Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[RetiredGySgt]

No she didn't.

Goddamn, do any of you people know anything about any of this?

she said she was told it happened.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

she said she was told it happened.

Better.

 

[struth]

You have zero evidence to support that.

Why do yoj dembots deny what the bipartisan house oversight subcommittee reported?

Your denial won’t change the criminal referral and your entire Jan 6 committee witness tampering scandal

 

[DonGlock26]

Better save your tantrums.

I don't do tantrums, but I've see a lot of TDS tantrums lately.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Better.

not better every single member of that detail said it never happened and that they did not tell her it did.

 

[Marener]

Like this?

That’s the law. Yes

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

not better every single member of that detail said it never happened and that they did not tell her it did.

Not under oath, they didn't.

The person who told her that explicitly refused to testify under oath.

He denied it publicly because there are no consequences for lying in public about it.

Let's not play stupid.

 

[Marener]

not better every single member of that detail said it never happened and that they did not tell her it did.

Hutchinson said that it was Ornato who told her. Ornato said he doesn’t remember, but there’s plenty of reason to doubt his testimony since it was inconsistent with numerous other people.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[DonGlock26]

That’s the law. Yes

I think a GJ is needed to determine if Liz broke that law.

 

[struth]

Of course that will never happen, because no court is going to summon a grand jury over the vapid garbage in the GOP report.

You seem to have a hard time understanding the posture of Liz’s case

The bipartisan house subcommittee referred the case to the DOJ. The DOJ will conduct a criminal probe and impanel a grand jury at their request

 

[DonGlock26]

Hutchinson said that it was Ornato who told her. Ornato said he doesn’t remember, but there’s plenty of reason to doubt his testimony since it was inconsistent with numerous other people.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

Best to let a GJ get all the parties under oath to see what happened. GJs have a way of getting to the truth because people don't want to go to prison for lying to a GJ.

 

[DonGlock26]

You seem to have a hard time understanding the posture of Liz’s case

The bipartisan house subcommittee referred the case to the DOJ. The DOJ will conduct a criminal probe and impanel a grand jury at their reject.

This really seems to bother them.

 

[struth]

Hutchinson said that it was Ornato who told her. Ornato said he doesn’t remember, but there’s plenty of reason to doubt his testimony since it was inconsistent with numerous other people.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

No he didn’t say he didn’t remembert telling her. He said it didn’t happen, which is what everyone else there said. Everyone contridicted her testimony

Why do yoj lie?

 

[DonGlock26]

No he didn’t say he didn’t remembert telling her. He said it didn’t happen, which is what everyone else there said. Everyone contridicted her testimony

Why do yoj lie?

I wonder where her crazy story came from?

 

[0311]

I just want to see her testimony under oath.

No, you want to twist her testimony. You have no proof, and you know you have no proof, just and empty and meaningless accusation based on lies and half truths. If you proof, post it. That's the all you MAGA MAGGOTS have, you never have any proof.

 

[struth]

I wonder where her crazy story came from?

Well, it started after Lizzy corrupt back channel communications

Seems pretty clear

 

[0311]

This really seems to bother them.

Only the lies of MAGA bothers us.

 

[struth]

No, you want to twist her testimony. You have no proof, and you know you have no proof, just and empty and meaningless accusation based on lies and half truths. If you proof, post it. That's the all you MAGA MAGGOTS have, you never have any proof.

It’s posted in the OP, there is a link

 

[Marener]

I think a GJ is needed to determine if Liz broke that law.

Not without a reasonable suspicion as to whether she broke the law.

 

[Lesh]

You can start with this. The report, which you claim to have read, has hyperlinks.

That talks about communications only. Nothing about coaching or tampering with testimony