Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[Zincwarrior]

hhahah no, that's one part of the report, Liz contacted the witness, who was represented....then, Liz gave her a list of attorneys, that she approved of. Then the witness's testmony changed.....and of course, others came forward calling her a liar, and Liz refused to allow them to testify.

Your argument is that was illegal?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then why are people calling on Biden to pardon her?

Use your own logic as to why Trump has considered pardoning himself and his violent insurrectionist cultists.

Take some time with it.

 

[struth]

Your argument is that was illegal?

yes, it's called witness tampering. Read the report. I provided a link to the entire report. I also provided a link to the federal code.

You think it's legal for a member of Congress to contact a witness, that's represented, get them to change their testimony, and hire a lawyer that will help them lie? Are you crazy?

 

[Godboy]

The DoJ cannot compel testimony without having a basis for doing so. Their power is not unlimited.

Then if they do compel her testimony, then they obviously have a basis for it.

 

[struth]

Use your own logic as to why Trump has considered pardoning himself and his violent insurrectionist cultists.

Take some time with it.

he hasn't...in fact just the opposite.,

"I did nothing wrong"

Meanwhile, Xiden is giving his family blanket pardons. That's reality

 

[Zincwarrior]

You think it's legal for a member of Congress to contact a witness, that's represented, get them to change their testimony, and hire a lawyer that will help them lie? Are you crazy?

Witness contacted the Congress person first and provided a list of neutral nonTrump paid attorneys. Congress members contact witnesses all the time. Thats how they get them to the hearings. Its not a trial.

Sorry, I thought there was something else.

 

[Godboy]

Witness contacted the Congress person first and provided a list of neutral nonTrump paid attorneys. Congress members contact witnesses all the time. Thats how they get them to the hearings. Its not a trial.

Sorry, I thought there was something else.

Im hearing that what she did was illegal. Your ignorant thoughts on this are unconvincing. Besides, there are always novel legal theories that can be employed to financially crush her and perhaps send her to prison.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Im hearing that what she did was illegal. Your ignorant thoughts on this are unconvincing. Besides, there are always novel legal theories that can be employed to financially crush her and perhaps send her to prison.

Excellent!

 

[struth]

Witness contacted the Congress person first and provided a list of neutral nonTrump paid attorneys. Congress members contact witnesses all the time. Thats how they get them to the hearings. Its not a trial.

Sorry, I thought there was something else.

Wrong, it's not normal, highly unethical, and potentially illegal for a member of congress to contact a witness represented by counsel, and get them to change their testimony.

The fact you and your dembot friends think it's ok for members of congress to tamper with witnesses and get them to change their testimony is alarming.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Wrong, it's not normal, highly unethical, and potentially illegal for a member of congress to contact a witness represented by counsel, and get them to change their testimony.

Please cite evidence to support your statement.

 

[struth]

Please cite evidence to support your statement.

Omg you dembot. I’ve provided a link to the federal criminal code

As well as to the report by the US congress

 

[Zincwarrior]

Omg you dembot. I’ve provided a link to the federal criminal code

As well as to the report by the US congress

Thats the code for trials. Please show support that Congress people don't talk with witnesses for hearings.

 

[ColonelAngus]

hhahah no, that's one part of the report, Liz contacted the witness, who was represented....then, Liz gave her a list of attorneys, that she approved of. Then the witness's testmony changed.....and of course, others came forward calling her a liar, and Liz refused to allow them to testify.

Nope. You are racist!

 

[Jroc]

Listen to my claims very carefully Shortbus, it's multifaceted.

1. Is that its fucking hilarious that you think Republicans essentially calling in a tip line is some big news in criminal justice while at the same time ignoring the criminal conviction of Trump as political.


2. Liz Cheney isn't a cop, nor was she conducting a criminal investigation. If she violated some political rule on how politicians go about handling their political theater then the consequences to that will likely be political, not criminal but you morons can't help falling for Republican grifts.

Your TDS obvious New York change the law so as they can prosecute Trump for some b*******.. witness tampering is a criminal offense which should be prosecuted by the justice department...you to give a crap about any illegalities as long as they were trying to get Trump while they were doing it pretty pathetic

 

[Jroc]

Thats the code for trials. Please show support that Congress people don't talk with witnesses for hearings.

This Cheney had a one-on-one pre-testimony strategy session with one of the witnesses get that through your head..... No that's not the way it works

 

[Curried Goats]

Your TDS obvious New York change the law so as they can prosecute Trump for some b*******.. witness tampering is a criminal offense which should be prosecuted by the justice department...you to give a crap about any illegalities as long as they were trying to get Trump while they were doing it pretty pathetic

The changed the law on statutes of limitations, not what is or isn't illegal. Trump was still found to have broken the law. Moron.

 

[Jroc]

My assertion is that this is a political claim. Wake me when it actually becomes a legal one and she's actually charged with something. Until then why don't you tell me what you think of Trumps actual criminal convictions?

There were non get some help with your TDS

 

[Jroc]

Can you substantiate this claim?

That's what the indictment and the trial will be for

 

[Curried Goats]

There were non get some help with your TDS

What?

 

[struth]

Thats the code for trials. Please show support that Congress people don't talk with witnesses for hearings.

no it's not....it says official proceeding.

testimony before Congress is an official proceeding.

Definition: official proceeding from 18 USC § 1515(a)(1) | LII / Legal Information Institute

www.law.cornell.edu

It's so strange you think members of Congress can tamper with witnesses and get them to change their testimony.