I notice that you totally ignored Steele's testimony in libel court! Don't want to admit that the entire dossier is nothing more than lies piled on top of lies...do you? Put Steele under oath in a court of law and his entire story changes. So explain to me why the FBI never put Steele under oath and asked him what in the dossier was factual? How can you use something as the basis for FISA warrants without even doing the most basic investigation into it's veracity?
steele has no obligation to do anything. he cannot be put under oath by anyone because he is not an american. HOWEVER, the intel the FBI has already, was also the same info in the dossier. & the FISA warrant get renewed or rejected every 90 days after review. it will get renewed if more related intel comes to light. which it did.
the dossier.
Taking a closer look at the 'Steele dossier' and Carter Page's warrant
By
Allison Graves on Friday, January 5th, 2018 at 3:57 p.m.
[...]
Our ruling
Foley said James Comey and news reporting showed the basis of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant for Carter Page was "all based on a dossier."
This is not accurate. CNN and the
New York Times never reported that the dossier was the basis for Carter’s probe. CNN reported that it "part of the justification" and the
New York Times didn’t even mention the dossier.
We couldn’t find any evidence that proved Comey suggested that Page’s warrant was "all based on a dossier." According to CNN’s unnamed sources, Comey has cited the dossier, but has not confirmed publically how much of it has been verified.
Taking a closer look at the 'Steele dossier'