No. The work of the committee is necessary and appropriate so it can never be considered wrong by a fair minded unbiased democracy loving American.
That is not a fact, period.
The committee members have not done anything wrong in being on the committee so they will never have to admit they are wrong for being on the committee.
They are not required to do so.
Yes.
Yes.
Until you can cite the use of irrelevant and made up "facts" presented in the finding I will withhold judgment on such a scenario.
Yes, sufficiently capable.
No akready explained why.
Yes and No in that order. I believe they are honorable people specifically Kinzinger.
I Don’t agree with your predisposed conclusion before the Committee is barely getting started . Your judgment is already shown to be flawed when you question the subpoena to Bannon because you said he was no longer involved with the President. He was in the Willard Hotel on riot eve. You have discredited yourself on this subject
ThisIsMe. .
I’m certain they can because much of the case will undoubtedly be based on documented evidence and video recordings And because Cheney have put their careers and lives on the line to get to the truth for the country they love.
answered and I’m not interested in them finding Trump guilty.
No. I have answered your questions to the best if my ability and understanding of them. I dont care if DJT Is found guilty of a crime. His conduct after losing is unAmerican and deplorable, I want his private written communications unedited to be made public since he was supposed to be working for me but he worked so hard against me and against the Constitutional process of elections.
so there. what about that one.
No.,
No.
To investigate the political effort to overturn the election and the riot we all saw that happened because of it,
No. The work of the committee is necessary and appropriate so it can never be considered wrong by a fair minded unbiased democracy loving American.
That is not a fact, period.
The committee members have not done anything wrong in being on the committee so they will never have to admit they are wrong for being on the committee.
They are not required to do so.
Yes.
Yes.
Until you can cite the use of irrelevant and made up "facts" presented in the finding I will withhold judgment on such a scenario.
Yes, sufficiently capable.
No akready explained why.
Yes and No in that order. I believe they are honorable people specifically Kinzinger.
I Don’t agree with your predisposed conclusion before the Committee is barely getting started . Your judgment is already shown to be flawed when you question the subpoena to Bannon because you said he was no longer involved with the President. He was in the Willard Hotel on riot eve. You have discredited yourself on this subject
ThisIsMe. .
I’m certain they can because much of the case will undoubtedly be based on documented evidence and video recordings And because Cheney have put their careers and lives on the line to get to the truth for the country they love.
answered and I’m not interested in them finding Trump guilty.
No. I have answered your questions to the best if my ability and understanding of them. I dont care if DJT Is found guilty of a crime. His conduct after losing is unAmerican and deplorable, I want his private written communications unedited to be made public since he was supposed to be working for me but he worked so hard against me and against the Constitutional process of elections.
so there. what about that one.
No.,
No.
To investigate the political effort to overturn the election and the riot we all saw that happened because of it,
No. The work of the committee is necessary and appropriate so it can never be considered wrong by a fair minded unbiased democracy loving American.
Changing the premise of the question to avoid answering. My question wasn't whether or not having the investigation was right or wrong, but if they couldn't find the evidence to prove Trump was guilty of planning and ordering the attack on the capitol, would they be able to admit it, and admit they were wrong about their accusations of trump.
That is not a fact, period
You believe the committee to be open minded, and capable of complete objectivity when it comes to this investigation? Is that your belief? They have no bias, no pressure conceived notions? They don't believe Trump is guilty and are all just waiting to see where the evidence takes them? I'm pretty sure most of them have already stated they think he is guilty, so, that the are predisposed to his guilt is fact.
The committee members have not done anything wrong in being on the committee so they will never have to admit they are wrong for being on the committee.
Again, changing the premise of the question. No offense, but I'm beginning to think you are a bot that hasn't been programmed to understand context. There have been many times you have answered a question that was based on a different premise than the question asked.
They are not required to do so
If the investigation leads to a place that they can't prove Trump guilty, yeah, i think they are required to tell the public of that.
I may have to use a computer to do some searching for when Hillary was on trial for Benghazi, I'm betting, if you commented on those threads, I could find posts of your condemning the republican committee for being biased and unfair. Will have to see what happens in the future when/if Biden is ever the subject of a committee investigation.
Obviously you havent been paying attention to the news if you think the dems can be fair. Nearly every one of them has already said he was guilty. Most of them have already said he should never be allowed to run for office again, many of them said he should be in jail. How can you expect they will be capable of being fair and objective?
Until you can cite the use of irrelevant and made up "facts" presented in the finding I will withhold judgment on such a scenario.
We will have to wait until the committee concludes and the report is released.
Yes and No in that order. I believe they are honorable people specifically Kinzinger.
You find kinzinger to be fair, though he already voted to impeach Trump? I don't share your optimism.
I Don’t agree with your predisposed conclusion before the Committee is barely getting started . Your judgment is already shown to be flawed when you question the subpoena to Bannon because you said he was no longer involved with the President. He was in the Willard Hotel on riot eve. You have discredited yourself on this subject
Bannons involvement has nothing to do with any of the questions I've asked you, which have l been about the committees fairness and objectivity.
I’m certain they can because much of the case will undoubtedly be based on documented evidence and video recordings And because Cheney have put their careers and lives on the line to get to the truth for the country they love.
I will await the results to see if they have video evidence. So far, however, we have seen no video evidence that Trump and company were involved with the planning and execution of the riot that attacked the capitol.
answered and I’m not interested in them finding Trump guilty.
Really? What are you looking for then? Are you suggesting that you dont already have your mind made up?
To investigate the political effort to overturn the election and the riot we all saw that happened because of it,
People didn't riot because of an effort to overturn the election, the rooted because they believed the election had been stolen. ..and before you say it, no, just because Trump told people the election had been stolen that he is guilty of planning and directing the attack.
Let's think about this for a moment. For Trump to actually plan and intend for there to be an attack.on the capitol, he would have had to have organized groups all planned out, otherwise, it would have boiled down to him hoping that enough people were angry enough to react, and not have just a few in on it, but the rest not up to it. He would have had to have know that there was a potential for people to be killed. He would have to had known that the entire world was watching, and staging a coup live on TV would never have worked, not in the US. He would have had to have know that there was no way that a rag tag group of people only armed with what...2 flag poles, could not possibly lay siege on the capitol, take control, and hold it, and continue to secure it for any period of time. He would have to have know that the majority of the US and the rest of the world would have never recognized him as the legitimate president.
There are a lot of flaws in any plan to try and lay siege to the congress. The FBI said there was no planning and no coordination. It was random people, many of whom were probably enticed by agitators in the days leading up to the riot.
