Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

If there is no proof,

Then YOU admit to having nothing. YOU admit you have no proof. All you have conjecture, contention, supposition, hearsay and unfound and unsupported and unsubstantiated lies based on nothing. You need proof and you have no proof.
 
Irrational conversations is all you got J rock

Republicans are the ones who should be jailed. Cheney is a patriot who is standing up to NAZI REPUBLICANS.
You gotta love the way you crazy libs throw out the word Nazi.....I'm pretty sure it's you nutjobs who attacking and tormenting Jews students on college campuses.....get some help for your TDS.
 
Then post your proof. Provide a link supporting this heretofore unfound and unsubstantiated rumor Because that is all you have, a rumor. Post your fucking proof!

There are links in this thread for you to follow.
 
You don't get it. The point of the accusation is the smear. To animate nitwits like you (and intimidate future investigators), not to prove anything. Look at how many people still believe the lies about Joe Biden taking bribes, or trump winning the election. Zero evidence of either..........just as there is zero evidence Cheney broke the law. It's a circus for the rubes.

Hey, it's just a grand jury. Relax, it's not like Biden is on trial yet.
 
Why do you fools keep saying that nonsense? If she has to lawyer up at considerable personal expense that alone is reason enough for some people to ask themselves if getting involved in an investigation is worth being the target of a baseless attack.
It's about an attempt to silence critics, to cow them in to submission. Open your freakin' eyes.

Welcome to lawfare. The Democrats invented it.
 
He never happened? Interesting take on this lol.

He said he didn’t remember
Yes he said he didn’t recall anything like Cassidy stated

How in the world could he recall something that didn’t happen? All the other witnessed supported his testimony

Only Liz’s tampered with witness stated it happened
 
You can start with this. The report, which you claim to have read, has hyperlinks.
I should hope Cassidy's attorney was not there since HE is who Cassidy felt was not protecting her best interests, but Donald Trump's interest, who was paying her attorney!

OF COURSE HE WAS NOT THERE, silly one! ;). She was advised to seek another Attorney's advice and defense after she told what her attorney told her to do...!
 
Have you read the federal witness tampering laws?
Has there ever been a witness that testified that a prosecutor called to the stand, that was not spoken to first? Or a defense witness called to the stand, without the defense attorney knowing what they were going to say....without talking to them first?

Has there ever been a public congressional hearing, where a congressman called a witness, and the congressman did not already know what his witness would testify to, because he or staff interviewed him first?

This is NORMAL every day practice...not criminal!
 
Witness tampering...

Days after Cheney began communicating directly with Hutchinson, Hutchinson fired Passantino and hired Cheney’s recommended attorneys, who agreed to represent Hutchinson pro bono. Within a few weeks, Cheney brought Hutchinson in for a secretive fourth transcribed interview. During this fourth transcribed interview, only Cheney and one other Committee counsel were present, in addition to Hutchinson’s new counsel. During this fourth transcribed interview Hutchinson testified to some of her most outlandish new claims.

The Subcommittee was only able to obtain a limited number of text messages from Hutchinson and Farah Griffin, but Cheney’s influence on Hutchinson is apparent from that point forward by her dramatic change in testimony and eventual claims against President Trump using second- and third-hand accounts. Specifically, Hutchinson claimed that Anthony Ornato told Hutchinson that Trump lunged toward the driver of his car after he was denied his request to go to the Capitol. This story has never been corroborated and was directly refuted by both USSS agents in the vehicle with Trump that day.

 
Yes he said he didn’t recall anything like Cassidy stated

How in the world could he recall something that didn’t happen? All the other witnessed supported his testimony

Only Liz’s tampered with witness stated it happened
If it didn’t happen he would have said it didn’t happen.

He took the safe weasel way to lie and claimed he couldn’t remember
 
Witness tampering...

Days after Cheney began communicating directly with Hutchinson, Hutchinson fired Passantino and hired Cheney’s recommended attorneys, who agreed to represent Hutchinson pro bono. Within a few weeks, Cheney brought Hutchinson in for a secretive fourth transcribed interview. During this fourth transcribed interview, only Cheney and one other Committee counsel were present, in addition to Hutchinson’s new counsel. During this fourth transcribed interview Hutchinson testified to some of her most outlandish new claims.

The Subcommittee was only able to obtain a limited number of text messages from Hutchinson and Farah Griffin, but Cheney’s influence on Hutchinson is apparent from that point forward by her dramatic change in testimony and eventual claims against President Trump using second- and third-hand accounts. Specifically, Hutchinson claimed that Anthony Ornato told Hutchinson that Trump lunged toward the driver of his car after he was denied his request to go to the Capitol. This story has never been corroborated and was directly refuted by both USSS agents in the vehicle with Trump that day.

So no actual evidence of tampering with her testimony
 
If it didn’t happen he would have said it didn’t happen.

He took the safe weasel way to lie and claimed he couldn’t remember
He did. What do you think he meant when he said he didn’t recall any conversation like she described? Cause it didn’t happen

Just like all the other witnesses said
 
He did. What do you think he meant when he said he didn’t recall any conversation like she described? Cause it didn’t happen

Just like all the other witnesses said
If it didn’t happen he would have said so in his testimony. He didn’t

He said he didn’t remember. Why? Because someone may have heard and that would subject him to perjury charges
 
Back
Top Bottom