Your particular fanciful spin on the definitions don’t control. If I say something fully correct but you claim im wrong, that doesn’t mean I have any reason to think my initial claim is a wrong. It’s simply a matter of me not accepting your word.
If I am mistaken in the first place, and you “correct” me, I’m still not bound to believe you. I place little to no stock in your word, for example. So, I continue to repeat my original contention. Still not a lie. Wrong maybe. But a “lie?” Nope. Not at all.
If I receive information that my original assertion is incorrect and I willfully agree gnome the inaccuracy in trying to foistnof the claim anyway, finally we are discussing an”lie.”
Schmucks like you don’t get to state that Trump “knew” any particular thing. At least when you try to claim that you know what he allegedly knew, your assertion has no value.
Your posts are generally devoid of value precisely because you insist on making claims you can’t possibly know.