Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[otto105]

never said it was so not sure why youre bringing it up,,

what I am doing is showing how you are being controlled by the left,,

the only thing that need be said about j6 is a few hundred unarmed hotheads decided to break some shit and force their way into the capital and a few hundred more followed them in and then they went home a few hours later,,

that in no way is an insurrection,,

playing word games with the left is like wrestling a pig,, you both get muddy and the pig likes it,,

So, why did those fuckup hotheads force their way into the Capitol?

What was going on there?

 

[struth]

Who led the republic committee that you cite as evidence of something.

The Republic Committee? It was lead by a bipartisan committee in the US Congress. The Committee isn’t evidence. The committee conducted oversight, the information they uncovered on behalf of the Republic is evidence

Again, it’s sad you are just learning about basic civics here

 

[San Souci]

Look, imo the prosecutions of Trump were absurd, UNLESS there was evidence he was connected to the mob's decision to invade the capital. (Although lobbying for GA's election folks to "find" more votes could be a crime as well .... if the dems could spin "finding" as "creating" votes. But imo that's a stretch)

But like it or not, Cheney was legally elected and legally placed on the committee.

Democrats always "Create" votes. Look how long it took to "Count" a few seats in Commifornia.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is if you're trying to overthrow the government.

Duh.

I never said they were trying to overthhrow the government

I said they were violent and they WERE.

Your stupid ass thinks violence began with the inventon of firearms

 

[otto105]

The Republic Committee? It was lead by a bipartisan committee in the US Congress. The Committee isn’t evidence. The committee conducted oversight, the information they uncovered on behalf of the Republic is evidence

Again, it’s sad you are just learning about basic civics here

So, who led the committee which released the dissent report?

Again

 

[struth]

So, who led the committee which released the dissent report?

Again

Not sure, what dissent report?

 

[otto105]

Not sure, what dissent report?

Were the findings that you posted from the official committee or a dissent gop house member?

 

[struth]

Were the findings that you posted from the official committee or a dissent gop house member?

From the official bipartisan committee

You should really educate yourself

You are really clueless and look really stupid

 

[hadit]

Sure they would. These Republicans are unethical liars.

There is no reason to believe that. Let the investigation commence.

 

[hadit]

Hell, Trump repeats lies all the time and he just brushes it off saying that "it's what I was told" and it's okay with you.

She was a witness who testified to what she saw and heard. She has no responsibility beyond that.

But there still isn't any proof she lied, after we correctly characterized what her testimony actually was rather than your false description.

That doesn't excuse the House democrats from using uncorroborated, unsubstantiated third-party testimony in a feeble attempt to smear a president.

 

[hadit]

NONE of the witnesses called Hutchison a liar or said it didn’t happen when giving sworn testimony. One SS guy in the car said “he didn’t see it happen” what he didn’t say was “it never happened”. He could have been looking outside the car and missed it, but saying he didn’t “see it happen” as opposed to “it never happened” is proof positive that he knew it happened, he just didn’t see it.

We're all well aware of TRUMP!'s superhuman ninja abilities that he used to disable the SS agents around him, burst through the divider and, from the back seat, grab the wheel. The guy is superhuman, I tells ya!

 

[hadit]

She told her story as she was told.

Good luck with trying to make her a sycophant again.

The fault lies with the House democrats who used such weak testimony to smear a president.

 

[struth]

That doesn't excuse the House democrats from using uncorroborated, unsubstantiated third-party testimony in a feeble attempt to smear a president.

Not to mention tampering with witnesses to change their testimony

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Were the findings that you posted from the official committee or a dissent gop house member?

from the committee

 

[skye]

how is that! huh?

 

[otto105]

from the committee

What committee?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

What committee?

Keep playing dumb retard

 

[otto105]

Keep playing dumb retard

Again, what committee.

 

[struth]

Again, what committee.

Geez man, didn’t I tell you already? It’s the US House Oversight Committee

 

[otto105]

Geez man, didn’t I tell you already? It’s the US House Oversight Committee

Is that what landermilk put out? The committees findings or his personal dissent from the official committee findings.