Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

Why do yoj dembots deny what the bipartisan house oversight subcommittee reported?

Your denial won’t change the criminal referral and your entire Jan 6 committee witness tampering scandal
Because they provided no evidence. Accusations aren’t evidence
 
Best to let a GJ get all the parties under oath to see what happened. GJs have a way of getting to the truth because people don't want to go to prison for lying to a GJ.
It’s just a he said she said. There’s not going to be evidence beyond a reasonable doubt either way.
 
Because they provided no evidence. Accusations aren’t evidence
No the bipartisan subcommittee provided the evidence that outlined it in their report and handed it over to the DOJ.

Why would I provide the evidence
? I didn’t conduct the investigation
 
1734570593069.webp
 
Good thing for Cassidy's sake she realized the attorney trumpworld provided for her was working for Dear Leader, not her.

Hutchinson, former Meadows aide, replaces lawyer on cusp of Jan. 6 hearings


Cassidy Hutchinson — a top aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows during the Trump era — has parted ways with her lawyer and brought on new representation. Her new lawyer, Jody Hunt of Alston Bird, confirmed the move to POLITICO.

The change in counsel signals an increased willingness from Hutchinson to cooperate fully with the Jan. 6 select committee’s probe, according to a person familiar with her thinking. The panel has signaled that it views her as a key witness.

Passantino, Hutchinson’s former attorney, was the Trump White House’s chief ethics lawyer. And Passantino’s firm, Michael Best, has Trump World connections; its president is former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, and Justin Clark — also a top Trump World lawyer — is currently on leave from the firm, according to its website.

“Ms. Hutchinson made the independent decision to part ways with her Trump-funded lawyer, freeing her to provide candid, truthful, and honorable testimony to the January 6th Committee about the attack on the Capitol, alongside dozens of Republican witnesses and law enforcement officers,” he said. “Despite baseless attacks by men with their own agendas to discredit her, Ms. Hutchinson stands by her testimony and remains committed to the truth and accountability.”

The baseless accusation from trump lackey Rep. Loudermilk gives Dem senators an opening to grill Bondi and Patel during their confirmation hearings (ones trump wanted to avoid) over whether they plan on doing Baby Donald's bidding. Namely, to re-write the history revealed by the 1/6 committee and intimidate those would may participate in future investigations of trump's criminal acts. Personally, I will be disappointed if senators like Chris Murphy don't rip Patel's head off and expose him as an enemy of the state.
 
That talks about communications only. Nothing about coaching or tampering with testimony

Communication with witnesses can be illegal. The GJ will get to the bottom of it.
 
We'll see.
I wouldn't be surprised. Trump is hoping to fill the DoJ with people who would pursue this matter to punish Cheney instead of following long establish DoJ protocols.
 
Not without a reasonable suspicion as to whether she broke the law.

The referral is just that. The GJ will see if it can develop probable cause that a crime was committed.
 
Passantino, Hutchinson’s former attorney, was the Trump White House’s chief ethics lawyer. And Passantino’s firm, Michael Best, has Trump World connections; its president is former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, and Justin Clark — also a top Trump World lawyer — is currently on leave from the firm, according to its website.

“Ms. Hutchinson made the independent decision to part ways with her Trump-funded lawyer, freeing her to provide candid, truthful, and honorable testimony to the January 6th Committee about the attack on the Capitol, alongside dozens of Republican witnesses and law enforcement officers,” he said. “Despite baseless attacks by men with their own agendas to discredit her, Ms. Hutchinson stands by her testimony and remains committed to the truth and accountability.”

The baseless accusation from trump lackey Rep. Loudermilk gives Dem senators an opening to grill Bondi and Patel during their confirmation hearings (ones trump wanted to avoid) over whether they plan on doing Baby Donald's bidding. Namely, to re-write the history revealed by the 1/6 committee and intimidate those would may participate in future investigations of trump's criminal acts. Personally, I will be disappointed if senators like Chris Murphy don't rip Patel's head off and expose him as an enemy of the state.
Well we know this is all lies now. We know that Liz used backdoor channels to communicate with Cassidy, then directly spoke to her when getting her a lawyer that she picked up.

Geez trumps not even sworn in yet and the walls are falling off the demafasict corrupt regime
Liz is going to prison
 
I wouldn't be surprised. Trump is hoping to fill the DoJ with people who would pursue this matter to punish Cheney instead of following long establish DoJ protocols.

Let a GJ decide.
 
I wouldn't be surprised. Trump is hoping to fill the DoJ with people who would pursue this matter to punish Cheney instead of following long establish DoJ protocols.
Doubt he’ll illegally appoint a special prosecutor like xiden did.
 
No he didn’t say he didn’t remembert telling her. He said it didn’t happen, which is what everyone else there said. Everyone contridicted her testimony

Why do yoj lie?
Ornato wasn't in the vehicle with Trump and testified that he doesn't remember anyone telling him anything about anything that happened in the vehicle.

Ornato couldn't seem to recall a lot of things that happened that day in his testimony.
 
Ornato wasn't in the vehicle with Trump and testified that he doesn't remember anyone telling him anything about anything that happened in the vehicle.

Ornato couldn't seem to recall a lot of things that happened that day in his testimony.
Nah his testimony was clear and suooorted by others that where there.

Cassidy is the only that had these crazy stories and they only came up after the corrupt communicates with Liz
 
No the bipartisan subcommittee provided the evidence that outlined it in their report and handed it over to the DOJ.

Why would I provide the evidence
? I didn’t conduct the investigation
They provided evidence of communication. That’s it
 
Nah his testimony was clear and suooorted by others that where there.

Cassidy is the only that had these crazy stories and they only came up after the corrupt communicates with Liz
Those stories were related to her by Ornato. Her Trump provided lawyer didn’t want her to say anything
 
Last edited:
Nah his testimony was clear and suooorted by others that where there.

Cassidy is the only that had these crazy stories and they only came up after the corrupt communicates with Liz
I just read it now and it's clear that he doesn't remember much. His testimony is directly contradicted by others who were in the White House that afternoon.

Ornato does not seem to be a reliable witness. Engel testified that he came to his office and talked about a subsequent move to the Capitol. Ornato just couldn't remember having any such conversation.
 
Communication with witnesses can be illegal. The GJ will get to the bottom of it.
You don't get it. The point of the accusation is the smear. To animate nitwits like you (and intimidate future investigators), not to prove anything. Look at how many people still believe the lies about Joe Biden taking bribes, or trump winning the election. Zero evidence of either..........just as there is zero evidence Cheney broke the law. It's a circus for the rubes.
 
Back
Top Bottom