FBI should probe 'potential' Liz Cheney 'witness tampering' in Jan 6 matter

[struth]

Your hypothetical is not relevant to the discussion because it does not accurately reflect the situation we are discussing.

If Hutchinson is capable of deciding what she will testify to, then there is no evidence that Cheney told her to do so.

That is completely illogical

How can anyone be guilty of witness tampering since everyone is capable od deciding what they’ll testify to?

What a dumb thing to suggest

 

[Marener]

That is completely illogical

How can anyone be guilty of witness tampering since everyone is capable od deciding what they’ll testify to?

What a dumb thing to suggest

Oh, well we get evidence of witness tampering by witnesses telling us that someone told them (or threatened) them to give a particular testimony.

Like when Roger Stone urged Randy Credico to lie in his testimony and was found guilty of witness tampering. Credico told the investigators and the court that he did so.

You don’t have any evidence that Cheney told Hutchinson to say anything.

 

[struth]

Oh, well we get evidence of witness tampering by witnesses telling us that someone told them (or threatened) them to give a particular testimony.

Like when Roger Stone urged Randy Credico to lie in his testimony and was found guilty of witness tampering. Credico told the investigators and the court that he did so.

You don’t have any evidence that Cheney told Hutchinson to say anything.

Ah so you are backpedaling now, you do agree that it can happen when they are told to lie. Gotcha

Well that’s what the evidence showed. The perjury came after Lizzy corrupt backdoor communications

Maybe xiden will give her a pardon

 

[Marener]

Ah so you are backpedaling now, you do agree that it can happen when they are told to lie. Gotcha

Well that’s what the evidence showed. The perjury came after Lizzy corrupt backdoor communications

Maybe xiden will give her a pardon

Did Hutchinson say that Cheney told her to lie?

 

[struth]

Did Hutchinson say that Cheney told her to lie?

So who told her to lie???

 

[Marener]

So who told her to lie???

Why do you assume anyone told her to lie?

 

[struth]

Why do you assume anyone told her to lie?

Because she lied. Lied a lot. And Cheney put her on prime time tv to conduct those lies, after having corrupt backdoor communications with her

 

[Marener]

Because she lied. Lied a lot. And Cheney put her on prime time tv to conduct those lies, after having corrupt backdoor communications with her

Is Cassidy Hutchinson incapable of deciding the content of her testimony without someone telling her what to say?

If she is, then your assumption someone told her to lie is baseless as there is a logical alternative to this assumption.

 

[struth]

Is Cassidy Hutchinson incapable of deciding the content of her testimony without someone telling her what to say?

If she is, then your assumption someone told her to lie is baseless as there is a logical alternative to this assumption.

Of course she is, she in fact did, then changed her testimony and filled it with perjury after corrupt back door dealings with Lizzy

 

[Marener]

Of course she is, she in fact did, then changed her testimony and filled it with perjury after corrupt back door dealings with Lizzy

So your assumption is baseless. Thanks.

 

[struth]

So your assumption is baseless. Thanks.

I made no assumption

My statement is based on fscts

Hence why Liz has a criminal referral for witness tampering

 

[Marener]

I made no assumption

My statement is based on fscts

Hence why Liz has a criminal referral for witness tampering

You assumed someone told Hutchinson to lie under oath.

It’s a baseless assumption.

 

[Rawley]

I made no assumption

My statement is based on fscts

Hence why Liz has a criminal referral for witness tampering

You're not done banging your head against that wall

 

[struth]

You assumed someone told Hutchinson to lie under oath.

It’s a baseless assumption.

It’s hardly baseless the committee report is detailed

 

[TimFitz]

The Republicans investigated and came up with nothing.

That said, it doesn’t look like they tried very hard. I don’t think the purpose of their “investigation” was to find facts that could lead to prosecution but to generate a few days of headlines in conservative media and perpetuate a narrative among their supporters who won’t bother to read their report or think about it on their own.

That’s all their investigation was intended to do.

That’s all Trump’s threats and bluster are intended to do.

They will conduct a Cheney witch hunt. Made for cable tv. It won’t matter whether they can charge anyone.

As long as they keep recycling the same allegations over and over again. Always pretending that each repetition is breaking news.

that’s how the GOP House handles investigations.

 

[Godboy]

All she did was testify as to what Ornato told her. She never claimed to have witnessed anything that happened in the vehicle.

You obviously are not well informed.

She lied about the entire story and the lie was extrenely poorly crafted.

 

[Winco]

Ashlie Babbitt is still dead.
She prompted her own death......FACT.
Dumb Ashlie Babbitt.........Should NOT have entered a Restricted Area.

 

[Winco]

Good Luck hunting down Liz.

Her old man .......... enough said.
Just wait for it.

 

[Marener]

It’s hardly baseless the committee report is detailed

It details communications between Cheney and Hutchinson, but that’s not illegal.

So the accusation is baseless.

 

[struth]

It details communications between Cheney and Hutchinson, but that’s not illegal.

So the accusation is baseless.

sure it is, when it's witness tampering.