Love It: Lawsuit Filed On Democratic Party For Them To Define If Obama Is Qualified

Don Black feels that the establishment of white pride as a special interest group within the Republican Party is a crucial strategy.[24] Asked by an interviewer for Italian newspaper la Repubblica if Stormfront was not just the new Ku Klux Klan, Black responded affirmatively, though he noted that he would never say so to an American journalist.[24]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Black_(white_nationalist)
 
It's no secret that Stormfront was started by a Ku Klux Klan leader.

burning_tea_party.jpg

Well, yes.

Did you know that presidents and a large part of the middle class in the 1910's into the 1920's were part of the klan. It was a large part of this country...Today whites are expected to hate our selfs and to give up our culture. As blacks and meso's push theirs within our schools and media.

Were there bad people within the klan, sure, but bad people are within every group. It is part of reality. Don Black cares about the survival of his race.

Rational people grow out of it. BTW, why is/was Don Black a member of the American Nazi Party? Also, why is Black banned from entering the United Kingdom?

Not people that are fighting for the survival of there race; seriously, what is so rational about allowing your people to go extinct. Same reason Michel Savage is banned from that marxist shit hole.:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
Well, yes.

Did you know that presidents and a large part of the middle class in the 1910's into the 1920's were part of the klan. It was a large part of this country...Today whites are expected to hate our selfs and to give up our culture. As blacks and meso's push theirs within our schools and media.

Were there bad people within the klan, sure, but bad people are within every group. It is part of reality. Don Black cares about the survival of his race.

Rational people grow out of it. BTW, why is/was Don Black a member of the American Nazi Party? Also, why is Black banned from entering the United Kingdom?

Not people that are fighting for the survival of there race; seriously, what is so rational about allowing your people to go extinct. Same reason Michel Savage is banned from that marxist shit hole.:eusa_whistle:

So, I guess both Black and Savage are on a terrorist watch list. Tea-Tard Republicans are scary...
 
USAR's arguments have been repeatedly debunked. The judge will rule against the plaintifs and order a fine for frivolous filing.

These arguments in this new suit have never been debunked. It's a new suit not towards Obama but about election qualifications and the procedures how they (DNC) determine a person is a natural born Citizen. This tactic is different.
 
Obama is a total imposter. In fact, he may not even be male...

Obama%20Sex%20Change.jpg


Would Thomas Jefferson tap that...?
 
Last edited:
USAR's arguments have been repeatedly debunked. The judge will rule against the plaintifs and order a fine for frivolous filing.

These arguments in this new suit have never been debunked. It's a new suit not towards Obama but about election qualifications and the procedures how they (DNC) determine a person is a natural born Citizen. This tactic is different.

The tactic is not based in law. Your plaintifs have no standing. The case will be dismissed. When it is, I will let everybody on this thread and you know by PM immediately.
 
USAR's arguments have been repeatedly debunked. The judge will rule against the plaintifs and order a fine for frivolous filing.

These arguments in this new suit have never been debunked. It's a new suit not towards Obama but about election qualifications and the procedures how they (DNC) determine a person is a natural born Citizen. This tactic is different.

The tactic is not based in law. Your plaintifs have no standing. The case will be dismissed. When it is, I will let everybody on this thread and you know by PM immediately.

Who has standing?
 
USAR's arguments have been repeatedly debunked. The judge will rule against the plaintifs and order a fine for frivolous filing.

These arguments in this new suit have never been debunked. It's a new suit not towards Obama but about election qualifications and the procedures how they (DNC) determine a person is a natural born Citizen. This tactic is different.

The tactic is not based in law. Your plaintifs have no standing. The case will be dismissed. When it is, I will let everybody on this thread and you know by PM immediately.

Tell me again why there is no standing? Give me point by point details. Here are the suits.Please back your claim up. I challenge you.

State Suit
http://www.scribd.com/doc/70566287/...onal-Committee-Obama-Eligibility-Complaint-TN

Federal Suit:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/70567010/...Committee-Obama-Eligibility-Complaint-Federal
 
Last edited:

Wong Kim Ark doesn't pertain to Obama when it comes to Article 2 Section 1. Minor vs Happersett does. A question for you Lakhota:

How can a person whose birth status was governed by the United Kingdom be considered a natural born citizen of the United States?

Please answer in detail.
 
How can a person whose birth status was governed by the United Kingdom be considered a natural born citizen of the United States?

Please answer in detail.

How can a person be born in a country their mother never set foot in?
Irrelevant. Even if Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a not a natural born Citizen but rather a statutory citizen. Therefore, he doesn't specifically meet the qualifications of Article 2 Section 1 like all other post grandfather clause presidents who were born to two U.S. citizen parents.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top