politics.
The Democrat Politicians exploit the hate and ignorance of their crazy cult.

Nice rant, but rants, if that is the salient part of your comment, which it is, it does not merit a thoughtful response.

If you want to debate issues, and are serious about it, I'd be happy to engage.

But rants are not interesting, and are a fool's errand insofar debating goes.

But who can take you seriously with a moniker like 'TroglocratsRdumb'?

I rest my case.

 

[Rumpole]

So? A politically motivated prosecution can still yield convictions.

Vacuous insinuation offered without evidence. Comment dismissed.

But if that same prosecutor’s office chooses not to prosecute someone (say a liberal Democrat’s Administration official), then there won’t be any conviction since there is no prosecution.

Since Truman, we've had Republicans Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, HW Bush, G Bush, and Trump. Plenty of opportunity to indict criminal Democrats (if they exist). so, one of the two are true:
1. Republicans are incompetent for letting Dems get away with crimes.
2. Republicans are, indeed, committing the vast majority of crimes.

But, in truth, Republicans in the White House are committing the vast majority of Crimes. Nixon had watergate, Reagan had Iran Contra, Trump had, well, we know what he had, lots of criminals surrounding him (so much for 'the very best people). As for Bill Clinton and Hillary, it was whitewater, a couple of indictments/convictions. AS for 'Benghazi' four years and 8 investigations and they couldn't find anything to pin on her.

The fact is that Republicans in the White House committed the bulk of the crimes, and you just can't handle that truth.

No no. I have seen plenty of corruption and criminality. Things like what President Potato bragged about in getting a Ukrainian prosecutor fired;

Debunked, utterly.

GOP senator says he doesn’t remember signing 2016 letter urging ‘reform’ of Ukraine prosecutor’s office

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told reporters Thursday he did not recall signing a letter urging reforms in the office of the Ukrainian prosecutor President Trump has alleged former Vice President Joe B…

thehill.com

““The United States, the European Union, the I.M.F., and Ukraine’s leading reform figures were all pressing for Viktor Shokin to be removed from office because he was one of the biggest obstacles to fighting corruption in the entire country. This was a bipartisan goal in Congress as well.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden–Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

The conspiracy theory alleges that then-Vice President Biden withheld loan guarantees to pressure Ukraine into firing a prosecutor to prevent a corruption investigation into Burisma and to protect his son. The United States did withhold government aid to pressure Ukraine into removing the prosecutor, in accord with the official and bipartisan policy of the federal government of the United States. The US government, along with the European Union, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, believed the prosecutor to be corrupt and ineffective and too lenient in investigating companies and oligarchs, including Burisma and its owner. A January 2018 video shows Biden taking credit for withholding the loan guarantees to have the prosecutor fired, acting to implement bipartisan US policy rather than for the reasons the conspiracy theory alleges.

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story

www.independent.co.uk

Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story


Republicans wanted Shokin removed, as well:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/23/gops-hunter-biden-report-doesnt-back-up-trumps-actual-conspiracy-theory-or-anything-close-it/

(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the “whole world” agreed he wasn’t doing a good job.)

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/03/politics/gop-senators-echoed-biden-on-ukraine-reforms-kfile/index.html

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story

www.independent.co.uk

Wayback Machine

web.archive.org

Factchecking republican lies

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/30/fact-checking-first-trump-biden-presidential-debate/

(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the “whole world” agreed he wasn’t doing a good job.)

[...]

Viktor Shokin was appointed to the position of Prosecutor General of Ukraine by Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko, whom he was loyal to. Representatives of the EU and the United States pressed Poroshenko for his removal[21] as did the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.[22] In March 2016 testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, former ambassador to Ukraine John E. Herbst stated, "By late fall of 2015, the EU and the United States joined the chorus of those seeking Mr. Shokin's removal" and that Joe Biden "spoke publicly about this before and during his December visit to Kyiv". During the same hearing, assistant secretary of state Victoria Nuland stated, "we have pegged our next $1 billion loan guarantee, first and foremost, to having a rebooting of the reform coalition so that we know who we are working with, but secondarily, to ensuring that the prosecutor general's office gets cleaned up." An overwhelming majority vote in the Ukrainian Parliament in March 2016 led to Shokin's removal from office after an investigation into extortion of another company led to associates who were found in possession of diamonds, cash and other valuables[24] as well as documents and passports belonging to Shokin.

things like what Shrillary did with her emails and devices, etc etc etc.

No evidence of criminal activity. only 3 of her emails were marked with a C, for 'confidential'. No prosecutor will indict a former Secretary of State, former First lady, on such scant evidence. The claim that there were over 100 classified docs is an opinion rendered after the fact, and the docs were not so marked. A good defense attorney will shred this point on cross.

I don’t care who you end discussions with. You need to learn something. You’re not significant.

BackAgain, with due respect, that is what you call a meaningless point.

Also, finally, I’m not saying that none of the prosecutions brought by the deep state DOJ were invalid. Maybe they were all valid. What I am saying is that partisan political considerations go into who gets prosecuted.

See above under the 'rationalization'.

Ironically, that chart is indirect evidence of that.

Explain.

 

[BackAgain]

Vacuous insinuation offered without evidence. Comment dismissed.

If that’s the standard, you have no hope here. And, face facts. It’s already clear you have no hope here.

I’ll translate your comment: you have no honest rejoinder so you choose instead to lie and run away. I’ve got your number already. Didn’t take long.

By the way, your posts are far too verbose. Not good. Not accurate. Not worthwhile. Just long winded.

 

[busybee01]

WASHINGTON — The chairmen of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees on Monday demanded that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg hand over documents and testify about “what plainly appears to be a politically motivated” prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote to the Democratic Manhattan DA that his plans to charge Trump would be “an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority.”

House wants NY DA Bragg to answer for ‘politically motivated’ Trump case

Republican leaders call possible Trump charges “an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority.”

nypost.com

How billionaire George Soros funded DA Alvin Bragg with $1million​

How billionaire George Soros funded DA Alvin Bragg with $1million

Alvin Bragg received more than $1million in funding from the Color Of Change political action committee, which was funded by billionaire George Soros.

www.dailymail.co.uk

5 hours ago · Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is one of at least 75 liberal district attorneys who have received millions in funding from George Soros-backed political …

Cities Will Set Murder Records Because of 'Soros Effect'​

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/12/...

Soros-backed DAs in major U.S. cities have instituted brazenly lax enforcement policies that have helped unleash an unprecedented wave of crime across urban America.

Comment:
Should Alvin Braggs resign for taking donations from the anti-American extremist George Soros?
Soros has said that working for the Nazis was a "happy exhilarating experience" and he also said that he "had no feelings of guilt".
Soros is funding the Democrat DAs who are releasing violent criminals onto the public.
This is why we are seeing this crime surge.
He is getting innocent Americans killed.
Are Democrats incapable of feeling shame?
BTW, Soros is "fact checked" by left wing media and Big Tech cleanses the web of criticism of him.

The Republican Party are anti-America extremists.
Trump Republicans love Vladimer Putin and they are the Nazis.
Crime is rising the fastest in red states.
George Soros is the GOP boogeyman.
Clearly you received the GOP talking points.

Braggs should open a investigation of McCarthy and these GOP chairmen for obstruction of justice and attempting to intimidate a public official. Every GOP e-mail should be subpoenaed.

 

[dudmuck]

So? A politically motivated prosecution can still yield convictions. But if that same prosecutor’s office chooses not to prosecute someone (say a liberal Democrat’s Administration official), then there won’t be any conviction since there is no prosecution.

No no. I have seen plenty of corruption and criminality. Things like what President Potato bragged about in getting a Ukrainian prosecutor fired; things like what Shrillary did with her emails and devices, etc etc etc.

I don’t care who you end discussions with. You need to learn something. You’re not significant.

Also, finally, I’m not saying that none of the prosecutions brought by the deep state DOJ were invalid. Maybe they were all valid. What I am saying is that partisan political considerations go into who gets prosecuted. Ironically, that chart is indirect evidence of that.

 

[busybee01]

Crime is very unpopular with mainstream Americans.
This will be an issue in the 2024 election.

Crime is the biggest problem in red states not blue states.

 

[busybee01]

Or, maybe, his legacy will be that he helped repair the GOP.

No it will be how he turned the GOP into a lawbreaking party.

 

[BackAgain]

No kidding. We don’t expect a deep state politically corrupted justice system to actually deliver Justice.

 

[busybee01]

No, because the whole intent is to smear Trump, and that is what they are doing.
It is a malicious prosecution.

You are so full of BS. The horse that kicked you in the face apparently knocked your brains out as well.

 

[busybee01]

The fact is that the Democrats are on the side of the criminals.
They defunded the police, and they elected far left extremist DAs.
The high crime areas in the 'red states' are in the Democrat parts.

The fact is that Republicans are the criminals.
Republicans want to defund the federal police.
Republicans run red states not Democrats.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[busybee01]

the next POTUS will be a republican ... your party doesnt even want the current POTUS to run again !

Americans will not elect fascists for President. That eliminates Republicans.

 

[busybee01]

You are accusing others of that which you do.

You are doing a good job of that.

 

[BackAgain]

No it will be how he turned the GOP into a lawbreaking party.

Nah. You’ve confused the GOP with the Democrap Parody.

 

[BackAgain]

You are doing a good job of that.

Nah. Once again, you’ve allowed your irrationality to lead you to a stupid shithead assertion.

Were you dropped by the doctor at birth or did you just have a couple of lobotomies?

 

[multivita-man]

No, because the whole intent is to smear Trump, and that is what they are doing.
It is a malicious prosecution.

Well good, because Trump is the shit stain that has been smeared all over America.

 

[dudmuck]

No kidding. We don’t expect a deep state politically corrupted justice system to actually deliver Justice.

 

[BackAgain]

Yeah yeah. You’re a bit behind. He long since acknowledged that he was wrong to say that, as he was.

Now because of a deep state political persecution, he has learned the hard way how wrong he was.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]