MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

more bullshit. What is the FBI "on?" You couldn't support your claim, so you spewed a pile of weaseling and diversion.

 

[monkrules]

Why arent any of the "insurrectionists" getting charged with insurrection?

They are looking at charging Seditious Conspiracy

Why not Treason? Or Blaphemy?

The new GOP definition of blasphemy is speaking against Trump. The Trump mob didn't do that...they chanted his name in reverence like they are supposed to.

The Trump mob will be charged as appropriate for the crimes they committed. Some with assault, some with "trespassing" and maybe some with Seditious Conspiracy.

Are the maggots capable of understanding why they are being brought to trial?

 

[Correll]

Bullshit. When it happens, you people kneejerk with all the "adulting" of a fucking zygote.

Sure, sure, sure. Because a single man laying on the ground surrounded by 4 cops with handcuffs behind his back was as much of a threat as dozens and dozens of violent protestors crashing through a barricaded door just outside a room full of Congress people.

Funny, an adult prepared to deal with complex issues, would recall that there have been many other examples far less clear cut than that one, that yet got the same response from you lefties.


So, right there, you just demonstrated your hypocrisy and proved me right. Zygote.

 

[Mustang]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

more bullshit. What is the FBI "on?" You couldn't support your claim, so you spewed a pile of weaseling and diversion.

They're on the CASE, skippy.

 

[freyasman]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

The 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack was in fact a serious and real threat to our democracy; that those on the dishonest, reprehensible refuse to acknowledge this fact is likewise a threat to our democracy.

Really? It is funny then, how people like candy, make fun of the idea that there will be any possible pushback from all their aggressive actions.


I mean, you people are supposed so afraid of us, because we are so violent and wacist and just a few months ago, made a real play for power.


Yet, you are going full bore after us, with no consideration or concern for your personal danger, which I guess is just incredible bravery on your part,

BUT, also no concern for the collateral damage, to others.


That is irresponsible at best. If half the country is really so aggressive and dangerous, surely you should be handling this more carefully.

Hell, I recall how seriously you people took it, when someone was burning Korans, and you people were concerned that it was risking a backlash.


Now? It is almost as though you just don't care about the danger.


Why is that?

Yes, really.

The 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack was intended to overthrow the will of the people, destroy our democratic institutions, and abandon Constitutional governance.

I accepted that as your position in the previous post. My point was how you libs lack of concern about possible future threats from the right, if you believe that, do not make sense.


Are you purposefully being obtuse, or are you really in such a deep state of denial that you could not see my actual words on the screen?


YOU ARE HOLDING COMPLETELY CONTRADICTORY BELIEFS AT TEH SAME TIME.

Threats from the right?

You guys have been promising some sort of civil war for about 20 years now.

What's stopping you? You're not a chickenshit coward are you? LOL...of course you are.

If that's true, then how is "white supremacy" such a threat? (As you all keep claiming in order to justify your continued persecution of anyone to the right of Mao. )


If conservatives are all cowards, then what is the "threat"?

If they are actually dangerous, then why are you not concerned for your own safety?











Can't have it both ways if you're being honest...... but honesty isn't something you have ever been burdened with, is it?

She won't address your point. She will pretend to miss it and just spam talking points.

I know.


They're all full of shit.

 

[bripat9643]

Bullshit. When it happens, you people kneejerk with all the "adulting" of a fucking zygote.

Sure, sure, sure. Because a single man laying on the ground surrounded by 4 cops with handcuffs behind his back was as much of a threat as dozens and dozens of violent protestors crashing through a barricaded door just outside a room full of Congress people.

Thousands of people throwing Molotov cocktails and cans of soup at the police are not a threat.

 

[Mustang]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

 

[colfax_m]

Funny, an adult prepared to deal with complex issues, would recall that there have been many other examples far less clear cut than that one, that yet got the same response from you lefties.

Your attempt to point out hypocrisy would be a little more impressive if the exact same critique could be pointed out about your hypocrisy.

But go ahead and give me another example you find illustrative.

 

[Faun]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

Here, you need this.

You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?

Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.

This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.

So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.

"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.

Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.

Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.

You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.

They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.

Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.

Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid.

The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.

At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.

Support For Black Lives Matter Surged During Protests, But Is Waning Among White Americans

The recent protests against police brutality are some of the largest and most widespread in American history. An estimated 15 million to 26 million Americans ha…

fivethirtyeight.com

Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.

Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests

Posts on Facebook claim that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has failed to condemn Antifa, the left-wing anti-fascist movement whose followers have used aggressive tactics including physical confrontations to intimidate groups they deem authoritarian or racist...

www.reuters.com

Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?

No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.

Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....

Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’

This is where the libtard shows us that everything he says is shit, because the fact that he was just proved wrong, won't bother him at all.

LOL

Feel free to prove it with a legit news source.

I know you won't because you can't.

Feel free to prove that CNN or the Washington Post are legitimate news source.

Fucking moron, what do they have to do with this? I didn't reference either one of them. I sourced an AP article which showed she donated nothing.

Your own article demonstrates that... aside from the sensationalized headline, quote it saying she herself donated money.....

AP was just exposed harboring Hamas terrorists in its Gaza offices. CNN or the Washington Post are the kind of sources you generally cite. You believe AP is a "legit" news source. You just proved what a gullible fool you are.

That wasn't an AP building, ya fucking moron. It was a building the AP worked out of. Along with Al Jazeera and others. So no, the AP was not exposed to harboring terrorists. If there were indeed Hamas terrorists in that building, it could have been anyone working out of that building harboring them. It could have been the AP or it could have been another tenant.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to quote your own article, aside from the sensationalized headline, saying Harris donated money.....

I know you won't because you can't because it doesn't say what you're claiming. And that's YOUR article.

 

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

more bullshit. What is the FBI "on?" You couldn't support your claim, so you spewed a pile of weaseling and diversion.

They're on the CASE, skippy.

That isn't what I asked, bonehead.

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

And when you are asked to prove that 800 people have been charged, you change the subject.

That's the sure sign of a liar.

 

[Correll]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

 

[Correll]

Funny, an adult prepared to deal with complex issues, would recall that there have been many other examples far less clear cut than that one, that yet got the same response from you lefties.

Your attempt to point out hypocrisy would be a little more impressive if the exact same critique could be pointed out about your hypocrisy.

But go ahead and give me another example you find illustrative.

WHat hypocrisy of mine? Give it a shot, loser.

 

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

Here, you need this.

You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?

Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.

This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.

So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.

"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.

Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.

Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.

You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.

They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.

Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.

Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid.

The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.

At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.

Support For Black Lives Matter Surged During Protests, But Is Waning Among White Americans

The recent protests against police brutality are some of the largest and most widespread in American history. An estimated 15 million to 26 million Americans ha…

fivethirtyeight.com

Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.

Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests

Posts on Facebook claim that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has failed to condemn Antifa, the left-wing anti-fascist movement whose followers have used aggressive tactics including physical confrontations to intimidate groups they deem authoritarian or racist...

www.reuters.com

Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?

No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.

Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....

Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’

This is where the libtard shows us that everything he says is shit, because the fact that he was just proved wrong, won't bother him at all.

LOL

Feel free to prove it with a legit news source.

I know you won't because you can't.

Feel free to prove that CNN or the Washington Post are legitimate news source.

Fucking moron, what do they have to do with this? I didn't reference either one of them. I sourced an AP article which showed she donated nothing.

Your own article demonstrates that... aside from the sensationalized headline, quote it saying she herself donated money.....

AP was just exposed harboring Hamas terrorists in its Gaza offices. CNN or the Washington Post are the kind of sources you generally cite. You believe AP is a "legit" news source. You just proved what a gullible fool you are.

That wasn't an AP building, ya fucking moron. It was a building the AP worked out of. Along with Al Jazeera and others. So no, the AP was not exposed to harboring terrorists. If there were indeed Hamas terrorists in that building, it could have been anyone working out of that building harboring them. It could have been the AP or it could have been another tenant.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to quote your own article, aside from the sensationalized headline, saying Harris donated money.....

I know you won't because you can't because it doesn't say what you're claiming. And that's YOUR article.

It's the building where AP had its offices, shit for brains, and they were providing cover for Hamas. Otherwise they would have reported Hamas was in the building years ago. If you claim AP didn't know Hamas was there, then you admit that nothing AP reports can be trusted. Yet you just cited them.

Any way you look at it, you just proved you are a vast geyser of horseshit.

 

[colfax_m]

WHat hypocrisy of mine? Give it a shot, loser.

Oh, okay. Maybe not. Then I guess I can assume you were outraged when cops killed anyone that was unarmed and black too?

 

[Lesh]

I'm telling it to you. YOu support this violation of civil rights and you are an anti-American tyrant.

You have no "civil right" to smash your way into a government building, assault LEOs and attempt to stop the official proceedings of Congress

No less attempts to attack and or kidnap government officials (HANG MIKE PENCE!...Where ARE you Nancy....)

 

[Correll]

WHat hypocrisy of mine? Give it a shot, loser.

Oh, okay. Maybe not. Then I guess I can assume you were outraged when cops killed anyone that was unarmed and black too?

I want the same rules applied to the same situations. I would be happy with either tougher treatment of rioters across the board, OR treating the cop that "shot the unarmed woman" the way that you people generally would, if the dead woman was a violent black criminal shot by a white cop.


That is not hypocrisy on my part. That is the opposite of hypocrisy.

 

[Correll]

I'm telling it to you. YOu support this violation of civil rights and you are an anti-American tyrant.

You have no "civil right" to smash your way into a government building, assault LEOs and attempt to stop the official proceedings of Congress

No less attempts to attack and or kidnap government officials (HANG MIKE PENCE!...Where ARE you Nancy....)

Your pretending to be too retarded to understand teh concept of equal application of justice is dismissed.

 

[bripat9643]

WHat hypocrisy of mine? Give it a shot, loser.

Oh, okay. Maybe not. Then I guess I can assume you were outraged when cops killed anyone that was unarmed and black too?

The question is "why aren't you outraged about white men that were shot and killed by the cops?"

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, I actually think you care quite a bit what I and other people think.

Thanks for confirming that you're full of stupid thoughts lol.

 

[colfax_m]

I want the same rules applied to the same situations. I would be happy with either tougher treatment of rioters across the board, OR treating the cop that "shot the unarmed woman" the way that you people generally would, if the dead woman was a violent black criminal shot by a white cop.

Fantastic. Equal treatment for people in equal situations.

So remind me of the black unarmed person who was shot as they were part of a large violent mob trying to crash their way to a room with elected officials? That one escapes me.