Louisiana starts requiring IDs to access porn on the positive internet

Giving up your ID to porn providers, what could go wrong?


In an effort to protect minors from accessing online pornography, Louisiana lawmakers have enacted a new law requiring age verification on adult websites.

Act No. 440, which went into effect on Jan. 1, will now require residents of the Bayou State to provide proof of their age with a government-issued ID or digital ID card before accessing online pornographic websites.
Top News June 1 !
Incest pregnancy in Loozeranner up 300%
 
I 100% support this.
I used porn blockers when raising the kids.
Most parents don't. And especially now that porn is absolutely disgusting and abuses young girls literally right out of high school.
It needs to be reigned in.

I have never even seen a porno. What is a porno and do you like watching them?
 
And just like that, 2/3 of internet traffic in LA seemed to cease overnight! :auiqs.jpg:
 
" Puritanical Cry Baby Psychopaths "

* Closet Faggot Moral Police *

And they have been conditioned by our toxic lib culture to be whores
Many dont but the weaker ones do
Provide proof that the availability of pornography on the internet is causing society to become dysfunctional .
 
" Creepy Hue Mammon Ape Behavior "

* No Need For Overlord Management Of Natural Tendencies To Avoid Weird Shit *

Have you ever watched a porno? I hear it is harmful to adults too.
I have seen very little pornography and have little interest in it and if there is a dong in it i would not watch it at all .

The interpersonal relationships about romance or sex between other individuals or characters , whether as reality or fantasy , is not of interest to me .

There is not a justification to disclose a permanent record of ones identity to third parties for whether one has or has not viewed porn ,
 
Last edited:
" Puritanical Cry Baby Psychopaths "

* Closet Faggot Moral Police *


Provide proof that the availability of pornography on the internet is causing society to become dysfunctional .
Strawman much?
Habitual viewing of porn is a rabbit hole leading to all kinds of dysfunction. Well studied and well documented.
1) Men preferring to masturbate over sex with their wives. Obviously leads to marital problems.
2) Young boys developing ED while attempting to have sex only. They have trained their brains to exclusively associate arousal with viewing porn.
3) Adult men having trouble ejaculating during vaginal sex, as well as struggling to maintain an erection, and having to masturbate in order to finish.

I can go on.
Just like anything else, too much of anything leads to trouble. Moderate use of porn is perfectly fine. Men want to have sex waaay more than women do. So viewing porn to get a little relief every once in awhile is good thing. But here is where the rabbit hole comes to play, generally using porn leads to more using of porn, which leads to over using porn which leads to the problems above and many others.
 
" Mistaking Me For Someone Who Gives A Shit "

* Mind Crime Police Worried About Sexual Control *

Strawman much?
Habitual viewing of porn is a rabbit hole leading to all kinds of dysfunction. Well studied and well documented.
1) Men preferring to masturbate over sex with their wives. Obviously leads to marital problems.
2) Young boys developing ED while attempting to have sex only. They have trained their brains to exclusively associate arousal with viewing porn.
3) Adult men having trouble ejaculating during vaginal sex, as well as struggling to maintain an erection, and having to masturbate in order to finish.

I can go on.
Just like anything else, too much of anything leads to trouble. Moderate use of porn is perfectly fine. Men want to have sex waaay more than women do. So viewing porn to get a little relief every once in awhile is good thing. But here is where the rabbit hole comes to play, generally using porn leads to more using of porn, which leads to over using porn which leads to the problems above and many others.
Oh , yeah , it sounds horribly dangerous to society , like sleepy drivers or blackout drunks .

So what is next , reinstatement of us 18th amendment for prohibition of alcohol because some have a tendency to become alcoholics ?

At which level of percent , at which level of dysfunction to society ?

An analogy of providing personal information to other private individuals to view porn would be that when individuals purchase alcohol their license information along with the volume and type of alcohol are permanently recorded by the store owner .
 
Last edited:
" Mistaking Me For Someone Who Gives A Shit "

* Mind Crime Police Worried About Sexual Control *


Oh , yeah , it sounds horribly dangerous to society , like sleepy drivers or blackout drunks .

So what is next , reinstatement of us 18th amendment for prohibition of alcohol because some have a tendency to become alcoholics ?

At which level of percent , at which level of dysfunction to society ?

An analogy of providing personal information to other private individuals to view porn , would be that when individuals purchase alcohol , their license information along with the volume and type of alcohol are permanently recorded by the store owner .
Again... strawman much?
 
" Definitely Legislators And Supporters Without Brains "

* Pointing To Reflections In The Mirror *

Again... strawman much?
The strawman is the basis for the bull shit legislation by sectarian moral supremacists trying to establish the relevance of their institutions of puritanism .
 
" Definitely Legislators And Supporters Without Brains "

* Pointing To Reflections In The Mirror *


The strawman is the basis for the bull shit legislation by sectarian moral supremacists trying to establish the relevance of their institutions of puritanism .
Strawman again.
Are you unable to discuss something without going to extremes?
 
" Who Started What Extremes "

* Mirror Mirror On The Wall *

Strawman again.
Are you unable to discuss something without going to extremes?
It was not myself whom took a trivial issue and turned it into a civil wrights violation by demanding individuals permanently tender personal information to third parties that do not have an entitlement to know in the first place .

Tracing its modern origin to a revival of the pre-modern official function of muhtasib (market inspector) by the first Saudi state (1727–1818), it was established in its best known form in 1976, with the main goal of supervising markets and public morality,[2] and was often described as Islamic religious police.[3]
 
Last edited:
" Who Started What Extremes "

* Mirror Mirror On The Wall *


It was not myself whom took a trivial issue and turned it into a civil wrights violation by demanding individuals permanently tender personal information to third parties that do not have an entitlement to know in the first place .
For one, I agree that it is a sad state of affair when the government has a need to step in because lazy, bad parents won't do their job.
The best scenario is parents using parental controls at the router level. Cheap, inexpensive and very easy to setup and use. VERY.
But few parents take the time to do it. Or even give it a passing thought that their son is likely viewing the worst debauchery available and forming his sexual attractions around it.
This law is extreme, but the problem is extreme. And too many parents are totally failing their own children to control it
 
This law is extreme, but the problem is extreme. And too many parents are totally failing their own children to control it
How is the problem more extreme? Why does mandating giving sensitive information to untrustworthy third parties a good thing? Weren't Republicans about free speech and small government? How is this any different than nanny state Democrats?
 
How is the problem more extreme? Why does mandating giving sensitive information to untrustworthy third parties a good thing? Weren't Republicans about free speech and small government? How is this any different than nanny state Democrats?
The law is highly unlikely to survive the courts. Know that.
I am for it for no other reason, knowing it will fail in courts, than to bring attention to the problem.
Porn isn't what it use to be. It has become the absolute sewer of mankind. The worst of everything.
Ideally parents do their job. But they flat out don't. Only 48% of parents use controls over their childs internet usage - BUT - that includes setting limits to playing video games. NOT actual parental controls. According to studies in 2020... only 16% of parents use software content filtering. Pathetic.
 
" Puritanical Cry Baby Psychopaths "

* Closet Faggot Moral Police *


Provide proof that the availability of pornography on the internet is causing society to become dysfunctional .
Mass murders on a monthly schedule by crazy people

Homo men hacking their penis off and calling themselves women

Liberal democrat ruled cites decriminalizing shoplifting
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top