DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 8,418
- 13,258
- 2,268
Post the language from the report that shows Cheney told her what to say.
Do you want a transcript?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Post the language from the report that shows Cheney told her what to say.
He will just deny it even exist after you post itDo you want a transcript?
That’s simply untrue.I have repeatedly dembot
No I have.That’s simply untrue.
But if you wish to prove me wrong, here’s your chance. Post the language from the report showing evidence that Cheney told her what to say.
Not sure what you mean by transcript. People keep claiming there’s evidence in the report but consistently fail to produce any part of the report that would constitute evidence.Do you want a transcript?
Yet again you fail to prove me wrong.No I have.
No you’ve repeatedly proven yourself to be wrongYet again you fail to prove me wrong.
But you still can! Just post the language from the report that shows this. All you ever do is link the report and quote from the conclusion. You never quote any evidence supporting your accusations.
But if she actually booted the lawyer and rewrote the witness testimony to be better suited for prosecuting the Target she sure as hell did something wrong..... Witness tampering on a federal level carries much larger penalties than on a state level.Look, imo the prosecutions of Trump were absurd, UNLESS there was evidence he was connected to the mob's decision to invade the capital. (Although lobbying for GA's election folks to "find" more votes could be a crime as well .... if the dems could spin "finding" as "creating" votes. But imo that's a stretch)
But like it or not, Cheney was legally elected and legally placed on the committee.
Yep liz is looking at 20 yearsBut if she actually booted the lawyer and rewrote the witness testimony to be better suited for prosecuting the Target she sure as hell did something wrong..... Witness tampering on a federal level carries much larger penalties than on a state level.
All you’re doing is proving me right. You haven’t posted the evidence and won’t.No you’ve repeatedly proven yourself to be wrong
Ooook silly dembot…that doesn’t even think the report exist! HahaAll you’re doing is proving me right. You haven’t posted the evidence and won’t.
It would be easy to prove me wrong but you never do.
No, she related what someone else said.She presented the steering wheel as occurrent fact.
Then Trump's lapdog shouldn't have lied.No deviation from they all said no to the steering wheel grabbing
Yet again, given the opportunity to prove me wrong, you don’t.Ooook silly dembot…that doesn’t even think the report exist! Haha
Not sure what you mean by transcript. People keep claiming there’s evidence in the report but consistently fail to produce any part of the report that would constitute evidence.
It’s like they’re making it up.
I'm sure you people will do the usual lying out your ass about her as well.
I have dembot see all my post on this thread in response to youYet again, given the opportunity to prove me wrong, you don’t.
The longer you fail to do so, the clearer it is that you can’t.
Go ahead, prove me wrong.
I’d be happy for any of you to post the relevant text and footnotes. If there’s something relevant, I’ll be happy to go and read it.The 128 page report that you claim to have read contains footnotes listing books, media articles, interviews, and text messages. Do you want to read them?
None of your posts have done anything of the sort. I’ve read them all.I have dembot see all my post on this thread in response to you