Street Juice
Platinum Member
Haha, you are just seething, huh?Wrong. And that he hate whitey whining does you no good. I have read plenty and we are talking about America and not Africa. American racial history did not end when slavery ended son. Learn that. This thread is not about slavery boy. It is about modern white racism whereby a white man felt he had the right to stop a black man and question him while he was doing his job. Slavery doesn't have a damn thing to do with this, neither does rural african pygmy tribes and modern slavery that goes on in Europe just as much as Africa.The Civil War was about ending slavery. Period. White-hating, America-hating mediocrities such as yourself refuse to admit it, but it is true. Had slavery not existed in the United States, the war would not have been fought. Read the Lincoln-Douglas debates in the run-up to the 1860 presidential election. They are ALL about slavery. The Missouri compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were battles over slavery. The original Declaration of Independence included a condemnation of slavery that was removed only because the southern colonies refused to join the revolution against England if it remained. White Christian countries in Europe and the United States were the first nations in history to outlaw slavery on moral grounds. In Africa, slavery still exists. In parts of black Africa, pygmies and bushmen are still enslaved and even hunted for food. Your blind hatred of whites leaves you foaming at the mouth, endlessly posting your ignorant venom-filled tripe here.More excuses. You point out that slaves were illiterate. It was made against the law for blacks to read and write. A slave could be killed for having that ability. The civil war was not about about freeing blacks and blacks died fighting in that war. There is no other example of that happening because there is no example of that happening at all except in the imagination of white supremacist excuse making bastards like you. So while your post wants to excuse things, you need to be more accurate in your opinions.I suppose almost all our laws are written to give our group advantages. Our highway safety laws, for example, are written for the benefit of Americans. Brazilians are not entitled to the safety advantages they provide. And Brazilian laws work the same way in reverse. So what?If there was a law I could have passed that would give me and others like me advantages that people not of our group were not entitled to, do you think that would be a good thing or a fair thing for me & my group? What about those not in our group?You're kind of a knucklehead, so you probably won't be able to grasp this, but here goes.That's because whites have a 243 year history of consistent racist behavior. The only white people really whining about being called racists are the whites who actually are racist.One of the many problems with the Great National Sin being "racism" is that, to the extent it can even be defined, it is misapplied, and, because it is an "ism", it can be asserted anywhere at any time against anybody. That's why the murderous, totalitarian, genocidal left loves it. It' like "enemy of the people". It doesn't require proof of any inculpatory action. Just the assertion is enough to justify execution, as history's most lethal group, the Bolsheviks, amply demonstrated.In normal times, a Type I error is ho hum, and doesn't even make the local news, and that's how it still is for all Type I errors EXCEPT when the person making the error is white and the subject of the error is black. Then it is national news.
It's not ho hum when a man is held against his will, regardless of why. But when racism is the reason the person is held, that makes it national news. Racists need to be publicly shamed and shunned.
Only complete idiots can't find a better reason to like a person or dislike a person, one that goes any deeper than their skin color.
You are a case in point. You see that the resident was white and the driver was black, and, presto, you KNOW that the motivating factor was "racism". Just as the Bolsheviks only needed to see that the prisoner was an artist to determine guilt and execute him, all you need to see is that resident was white to determine guilt. As Lenin famously said, all of history comes down to Who? Whom?
- Race is nothing more than a very large, very extended, slightly inbred family. That's it. Members of the same race are more related to each other than they are to any other members of any other race.
- Therefore, to call someone a racist is to call someone a familyist.
- And yes, I am more solicitous of my mother's well-being than any other mother's on earth. She is higher in my affections. I will contribute to her happiness before I will contribute to the happiness of any other mother, and I flat out love her more than any other mother on earth.
- So what? If I didn't put my mother first, I would be something of a monster, wouldn't I.
- Blacks put other blacks first. Jews put other Jews first. Chinese put other Chinese first. There's nothing wrong with that.
- It is only whites who think it's a sin to put other whites first.
- Everyone else knows down deep this whole "racism" thing is a huge scam being run on the people who created the greatest civilization in history in order to destroy them.
- Other than the whites themselves, the only people who really think racism is evil are the mediocrities such as yourself who've convinced themselves of it out of the need to blame their failure in life on somebody else.
In the United States many of our laws were written in order to exclude people African descent from the same benefits and privileges that whites enjoyed so to attempt to downplay the type of institutional racism that was legislatively woven into U.S. law and society would require willful ignorance to ignore, in my opinion.
Many of our laws were not "written to exclude blacks". There were some exceptions, I suppose, like the famous Jim Crow laws. For a short time. In only a few states. And, for the most part, the Jim Crow laws were how our ancestors addressed the problem of black crime. But those laws haven't existed for a very long time. Yet we're still getting beaten up about them, and the white people who put an end to them are never thanked.
It's like slavery. Everybody was in on the African slave trade. African warlords captured Africans and sold them to Arab slavers who drove them to the coast where they were put on ships financed by Jews and taken to South America, where Jews and Europeans used them for labor. A small percentage came to North America. Slavery had existed for 300 years in North America already when the United States was born, and it only took less than a third of that amount of time for Americans to get rid of it--even though it cost us a horrific and bloody war of brother against brother for the benefit of members of another race. There is no other example of anything like that in world history. Then, it only took another hundred years to have the descendants of these illiterate slaves standing as full citizens with the majority--the wealthiest, most educated, most influential, most creative population of African descent anywhere in the world.
But instead of recognizing this glorious achievement by both black and white Americans, so many blacks today are willing to snipe from the corners about the 'willful ignorance" of white people and the "institutional racism" of white people in exchange for their pats on the head from their Jewish controllers--the George Soroses and the New York Times et al.
Except for Louis Farrakhan, blacks don't see what the Jews have in store for them.
You are a ignorant son of a bitch. Stay in the rubber room.
