Live J6 Hearing...

[Fort Fun Indiana]

now there's a contradiction in terms

yeah, ya did well for yourself here playing the "M" to my "S"

This self fellation won't help you.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

This self fellation won't help you.

I'll take your word for that

 

[Delldude]

v v

^ ^


agreed

LOL

Your question is stupid. What you are accidentally talking about is a well known phenomenon that certain edcated people learn about in college.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

LOL

he leads with his chin

 

[Delldude]

he leads with his chin

Possible double naught spy?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Since 98%+ of trump supporting RWI's won't be watching the 'hearing', we can discuss without much interruption.

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?

www.usmessageboard.com

They will be doing this.......making excuses and calling the committee traitors.

Ready. Set. Lie! Trump Team All Prepared For Jan. 6 Hearings

The former president and his defenders are whitewashing the committee’s presentation before it has even begun. WASHINGTON ― As the bipartisan House Jan. 6 committee prepares to detail how Donald Trump tried to overthrow democracy to remain in power, the former president and his allies are...

www.usmessageboard.com

/——/ Allow me to interrupt.

Jan. 6 committee will not make any criminal referrals, chairman says

Rep. Bennie Thompson indicated it's up to the Justice Department to decide on its own whether to pursue criminal prosecutions.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Possible double naught spy?

triple

 

[Faun]

So where was the cross examination of witnesses and evidence?
I saw a lot of 'poor baby' but no attempts to assassinate testimony or evidence.

The rules you posted said nothing about "cross examination of witnesses and evidence."

Try harder.

 

[Delldude]

The rules you posted said nothing about "cross examination of witnesses and evidence."

Try harder.

I guess one can't cross examine witnesses when all the people on the committee don't want to have any cross.

Go for it.

 

[Faun]

I guess one can't cross examine witnesses when all the people on the committee don't want to have any cross.

Go for it.

What a shame McCarthy chose to boycott that committee.

 

[Delldude]

What a shame McCarthy chose to boycott that committee.

You sure it wasn't Pelosi who didn't want any members that would cross examine her 'hand picked' witnesses?

 

[Faun]

You sure it wasn't Pelosi who didn't want any members that would cross examine her 'hand picked' witnesses?

Yes, I'm sure.

 

[Delldude]

Yes, I'm sure.

That would have complicated the show trial by providing counter debate and other evidence.

 

[Faun]

That would have complicated the show trial by providing counter debate and other evidence.

Nope.

 

[Delldude]

Nope.

That is exactly why Pelosi rejected the GOP members McCarthy provided.

 

[Faun]

That is exactly why Pelosi rejected the GOP members McCarthy provided.

She rejected them because of their support for Trump's Big Lie. She accepted the other three and asked McCarthy to name just 2 others. He chose to pull the other 3 and not name anyone.

If you feel there was a lack of "cross examination," That's on McCarthy who chose to boycott the committee.

 

[Delldude]

She rejected them because of their support for Trump's Big Lie. She accepted the other three and asked McCarthy to name just 2 others. He chose to pull the other 3 and not name anyone.

If you feel there was a lack of "cross examination," That's on McCarthy who chose to boycott the committee.

The three were prepared to put up a good defense against the selectively chosen 'evidence' and she knew it. Supporting 'Trump's Big Lie' is no reason for gamesmanship over a highly political, partisan exercise.

 

[Faun]

The three were prepared to put up a good defense against the selectively chosen 'evidence' and she knew it. Supporting 'Trump's Big Lie' is no reason for gamesmanship over a highly political, partisan exercise.

And Pelosi accepted those 3. So there goes your argument.

As far as Banks and Jordan, it made no sense to impanel members who believed the election was stolen and considered the thugs who stormed the Capitol were "patriots."

 

[Delldude]

And Pelosi accepted those 3. So there goes your argument.

As far as Banks and Jordan, it made no sense to impanel members who believed the election was stolen and considered the thugs who stormed the Capitol were "patriots."

So how did three become Cheney and Kinzinger?

With your metric, would it make sense to impanel a committee who's soul purpose in life for the past 4-5 years was to get Trump?

 

[Faun]

So how did three become Cheney and Kinzinger?

With your metric, would it make sense to impanel a committee who's soul purpose in life for the past 4-5 years was to get Trump?

Pelosi invited them to join and they accepted.