Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[alang1216]

I was an 11 year old molested by an adult. Luckily for me, it did not progress to rape.

You want 11 year old boys to be trained to see getting fucked as FUN.

No, I want young boys and girls to recognize rape for what it is and be empowered to say no.

Sorry to hear of your experience. Did you understand what was happening to you?

 

[alang1216]

So, books that instruct a boy how to give and receive oral and anal sex with grown men are “tools to defend themselves”?

These are not books to protect them from being molested. These are books to condition them to accept being molested.

And I do not think anyone needs to guess why it is that you want this kind of material to be provided to young boys. We're not allowed to say it, here, but your motive is plenty obvious.

When you get to Hell, look up Richard Ray Pierce (1942-1980). It is almost certain that you will wind up in the same part of Hell where he is. I think you'll find that you two have much in common.

Have you read the books or did you just hear selected (cherry-picked) sections? I haven't read them but your claim doesn't pass the smell test.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No, I want young boys and girls to recognize rape for what it is and be empowered to say no.

By giving them books that tell them that it is normal and proper for grown men to be fucking them?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Have you read the books or did you just hear selected (cherry-picked) sections? I haven't read them but your claim doesn't pass the smell test.

The cherry-picked parts are quite good enough. The passages that Senator Kennedy read are damning. There is no case that you can make to argue that the passages that he read, and is show in video earlier is this thread reading, have any place in books aimed at minors.

In other threads, there have been other excerpts of material from “Gender Queer” that are equally damming.

It tells us that you are some sort of evil, soulless, subhuman piece of shit, that you would even think of defending such content in books meant for minors.

It tells us something else about you, that we're not allowed to say here, but it's pretty damn obvious. There is only one kind of fucked-up subhuman piece of shit that wants minors to be provided with material that tells them that it's OK for grown men to fuck them.

Give my regards to my father-in-law, when you arrive in Hell. You're certain to wind up the the same neighborhood down there, where he is.

 

[Seymour Flops]

By giving them books that tell them that it is normal and proper for grown men to be fucking them?

Thank you for putting it so bluntly.

Pedocrats count on us being too civil to call their policies out accurately.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

No, I want young boys and girls to recognize rape for what it is and be empowered to say no.

Sorry to hear of your experience. Did you understand what was happening to you?

I did not understand while being groomed, but I sure did when groped.

Teaching 11 year boys that they will enjoy being sodomized is NOT empowering them. Quite the opposite. It is grooming them.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I suppose a person does have to admire the chutzpa.

Yes -- teaching your 11 year old boy that he will enjoy taking it up the butt will give him the confidence to say no when somebody wants to do just that!

What's next, teaching your 9 year old girl that Semen tastes just like candy will help her when a group of men are about to turn her into a cum dumpster?

Do people even read the stupid shit they write?

 

[MinTrut]

What are you babbling about? You drunk again?

Drunk with confusion, bruh.

So you SUPPORT the presence of books in school libraries that extoll the virtues of child murder, kidnapping, rape, trafficking and so forth, and make heroes of the sexual predators?

 

[MinTrut]

No, I don’t. Having free speech doesn’t mean we don’t have at least some common morals with which we all agree. If aren’t going to censory anything from anybody, why not have XXX porn on the shelves in elemetary schools? Why not have books describing how to rob banks and get away with it. How about books on how to kill people and why that is a good thing? Some form of censorship must exist in an orderly society. The issue we have in this country is we can no longer agree(as a group) what is beneficial and what is detrimental for an orderly society. The main issue in the US is the incrementalism towards perversion, which is promoted by the left. For example, for now, the vast majority of us, minus a few extremists, can agree that murder is immoral and detrimental. Not very long ago, most of us could agree, minus a few extremists, that explicit porn should not be allowed in public school libraries. There must be a line drawn somewhere if we are to live in an orderly society. If people want to call that censorship, then so be it.

I'm very confused by your stance.

You WANT a book which glamorizes the kidnapping, torture, rape and murder of children, and which features adults marrying children - including a toddler of 3 - in school libraries?

And you're drawing a line which says the above is okay, but another book with a brief passage about anal sex between two consenting males is NOT okay?

Do you see why I'm confused by this?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What's next, teaching your 9 year old girl that Semen tastes just like candy will help her when a group of men are about to turn her into a cum dumpster?

My wife was eight when her father started doing that to her.

That went on for a couple years, before he cured himself with a .357-caliber lobotomy.

I think that a similar procedure would do a lot of good, if applied to alang1216.

 

[MinTrut]

Yeah, it is very easy to see that the major tenants of the Bible are very beneficial to society whereas the major tenants of porn are not. It really is as simple as that. I have never understood why those in favor of an orderly society would be against the major tenants of the Bible, even atheists. Whether atheists believe these ideas are directly from God or not is irrelevant to their inherent benefits to a well functioning society. I guess I don’t really understand how anyone can’t see the detrimental affects of porn, particularly on children.

The Bible makes heroes of child predators - kidnappers, rapists, murderers.

You're okay with that in a school library?

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Don't expect any Democrat or leftist to denounce it on here

But WAT?

 

[MinTrut]

Stay on topic which is about keeping or prohibiting porn in schools. Where do you stand?

Can you clarify where you stand?

Do you believe the Bible should be banned from school libraries?

 

[MinTrut]

The books aren't banned. You can still buy and show your kids gay porn at home, relax.

It just doesn't belong in the school library.

Are you yet ANOTHER conservative seeking to ban the Bible from school libraries?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Can you clarify where you stand?

Do you believe the Bible should be banned from school libraries?

The Bible is already banned.

But, If the Bible promotes adult-child sexual fantasies, then, yes. Can you show a passage where that exists.

 

[MinTrut]

They don't realize that is what they are defacto doing though. If those on the left were capable of actual critical thinking or cared to do their own research rather than regurgitate the innuendo, assigned talking points, propaganda, very few of them would be leftist.

So you must want the Bible banned from school libraries.

It makes heroes of child rapists/traffickers/murderers.

If not, according to your expressed standards, you are LITERALLY defending these things.

 

[LeftofLeft]

So you must want the Bible banned from school libraries.

It makes heroes of child rapists/traffickers/murderers.

If not, according to your expressed standards, you are LITERALLY defending these things.

Show us a passage or two.

 

[MinTrut]

I do not want inappropriate material included in the school library.

Is the Bible appropriate?

It glamorizes child rape/murder/trafficking.

I will not allow you or anybody else define what I consider inappropriate

So you're okay with books which glamorize the sexual predation of children, and will NOT be talked out of this?

when you do so maliciously and dishonestly.

No malice, no dishonesty.

The two books Senator Kennedy was reading from are two that I definitely consider inappropriate however.

See above.

FYI the rating by most thoughtful rating services say THE COLOR PURPLE is not appropriate for children younger than 14+.

Agreed, but should it be banned?

It's far tamer than the Bible.

It should not be in an elementary school library.

Agreed.

Anybody who would recommend it for young children should not be allowed to be in any aspect of public education.

Same for the Bible, right?

 

[Wiggle_Piggy]

we keep seeing LGBTQ books in schools be riddled with examples of perversion and pornography.

Then, when we want to get rid of the filth, the left victimizes that were transphobic?

So they equate the trans movement with perversion and pornography.. it’s quite an admission

 

[MinTrut]

You misunderstood me. I'm fine with me deciding what my child reads but I'm not OK with you banning books that I might want my child to have access to.

^ Too fucking sensible.