Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[DonGlock26]

At this point, there doesn't seem to be any evidence to warrant any investigation into the matter.

The Republicans on the committee seems to claim that Cheney communicating with Hutchinson is illegal, but I find no law that would indicate any such thing.

Then, she should have no problem testifying under oath to clear this matter up.

 

[Marener]

Then, she should have no problem testifying under oath to clear this matter up.

The DoJ cannot compel testimony without having a basis for doing so. Their power is not unlimited.

 

[Rawley]

What the fuck are you talking about? Are you aware that often FBI investigators are lawyers? Are they prohibited from interviewing witnesses because they are lawyers?

If the witnesses are represented by an attorney? Absofuckinglutely. Please tell me you are not this ignorant.

Of course not.

Back in the since corner for you

Hilarious that you and Mare continue to defend Liz fucking Cheney.

 

[struth]

The DoJ cannot compel testimony without having a basis for doing so. Their power is not unlimited.

They don't need to compel testimony....what in the world are you talking about? They simply can intervew her, and they have a bases for doing so because the case was referred to them by the US Congress for a criminal probe.

 

[j-mac]

I'm having a great one at your expense.

At my expense? How so?

 

[Lesh]

If the witnesses are represented by an attorney? Absofuckinglutely. Please tell me you are not this ignorant.

Hilarious that you and Mare continue to defend Liz fucking Cheney.

It’s up to the witness whether or not they request an attorney being present dumbfuk

 

[Curried Goats]

At my expense? How so?

By your need to pretend I said something and then how quickly you want to run away when I ask for the quote. You're a funny little guy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL So you think its "common sense" that a lawyer conducting an investigation can secretly talk to a witness that she knows is represented? WHat law school did you go to where they taught you that was "common sense?"

Which courtroom do you imagine the hearings took place in?

 

[struth]

It’s up to the witness whether or not they request an attorney being present dumbfuk

she had a lawyer, you dembot

It is unusual—and potentially unethical—for a Member of Congress conducting an investigation to contact a witness if the Member knows that the individual is represented by legal counsel. Representative Cheney is an attorney, and an attorney who circumvents an individual’s legal representation would violate well-established attorney ethics standards and the Washington D.C. Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, regardless of who initiates the contact. 82 While it is not clear how the D.C. Bar would apply this rule to an attorney who also sits as a Member of Congress, its rules state that “a lawyer shall not communicate or cause another to communicate about the subject of the representation with a person known to be represented by another lawyer in the matter. . . .”83 This appears to be precisely what Representative Cheney did at this time, and within a matter of days of these secret conversations, Hutchinson would go on to recant her previous testimony and introduce her most outlandish claims. It must be emphasized that Representative Cheney would likely have known her communications without the knowledge of Hutchinson’s attorney were illicit and unethical at that time. Farah

Griffin indicated as much in her previously-mentioned message to Hutchinson on April 28, 2022, when she wrote that Representative Cheney’s “one concern” was that as long as Hutchinson was represented by counsel, “she [Cheney] can’t really ethically talk to you [Hutchinson] without him [Passantino].”84 Despite Representative Cheney’s initial hesitation, the Subcommittee uncovered evidence of frequent, direct conversations between Hutchinson and Representative Cheney without Passantino’s knowledge, and also through their intermediary Farah Griffin.85 Understandably, Representative Cheney attempted to distance herself from the appearance of impropriety in her memoir published in the aftermath of the Select Committee. In her words, she was “sympathetic to [Hutchinson’s] situation, but [Representative Cheney] did not want our committee to be advising her on what to do next.”86 It remains to be determined why Representative Cheney would allegedly avoid communicating with Hutchinson in April because of her commitment to ethics but would communicate with her frequently under those same circumstances in May and June as the date of their televised hearing grew closer.


Vice Chair Cheney Covertly Assisted Hutchinson and Influenced Her to Fire Her Attorney Representative Cheney’s influence on Hutchinson went beyond contacting Hutchinson directly. Representative Cheney played a primary role in Hutchinson firing her current, free-to-her legal counsel Passantino, and even provided Hutchinson with a list of attorneys that would likely contribute to building the Select Committee’s narrative.87 The account of how Hutchinson terminated her counsel and hired new counsel varies in important ways between Hutchinson’s and Representative Cheney’s respective memoirs, both published in the aftermath of the Select Committee.

https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf

 

[ColonelAngus]

Let me guess.

THE LIZ CHENEY TEXTS TO CASSIDY HUTCHINSON WERE CREATED BY PUTIN!

They are FAKE! RUSSIA DID IT!

 

[struth]

Let me guess.

THE LIZ CHENEY TEXTS TO CASSIDY HUTCHINSON WERE CREATED BY PUTIN!

They are FAKE! RUSSIA DID IT!

“The next day, she [Representative Cheney] called and provided me [Hutchinson] with contact information for multiple attorneys at various firms.”91 In addition, the Signal messages recovered by Chairman Loudermilk demonstrate that Representative Cheney and Hutchinson spoke directly with one another several days before Hutchinson ultimately terminated her attorney.92 What other information was communicated during these phone calls may never be known, but what is known is that Representative Cheney consciously attempted to minimize her contact with Hutchinson in her book, and the most likely reason to try to bury that information would be if Representative Cheney knew that it was improper and unethical to communicate with Hutchinson without her counsel present. On June 9, 2022, Hutchinson formally ended her attorney-client relationship with her first attorney, Stefan Passantino.93 That same day, she retained attorneys Bill Jordan and Jody Hunt of Alston & Bird, at the recommendation of Representative Cheney.

https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf

This ladies and gentlemen is what witness tampering actually looks like.

 

[ColonelAngus]

“The next day, she [Representative Cheney] called and provided me [Hutchinson] with contact information for multiple attorneys at various firms.”91 In addition, the Signal messages recovered by Chairman Loudermilk demonstrate that Representative Cheney and Hutchinson spoke directly with one another several days before Hutchinson ultimately terminated her attorney.92 What other information was communicated during these phone calls may never be known, but what is known is that Representative Cheney consciously attempted to minimize her contact with Hutchinson in her book, and the most likely reason to try to bury that information would be if Representative Cheney knew that it was improper and unethical to communicate with Hutchinson without her counsel present. On June 9, 2022, Hutchinson formally ended her attorney-client relationship with her first attorney, Stefan Passantino.93 That same day, she retained attorneys Bill Jordan and Jody Hunt of Alston & Bird, at the recommendation of Representative Cheney.

https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf

This ladies and gentlemen is what witness tampering actually looks like.

Thanks so much for sharing that.

Fantastic post!

Now the cult fucks will call you a racist in 3….2…1….

 

[Rawley]

It’s up to the witness whether or not they request an attorney being present dumbfuk

Nope, dumfuk

 

[Lesh]

Nope, dumfuk

Prove that. And do it with something at least a month old.

 

[struth]

Prove that. And do it with something at least a month old.

“The next day, she [Representative Cheney] called and provided me [Hutchinson] with contact information for multiple attorneys at various firms.”91 In addition, the Signal messages recovered by Chairman Loudermilk demonstrate that Representative Cheney and Hutchinson spoke directly with one another several days before Hutchinson ultimately terminated her attorney.92 What other information was communicated during these phone calls may never be known, but what is known is that Representative Cheney consciously attempted to minimize her contact with Hutchinson in her book, and the most likely reason to try to bury that information would be if Representative Cheney knew that it was improper and unethical to communicate with Hutchinson without her counsel present. On June 9, 2022, Hutchinson formally ended her attorney-client relationship with her first attorney, Stefan Passantino.93 That same day, she retained attorneys Bill Jordan and Jody Hunt of Alston & Bird, at the recommendation of Representative Cheney.


https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/...7DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf


This is what witness tampering looks like.

 

[Rawley]

Prove that. And do it with something at least a month old.

I did sweetpea, but your ignorance or Trump hate (both?) seems impenetrable.

 

[Zincwarrior]

“The next day, she [Representative Cheney] called and provided me [Hutchinson] with contact information for multiple attorneys at various firms.”91 In addition, the Signal messages recovered by Chairman Loudermilk demonstrate that Representative Cheney and Hutchinson spoke directly with one another several days before Hutchinson ultimately terminated her attorney.92 What other information was communicated during these phone calls may never be known, but what is known is that Representative Cheney consciously attempted to minimize her contact with Hutchinson in her book, and the most likely reason to try to bury that information would be if Representative Cheney knew that it was improper and unethical to communicate with Hutchinson without her counsel present. On June 9, 2022, Hutchinson formally ended her attorney-client relationship with her first attorney, Stefan Passantino.93 That same day, she retained attorneys Bill Jordan and Jody Hunt of Alston & Bird, at the recommendation of Representative Cheney.


https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/...7DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf


This is what witness tampering looks like.

Your argument consists of Cheney - after being contacted by the witness directly - giving said witness of list of unbiased attorneys than the one paid by the subject of the hearing itself was somehow illegal?

 

[Rawley]

Maybe the poster children for the military industrial complex, THE CHENEYS, do not want Trump in office because they are war criminals and Trump is antiwar.

You cult sheep do not think for yourselves. You are stupid dirty minges.

"Minge" LOL - I'm going to have to steal that.

 

[struth]

Your argument consists of Cheney - after being contacted by the witness directly - giving said witness of list of unbiased attorneys than the one paid by the subject of the hearing itself was somehow illegal?

hhahah no, that's one part of the report, Liz contacted the witness, who was represented....then, Liz gave her a list of attorneys, that she approved of. Then the witness's testmony changed.....and of course, others came forward calling her a liar, and Liz refused to allow them to testify.

 

[Godboy]

PJMedia crap. Cheney committed no crime.

Then why are people calling on Biden to pardon her?