NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 26,298
- 5,542
- 245
struth wrote: what’s the bad faith in the memo? 21OCT26-POST#371
NFBW wrote: Congress is bound by federal law to accept the safe harbor slate of electors from the December 14 deadline? 21OCT26-POST#381
Oldestyle wrote: This whole mess goes to the Supreme Court... 21OCT26-POST#377
NFBW wrote: Do you Oldestyle and struth understand what it means if Congress is bound by federal law to accept the safe harbor slate of electors that met the December 14 Constitutional deadline? 21OCT26-POST#381
NFBW wrote: There is no mess to go to the Supreme Court Oldstyle. All the states reached the Safe Harbor DATE stipulated in the Constitution - - - The election was decided on December 14 when all fifty states submitted their certified election results. 21OCT26-POST#381
Key Election Dates
Dec. 8: States finish vote certification
Dec. 14: Electors vote
Jan. 6: Congress formalizes the outcome
Jan. 20: Inauguration Day
»Read a full timeline from Election Day to Inauguration Day.
"If a state can conclude its process of appointing electors by that [safe harbor deadline] then Congress is bound by federal law to accept the slate of electors that is arrived upon by that date," said Rebecca Green, the co-director of the Election Law program at William and Mary
NFBW wrote: The bad faith in the EASTMAN memo struth was to unconstitutionally ignore the safe harbor date results and advise the President that Pence could reject seven states that Biden won just for believing as Correll suggests that those safe harbor electors were tainted by fraud. 21OCT26-POST#381
Correll wrote: 1. Is it not Pence's job to make that call himself? - - - 2. IF Pence believed that the ballots were fraudulent, is that not what SHOULD have happened? 21OCT16-POST#887
NFBW wrote: Congress is bound by federal law to accept the safe harbor slate of electors from the December 14 deadline? 21OCT26-POST#381
Oldestyle wrote: This whole mess goes to the Supreme Court... 21OCT26-POST#377
NFBW wrote: Do you Oldestyle and struth understand what it means if Congress is bound by federal law to accept the safe harbor slate of electors that met the December 14 Constitutional deadline? 21OCT26-POST#381
NFBW wrote: There is no mess to go to the Supreme Court Oldstyle. All the states reached the Safe Harbor DATE stipulated in the Constitution - - - The election was decided on December 14 when all fifty states submitted their certified election results. 21OCT26-POST#381
Key Election Dates
Dec. 8: States finish vote certification
Dec. 14: Electors vote
Jan. 6: Congress formalizes the outcome
Jan. 20: Inauguration Day
»Read a full timeline from Election Day to Inauguration Day.
"If a state can conclude its process of appointing electors by that [safe harbor deadline] then Congress is bound by federal law to accept the slate of electors that is arrived upon by that date," said Rebecca Green, the co-director of the Election Law program at William and Mary
NFBW wrote: The bad faith in the EASTMAN memo struth was to unconstitutionally ignore the safe harbor date results and advise the President that Pence could reject seven states that Biden won just for believing as Correll suggests that those safe harbor electors were tainted by fraud. 21OCT26-POST#381
Correll wrote: 1. Is it not Pence's job to make that call himself? - - - 2. IF Pence believed that the ballots were fraudulent, is that not what SHOULD have happened? 21OCT16-POST#887
Last edited: