No, I didn't say that. I don't thank you for being a childish liar.
Only a narcissistic moron (Democrat) would say the term "Black Hole" was first used, and later used the scientific community including everyone from Einstien to Hawking just to hurt black people's feelings.
Nobody said it was.. but here's the thing... we use the word "Black" to denote negative things.
Black Holes
Black Comedy
Black Hat Computer Hackers
and so on.
Says the self appointed protector of the downtrodden.
Get a life loser.
Hardly... you misrepresented why the change in what they were calling these fish were...
In fact, calling them Asian Carp was inaccurate, because not all the species actually came from Asia.
Here is what the MN-DNR posted on the subject.
http://www.seagrant.umn.edu/newslet...aring_up_the_carp_nomenclature_confusion.html
What should you call the four invasive carp species commonly grouped together? That answer depends on where you are.
Grass, black, bighead, and silver carp are native to Southeast Asia. The latter three species were introduced to fish farms in the southern United States and municipal sewage lagoons starting in the 1970s. Grass carp were released into southern waters to control invasive plants like hydrilla. Subsequent flooding and the escape of otherwise contained bighead and silver carp took many by surprise. Their spread has been alarming.
So why did Minnesota decide to switch-up Asian carp?
Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman sponsored a bill with the deliberate name change
because of concerns voiced from his constituents. St. Paul’s Asian-American community was unhappy with a sign placed near one of their popular fishing areas warning waterway users about spreading carp. They felt that the unwanted fish’s name unfairly cast a negative light on their community. Because the name change cost taxpayers virtually nothing and would positively impact the community, it was an easy decision to pass the bill. While Minnesota’s decision does not change what federal or other state regulators call carp that are not native to the U.S., it is a step toward simultaneously protecting Minnesota’s waters and honoring cultural inclusivity.