Will Trump's Petty, Personal Vendettas Feature His Criminality?

[HikerGuy83]

You should look up the definition of cult

When all else fails, result to this ^^^^

 

[HikerGuy83]

The whiny old fart's persecutions all fizzle.

But you seem obsessed with them.

We know stupid-fodder when we see it.

Which is why we let you obsess unhindered.

 

[Lockback]

And yours does not live in the same universe.


Most adults know when to breath.

Like Clinton, we don't inhale.

And we "never had sex with that woman".

And when they don't, as in the case of ICE where he is fullfilling a campaign promise, you are trying to run them over.

It must suck to be as conflicted as you appear to be.

Communists are always conflicted and confused. By definition, they're a mess.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Communists are always conflicted and confused. By definition, they're a mess.

This guy is well beyond that.

He hides under the skirt of the so-called global warming experts (many of whom are far from it), but can't defend the dogma himself.

You can almost see the strings attached to his arms, legs, and lips.

 

[Lockback]

This guy is well beyond that.

He hides under the skirt of the so-called global warming experts (many of whom are far from it), but can't defend the dogma himself.

You can almost see the strings attached to his arms, legs, and lips.

By God, you're right.
I can see it clearly now.

"Hi! I'm a Communist! I believe in the State determining everything in your life! Isn't that an exciting concept?!"

 

[schmidlap]

In the end, Trump, and not his targets for revenge, is and will remain the only one with a criminal record.

 

[schmidlap]

This guy is well beyond that.

He hides under the skirt of the so-called global warming experts (many of whom are far from it), but can't defend the dogma himself.

You can almost see the strings attached to his arms, legs, and lips.

I respect a consensus of qualified experts in all specialties of science and medicine over the dogma of ideologues in all cases, and I don't pretend to have expertise in any of them.

If I were to emphatically declare that raw pork is good for you, get a second opinion from someone who is qualified.

 

[Nostra]

I respect a consensus of qualified experts in all specialties of science and medicine over the dogma of ideologues in all cases, and I don't pretend to have expertise in any of them.

If I were to emphatically declare that raw pork is good for you, get a second opinion from someone who is qualified.

Pretty sure everyone here with a functioning brain immediately dismisses any of your emphatic declarations as complete bullshit.

 

[HikerGuy83]

I respect a consensus of qualified experts in all specialties of science and medicine

You worship it. You can only respect it if you have, at least, some level of understanding of the subject.

Which you don't.

over the dogma of ideologues in all cases, and I don't pretend to have expertise in any of them.

Or their superior understanding to yours. Most of you left wingers just say....well 97% blah blah blah blah and you have no clue what they are saying. We do have a clue that they've been pretty wrong in their careers, but why should that bother you. It's so funny, you accuse others (who attempt to understand it) of dogma, when in fact that is exactly what you are following. You are as blind as a bat.

And an idiot.

If I were to emphatically declare that raw pork is good for you, get a second opinion from someone who is qualified.

If the qualified individual said it was good for you, you'd eat it. And if people around you were dying and they continued to hold that it was good......you'd go right on eating it.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Pretty sure everyone here with a functioning brain immediately dismisses any of your emphatic declarations as complete bullshit.

Not so much bs and just the ramblings of an uneducated mind who bows to something they don't understand (and make no effort to do so).

ding would kick his ass in any kind of discussion.

 

[schmidlap]

​

Trump's tirades that are ALL CAP! primal screams on wee-hours social media become mealy-mouthed tantrums when they aspire to be actual litigation...

Biden was repeatedly accused of being a criminal mastermind (and a senile one to boot!) but no crimes were ever contrived with which to charge him.

The criminal (who has been convicted on 37 felony counts, and confirmed as a sexual abuser and as a business fraud in courts of law) is now hellbent on deploying his Justice Department to punish those whose official responsibilities included exposing evidence of his criminality.

How much will his vindictiveness serve to again dredge up all the confirmed evidence 0f his slimy turpitude?

Evidence appears to undercut claims against Letitia Jame​

DOJ's weak Comey indictment will unravel. ​

Jack Smith, Trump’s Target, Moves From Defense to Counterattack​

View attachment 1180478
View attachment 1180480
View attachment 1180481
View attachment 1180486

​

Does Trump want folks who were there to reminisce about his goons attacking the Capitol after he couldn't handle losing?

​

​

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is explicitly pointing his finger at Trump for helping to spur the attack on the Capitol by the outgoing president’s supporters.​

The Kentucky Republican said Tuesday on the Senate floor, “The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people.”​

​

​

As expected, Trump's Congressional flunkies failed to smear Jack Smith who used their inquisition to reconfirm the extensive evidence of the criminality of the whiny old fart:

​

...This nibbling around the edges by Republicans underscores the GOP’s lingering discomfort with Trump’s bid to subvert the election — an effort that preceded a violent attack on the Capitol by a mob of the president’s supporters. Several Republicans on the Judiciary Committee were among those who fled the rioters that day and condemned the violence at the time, and none at the hearing suggested Trump actually prevailed against Biden.​

The posture of committee Republicans Thursday also gave Democrats ammunition to claim that Republicans had no legitimate argument with the substance of Smith’s findings — both in the election interference case and in the case alleging mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.​

​

 

[Lockback]

In the end, Trump, and not his targets for revenge, is and will remain the only one with a criminal record.

A "criminal record" that has been completely ignored by the wise majority of American voters, who knew instinctively that those "crimes" where, in fact, not crimes at all, that the entire thing was a fraud to destroy Donald Trump ...

... and it failed.
Bigly.
It was an embarrassment, engineered by Far Leftists within the Democrat Party.

And you know what?

 

[schmidlap]

Jack Smith: I Stand By My Decision To Indict Trump, He Engaged In A Criminal Scheme To Overturn The Election​

Trump pushes Pam Bondi to investigate ‘deranged animal’ who prosecuted him​

The model of judicial temperament provoked infantile petulance. The hysterical convicted felon's tenacious butt barnacles are furious.

 

[Lockback]

Jack Smith: I'm a complete fraud and a political hack and I'm an embarrassment​

There.
I fixed it for you.

 

[schmidlap]

​

Will Trump's Petty, Personal Vendettas Feature His Criminality?​

​

​

Yes, Jack Smith refused to be confined to a private inquisition and used his public venue to detail the evidence against the whiny geezer before the public.

His other vendettas also fizzled, and they've concocted nothing against Mark Kelly, despite the shrill ululations of "Treason!"

 

[Lockback]

Yes, Jack Smith refused to be confined to a private inquisition and used his public venue to detail the evidence against the whiny geezer before the public.

His other vendettas also fizzled, and they've concocted nothing against Mark Kelly, despite the shrill ululations of "Treason!"

Mark Kelly is no traitor.


He is, however, a stinking pile of shit. What a worthless asshole.

 

[schmidlap]

Mark Kelly is no traitor.


He is, however, a stinking pile of shit. What a worthless asshole.

Ooooooo. Very snippy.

Yet another petty vendetta fizzles,

Grand jury refuses to indict Democratic lawmakers in connection with illegal military orders video​

 

[schmidlap]

Ooooooo. Very snippy.

Yet another petty vendetta fizzles,

Grand jury refuses to indict Democratic lawmakers in connection with illegal military orders video​

The whiny old kvetcher is on a roll!

After failing to "lock up" Hillary, James Comey, Letitia James, Mark Kelly, Jack Smith, ???, Trump remains the only convicted felon in the bunch.

Perchance, he could pleasure himself with voodoo dolls, and spare the taxpayer the tab for his petty vendettas.

​

 

[22lcidw]

Ooooooo. Very snippy.

Yet another petty vendetta fizzles,

Grand jury refuses to indict Democratic lawmakers in connection with illegal military orders video​

For now on I will always picture him with and cosmonaut spacesuit and a soviet flag emblem and CCCP written on it.