Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[Rigby5]

Cheney is being investigated.

 

[Rigby5]

{...
New texts have emerged of alleged secret communication between Liz Cheney, former January 6 committee vice chair, and a key witness.

Former White House official Cassidy Hutchinson was due to testify that she saw then-President Donald Trump agreeing with January 6 rioters who were chanting "Hang Mike Pence," the then-vice president.

Republican National Committee member, Harmeet Dhillon, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday: "This is a very serious ethical violation and lawyers can be disciplined by the bar for contacting a represented party concerning the subject matter of the representation, without the permission and knowledge of that party's lawyer."

The Congressional Committee on House Administration has issued a statement in which it says that Cheney, then a Republican congresswoman who was strongly opposed to Trump, had used third-party communications to arrange a meeting with Hutchinson before her 2022 testimony.

Cheney, who lost her seat later in 2022, has been a frequent target of pro-Trump Republicans. She announced this year that she will vote for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

In a statement, the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight said that its Republican chairman, Barry Loudermilk, "obtained never-before-seen correspondence between January 6 Select Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson and in 2022, while Hutchinson was still a subject of the Select Committee's investigation."

The statement added: "In the months prior to Hutchinson's explosive private and public testimony, Cheney communicated with Hutchinson, both directly and through an intermediary—Alyssa Farah Griffin—while Hutchinson was represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino."

Newsweek sought email comment from Cheney and Griffin on Wednesday.

It is clear from the communication that Griffin told Hutchinson that Cheney wanted "a follow up with you, with your lawyer that she and [January 6 committee lawyer] Dan George can lead." This suggests that both Cheney and Griffin wanted to ensure that Hutchinson had legal representation at the meetings. The January 6 committee conducted six interviews of Hutchinson in total.

"Farah Griffin and Hutchinson knew each other from their time working together in the White House. Farah Griffin was one of the first former Trump administration officials to publicly criticize Trump in January 2021, and was publicly working with the Select Committee on its investigation," the oversight committee's statement reads.
...}

Liz Cheney accused of committing "ethical violation" over Jan. 6 witness

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
It can never be illegal in a democratic republic for the public to occupy its own property, like the capital building.
When the public is ignored by Congress, then the public has the right to occupy their own structures, so ensure their voice is heard and their will recognize.

The only "violence" was by the police who illegally murdered several unarmed people.

I am not wrong YOU ARE

It can be and IS illegal in any form of government

Your claims are outright lies

 

[otto105]

Invading the capital is perfectly legal in a democratic republic.
It is clearly an expression of political speech, and therefore protected.
It would only have been illegal if it lasted 2 weeks and had interfered with the inauguration.

Whether or not Cheney was legally elected and placed on the committee, the actions of the committee were illegal since the occupation of the capital for a few hours cannot be claimed to be an insurrection as Cheney claimed.
That was a misuse of power.

Hilarious stuuuupid fuckup

 

[otto105]

{...
New texts have emerged of alleged secret communication between Liz Cheney, former January 6 committee vice chair, and a key witness.

Former White House official Cassidy Hutchinson was due to testify that she saw then-President Donald Trump agreeing with January 6 rioters who were chanting "Hang Mike Pence," the then-vice president.

Republican National Committee member, Harmeet Dhillon, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday: "This is a very serious ethical violation and lawyers can be disciplined by the bar for contacting a represented party concerning the subject matter of the representation, without the permission and knowledge of that party's lawyer."

The Congressional Committee on House Administration has issued a statement in which it says that Cheney, then a Republican congresswoman who was strongly opposed to Trump, had used third-party communications to arrange a meeting with Hutchinson before her 2022 testimony.

Cheney, who lost her seat later in 2022, has been a frequent target of pro-Trump Republicans. She announced this year that she will vote for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

In a statement, the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight said that its Republican chairman, Barry Loudermilk, "obtained never-before-seen correspondence between January 6 Select Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson and in 2022, while Hutchinson was still a subject of the Select Committee's investigation."

The statement added: "In the months prior to Hutchinson's explosive private and public testimony, Cheney communicated with Hutchinson, both directly and through an intermediary—Alyssa Farah Griffin—while Hutchinson was represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino."

Newsweek sought email comment from Cheney and Griffin on Wednesday.

It is clear from the communication that Griffin told Hutchinson that Cheney wanted "a follow up with you, with your lawyer that she and [January 6 committee lawyer] Dan George can lead." This suggests that both Cheney and Griffin wanted to ensure that Hutchinson had legal representation at the meetings. The January 6 committee conducted six interviews of Hutchinson in total.

"Farah Griffin and Hutchinson knew each other from their time working together in the White House. Farah Griffin was one of the first former Trump administration officials to publicly criticize Trump in January 2021, and was publicly working with the Select Committee on its investigation," the oversight committee's statement reads.
...}

Liz Cheney accused of committing "ethical violation" over Jan. 6 witness

Lardermilk is just a piece of crap sycophant.

Remember Heil Shitler! only hires the best people.

 

[Rigby5]

I am not wrong YOU ARE

It can be and IS illegal in any form of government

Your claims are outright lies

Wrong.
When you have a democratic republic, then it is the public who owns all government property, NOT Congress or any hired employee.
The government is subordinate to the people, not the other way around.

 

[progressive hunter]

Wrong.
It can never be illegal in a democratic republic for the public to occupy its own property, like the capital building.
When the public is ignored by Congress, then the public has the right to occupy their own structures, so ensure their voice is heard and their will recognize.

The only "violence" was by the police who illegally murdered several unarmed people.

try to occupy a military base or the whitehouse and let us know how it turns out,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Wrong.
When you have a democratic republic, then it is the public who owns all government property, NOT Congress or any hired employee.
The government is subordinate to the people, not the other way around.

constitutional republic,,

 

[scruffy]

No it is not perfectly legal. In any nation. It is not a form of experssion it is an act of initiating violence

Sure, right. Violence with no firearms. Go figure.

 

[scruffy]

try to occupy a military base or the whitehouse and let us know how it turns out,,

Try occupying the city of Seattle and let us know how it turns out.

 

[progressive hunter]

Try occupying the city of Seattle and let us know how it turns out.

people occupy Seattle as we speak,,

 

[scruffy]

I am not wrong YOU ARE

It can be and IS illegal in any form of government

Except for Seattle's form, apparently.

Your claims are outright lies

What about 5/20? How come those people aren't rotting in jail?

 

[progressive hunter]

Except for Seattle's form, apparently.



What about 5/20? How come those people aren't rotting in jail?

5/29

 

[Soupnazi630]

Sure, right. Violence with no firearms. Go figure.

Yes your sarcasm is massively stupid.

Violence is not limited to firearms MORON

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
When you have a democratic republic, then it is the public who owns all government property, NOT Congress or any hired employee.
The government is subordinate to the people, not the other way around.

That is irrelevant

 

[Jroc]

No it is not perfectly legal. In any nation. It is not a form of experssion it is an act of initiating violence

The capital police and the FBI assets in the crowd initiated the violence

 

[scruffy]

Yes your sarcasm is massively stupid.

Violence is not limited to firearms MORON

It is if you're trying to overthrow the government.

Duh.

 

[progressive hunter]

It is if you're trying to overthrow the government.

Duh.

our CIA has overthrown many governments without guns,,

 

[scruffy]

our CIA has overthrown many governments without guns,,

600 voters isn't the CIA, doofus.

 

[progressive hunter]

600 voters isn't the CIA, doofus.

never said it was so not sure why youre bringing it up,,

what I am doing is showing how you are being controlled by the left,,

the only thing that need be said about j6 is a few hundred unarmed hotheads decided to break some shit and force their way into the capital and a few hundred more followed them in and then they went home a few hours later,,

that in no way is an insurrection,,

playing word games with the left is like wrestling a pig,, you both get muddy and the pig likes it,,