Anyone that thinks a model is evidence has been in a coma for 3 years.
As per usual "The ScienceTM" does not provide the IFR they used to draw these conclusions, nor their hospitalization rates; their vaccine efficacy rates are based on "published estimates", but they don't bother to cite either the data or their sources for those "published estimates." With this utter lack of transparency in terms of inputs they could spit out literally any number they chose.
This is exactly the same shit "methodology" they used to scare the AF out of people at the beginning of all of this, with real world results that were equally poor in terms of accuracy and disastrous for millions.
Nor does it mention that it is merely an updated version of this paper, which predicted that the "vaccines" had saved 2,265,222 through March:
This study finds that without the U.S. vaccination effort, there would have been 2.2 million additional COVID-19 deaths and 17 million more hospitalizations.
www.commonwealthfund.org
Now the number is 3,255,656. So, they predict that in the last 8 months the "vaccines" saved
990,434 lives, during omicron, for which the shot is nearly useless after a few weeks/couple of months and which has a relatively low IFR.
Bull. Shit.
There are a host of other problems with this absurdity, but why bother. It's nothing but another propaganda piece based on some shit model put out to support a narrative. I've seen better 'science' at a high school science fair.
Stop believing these people, especially when crucial inputs are clearly missing. They've been blatantly lying to your faces for 2.5 years exactly like this, ffs.