Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[struth]

Which is correct.

She was asked under oath what he said.

She answered truthfully and had to do so, by law.

Ornato was invited to testify. He pussied out.

No he didn’t. He and many others testified contradicting what she said

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump’s Obstruction of Justice, From Mueller to Now​

The new reporting from the Post and the Times, though, adds the additional element that Trump personally asked Cannon to tell the Archives all documents had been returned. The Post also reports that Trump did so after himself “pack[ing] the boxes that were returned in January.” From the government’s filings, the scope of the former president’s direct involvement with the documents held at Mar-a-Lago was unclear. But now it seems that Trump himself was personally responsible for at least some of the decision-making around the handling of the documents.

News of such conduct by a former president obviously would have been noteworthy under any circumstances. But this isn’t even the only recent incident of potential obstruction of justice by Trump and those in his orbit. During its summer 2022 hearings, the Jan. 6 committee announced that the former president and his advisers had reached out to witnesses providing information to Congress. One witness, later reported to be White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, received phone calls telling her that—in her words—“as long as I continue to be a team player … I’m protecting who I need to protect, you know, I’ll continue to stay in good graces in Trump World. And they have reminded me a couple of times that Trump does read transcripts” of interviews before the committee. In another instance, Hutchinson was told that an individual—unnamed by the committee, but identified by Politico as former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Hutchinson’s one-time boss—“knows you’re loyal, and you’re going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition.”

After a subsequent hearing, committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) announced, “President Trump tried to call a witness in our investigation. … That person declined to answer or respond to President Trump’s call and instead alerted their lawyer to the call.” The Post later reported that Trump had also called other witnesses “throughout the Jan. 6 investigation.”

Trump’s Obstruction of Justice, From Mueller to Now

Reports of Donald Trump’s recent efforts to stymy the Mar-a-Lago investigation and the Jan. 6 committee sound a great deal like his attempts to obstruct Special Counsel

www.lawfaremedia.org

And? What are you refuting in my post? You basically reinforced my post.

 

[Marener]

Redirect Notice

images.app.goo.gl

Have you seen the evidence of witness tampering?

 

[Marener]

No he didn’t. He and many others testified contradicting what she said

Ornato’s testimony deviated from the testimony of a number of other people too. He’s far from trustworthy.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[DonGlock26]

Agreed, better safe then sorry. If Liz’s backdoor dealings were lawful she has nothing to fear

Exactly. I'm sure she can explain everything to the GJ under oath.

 

[struth]

Ornato’s testimony deviated from the testimony of a number of other people too. He’s far from trustworthy.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

The only person it deviated from was the witness that Liz tampered with

Nobody else recalled it either likely because as the driver and agents testified to it didn’t happen

 

[Lesh]

Exactly. I'm sure she can explain everything to the GJ under oath.

You mean like why the lawyer Trump provided for her told her to lie and tried to bribe her to do so?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And? What are you refuting in my post? You basically reinforced my post.

So you're saying Trump obstructed justice.

 

[DonGlock26]

Well that won't happen. No court is going to summon a grand jury. This is theater for rubes.

Sure.

 

[DonGlock26]

You mean like why the lawyer Trump provided for her told her to lie and tried to bribe her to do so?

You think Trump grabbed the wheel?

 

[ThisIsMe]

So you're saying Trump obstructed justice.

No, I'm saying he hasn't refuted the post he responded to

 

[struth]

You mean like why the lawyer Trump provided for her told her to lie and tried to bribe her to do so?

Haha what was lie and bribe?

 

[SeaMajor7]

The "Big Lie" is that Trump grabbed the steering wheel and demanded to be taken to the Whitehouse.
It will be disclosed very SOON that in FACT: Trump demanded the SS to take him to McDonolds.

 

[busybee01]

Her severe TDS broke her , she cought go to prison.

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), released an interim report on Tuesday regarding the January 6 Capitol riot. The report concluded that the attack was preventable and also called for an investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney over allegations of criminal witness tampering during the Democrat-led congressional inquiry into the event.


Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report states.

FBI to Investigate Liz Cheney Over J6 Witness Tampering?

pjmedia.com

Republicans are the ones who should be jailed. Cheney is a patriot who is standing up to NAZI REPUBLICANS.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Republicans are the ones who should be jailed. Cheney is a patriot who is standing up to NAZI REPUBLICANS.

"Imagine, if you will..."
- Rod Serling

 

[WEATHER53]

Which is correct.

She was asked under oath what he said.

She answered truthfully and had to do so, by law.

Ornato was invited to testify. He pussied out.

She presented the steering wheel as occurrent fact. The fact that she was lied to first does not relieve her of the responsibility that she spread, perpetuated and reintroduced the lie at Cheneys behest

 

[WEATHER53]

No deviation from they all said no to the steering wheel grabbing
Now go grab at more straws

 

[WEATHER53]

Ornato’s testimony deviated from the testimony of a number of other people too. He’s far from trustworthy.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

No deviation from all other witnessing that Trump never grabbed at the wheel in mentally incompetent fury

 

[Marener]

Frantic lib loon efforts to contend that a lie is not a lie if someone else told it to you.
Therefore you are free to spread the lie .
Also trying to change the phrase “I don’t remember seeing that” into a lack of clarity.

No deviation from all other witnessing that Trump never grabbed at the wheel in mentally incompetent fury

That’s nice but not relevant to demonstrating if Hutchinson lied under oath.

If anything, it’s evidence Ornato lied.

 

[WEATHER53]

That’s nice but not relevant to demonstrating if Hutchinson lied under oath.

If anything, it’s evidence Ornato lied.

Whatever came out of her mouth that was wrong and she did not confirm as fact is on her
Responsibility is like sun on a vampire to you