DA Alvin Bragg Releases Migrant Taxi Driver Charged for Repeatedly Assaulting Female Passengers

[JoeB131]

I agree, let's get the files out there and then see what they say, instead of just making it up as we go.

And Guffrie already said she never saw trump do anything wrong.

Well, she's not saying anything because she's dead.

 

[JusticeHammer]

You mean like this?

Floyd wasn't a victim, he was a thug.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Ideology. To Joey, all leftists are infallible. Anyone to the right of Saul Alinsky is a Nazi.

Wait what.

That's a lie. The issue was accusation constituting guilt, trial by lynch mob. (You, of course, SUPPORT that...as long as it's not your ox getting gored.)

None whatsoever. Joey is a Stalinist...he has wet dreams of murdering his opponents, staging show trials and witch hunts, and actually endorses HUMAN TRAFFICING. There is no depth to which he will not sink.

Do a search about willing rape victims and find the thread. It's an eye opener.

 

[JoeB131]

Floyd wasn't a victim, he was a thug.

No, he was some poor schlub who got strangled in the middle of the street for accidentally passing off a fake bill.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do a search about willing rape victims and find the thread. It's an eye opener.

It might be time to report Joey to the FBI. His posts in that thread are, quite simply, disturbing.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I don't know what the story was, and neither do you.

Thank you! You finally admitted it!

What I do now is a room full of career prosecutors looked at the case they had and decided they didn't want to put it in front of 12 jurors, because they'd probably think the same thing I did.

The driver was able to plead down to a lesser charge and the woman wasnt even made aware of it. I fact, the website if her lawyer says the woman was kept in the dark about various aspects of the case and had to chase down answers.

There was another alleged victim as well.

Braggs apparent soft in crime stance allowed this guy to plead down, and was allowed to start driving a cab again.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Well, she's not saying anything because she's dead.

She already said it

 

[AZrailwhale]

No, he was some poor schlub who got strangled in the middle of the street for accidentally passing off a fake bill.

No, he was a violent thug with a long crimnal record.
"
George Floyd had a documented criminal history that included multiple arrests and convictions primarily for drug-related offenses and a significant robbery charge.

Key​

1. Aggravated Robbery (2007): Floyd was involved in a home invasion where he and several accomplices entered a woman's home, held her at gunpoint, and stole items. He was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison, serving four years before being paroled in 2013.
   
   2
2. Drug Possession and Theft Charges: Between 1997 and 2005, Floyd faced several arrests for drug possession, theft, and trespassing. Notably, he was convicted of possessing crack cocaine in 2004 and served time for various drug-related offenses.
   
   2
3. Total Arrests: Floyd was arrested multiple times, with records indicating at least eight convictions, including charges for theft and drug possession. His criminal record includes five arrests over a span of about 20 years.
   https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=da9f...uYWwtcGFzdC1yZWNvcmQtYXJyZXN0LzIwMTc3Lw&ntb=1
   From Felonfriendly.com:
4. "
   

   Timeline of Key Charges and Convictions​

   [TR]
   [th]Year[/th][th]Offense[/th][th]Type[/th][th]Outcome[/th]
   [/TR] [TR]
   [td]1997[/td][td]Theft[/td][td]Misdemeanor[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]1998[/td][td]Possession of cocaine (less than 1g)[/td][td]Felony[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]2001[/td][td]Criminal trespass[/td][td]Misdemeanor[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]2002[/td][td]Possession of cocaine (less than 1g)[/td][td]Felony[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]2005[/td][td]Possession of cocaine (more than 1g)[/td][td]Felony[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]2007[/td][td]Aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon[/td][td]Felony[/td][td]Convicted[/td]
   [/TR]
   [TR]
   [td]2009[/td][td]Sentenced to 5 years in prison[/td][td]—[/td][td]Served time until 2013[/td]
   [/TR]
   Notably, the 2007 robbery involved a home invasion in which Floyd was alleged to have entered a home with several men, one of whom pointed a gun at a woman. Floyd accepted a plea deal and served time."

 

[JusticeHammer]

No, he was some poor schlub who got strangled in the middle of the street for accidentally passing off a fake bill.

You have no idea it was accidental. You just don't want to admit the lefts hero was a thug.

 

[JoeB131]

The driver was able to plead down to a lesser charge and the woman wasnt even made aware of it. I fact, the website if her lawyer says the woman was kept in the dark about various aspects of the case and had to chase down answers.

There's no obligation to inform victims on case progress.

Braggs apparent soft in crime stance allowed this guy to plead down, and was allowed to start driving a cab again.

No, what allowed him to plead down was it was a shit case.

No, he was a violent thug with a long crimnal record.
"
George Floyd had a documented criminal history that included multiple arrests and convictions primarily for drug-related offenses and a significant robbery charge.

For which he served his time.

You don't murder a man in the street for something he did 15 years earlier (which you didn't know about, anyway.)

 

[ThisIsMe]

There's no obligation to inform victims on case progress.

https://www.nycourts.gov/courthelp/criminal/crimeVictimsRights.shtml

Manhattan Taxi Sexual Assault: Why We're Suing After DA Bragg Failed Our Client

When DA Bragg's office allowed a sexual assault case to result in no jail time and failed to communicate with the victim, we took action. Learn how civil litigation protects victims' rights when prosecutors won't.

kontageorges.com

This would seem to indicate they are entitled to be informed.

No, what allowed him to plead down was it was a shit case.

I dobt see that in any of the articles ive read. Do you have the publication from where you got that?

For which he served his time.

You don't murder a man in the street for something he did 15 years earlier (which you didn't know about, anyway.)

 

[Polishprince]

No, what allowed him to plead down was it was a shit case.

What made it a "shit case" was that the perp was a member of a socially friendly group to the left.

If the fellow who was suspected was a white, Judeo-Christian heterosexual, the case would have been pressed to the max.

 

[JoeB131]

This would seem to indicate they are entitled to be informed.

Why, because some Shyster says so? I'm sure as long as she keeps paying them, they'll claim anything.

I dobt see that in any of the articles ive read. Do you have the publication from where you got that?

Case was plead down, because they didn't want to put Drunk Party Girl on the stand.

What made it a "shit case" was that the perp was a member of a socially friendly group to the left.

If the fellow who was suspected was a white, Judeo-Christian heterosexual, the case would have been pressed to the max.

Actually, only 3% of rape cases see prison time, we've been over this. And this wasn't even a rape.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Why, because some Shyster says so? I'm sure as long as she keeps paying them, they'll claim anything.

A law firm? Has to be a shyster huh? Smh....

And the second link, that shows the new york victim rights?

Case was plead down, because they didn't want to put Drunk Party Girl on the stand.

So you're assuming. Bragg has a history of soft on crime. This was just another example of that.

They couldn't have plead down because they didnt want to put a drunk girl on the stand because there was no evidence she was drunk, something that might have come out if they had a trial.

Actually, only 3% of rape cases see prison time, we've been over this. And this wasn't even a rape.

Never said it was rape, said it was sexual assault.

 

[JoeB131]

So you're assuming. Bragg has a history of soft on crime. This was just another example of that.

He gets 88% of his cases to plead out to some kind of punishment, I'd hardly call that soft. Soft would be dismissing everything.

This wasn't dismissed. It was plead down

They couldn't have plead down because they didnt want to put a drunk girl on the stand because there was no evidence she was drunk, something that might have come out if they had a trial.

2 AM. People aren't stupid. They'll draw their own conclusions.

 

[Polishprince]

He gets 88% of his cases to plead out to some kind of punishment, I'd hardly call that soft. Soft would be dismissing everything.

This wasn't dismissed. It was plead down



2 AM. People aren't stupid. They'll draw their own conclusions.

2AM, probably a scrub woman cleaning up for a liberal's office, and going home for the night to her tenement.

 

[JoeB131]

2AM, probably a scrub woman cleaning up for a liberal's office, and going home for the night to her tenement.

No, she was out partying with friends.

You think millenials have a job the next day?

 

[ThisIsMe]

He gets 88% of his cases to plead out to some kind of punishment, I'd hardly call that soft. Soft would be dismissing everything.

This wasn't dismissed. It was plead down



2 AM. People aren't stupid. They'll draw their own conclusions.

Unfortunately, people inferring something doesnt prove anything. There have been many people who have spent nights out on the town and not drink a drop of alcohol.

 

[JoeB131]

Unfortunately, people inferring something doesnt prove anything. There have been many people who have spent nights out on the town and not drink a drop of alcohol.

You seem to forget how our legal system works. It's not the job of the Cabbie to prove he's innocent, it's the job of the prosecutor to prove he's guilty.

And if a jury might infer she was shitfaced drunk at 2 AM makes that a much higher hill to climb.

 

[Polishprince]

You seem to forget how our legal system works. It's not the job of the Cabbie to prove he's innocent, it's the job of the prosecutor to prove he's guilty.

And if a jury might infer she was shitfaced drunk at 2 AM makes that a much higher hill to climb.

Why would a jury infer that?

The victim is entitled to a presumption of innocence.


The liberal concept that broads "deserve" to be raped if they have a few adult beverages has to be done away with