Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Mind your business. Other people's pregnancies are not your business. DO you tell others how to eat, exercise, etc? DO you provide care for pregnant mothers.
get a life. or don't you have one? or do you ignore people close to you as you're on a mission?
Maybe you can leave others alone?Maybe you could tell us which abortion procedure doctors use to save a woman's life. You can not and will not, because abortion procedures are never used to save the life of a mother.
Murder? Killing of another human being?Then other people's murder isn't our business either......
The state prosecutes murders in the name of the state.Then other people's murder isn't our business either......
Shut the fuck up, socialist forced birther retard.Is it time to go after the term "pro-life"? Great question. Blow is a snippet of a convo.
a guest wrote:
I wish people would stop calling the forced birth movement "pro-life." There is no pro-life movement; there is only a movement to force women to carry pregnancy to term. A pro-life movement would support expanded Medicaid, expanded child care, expanded parental leave, the prosecution of dead-beat dads, meal programs for schools and regulation of guns, including an assault weapons ban. Do you think if campaigns attacked that nomenclature, it would accelerate states to end abortion bans?
Opinion Columnist replied:
I use the term "forced birth" for the same reason you explain. Challenging language such as "pro-life" likely would not be decisive, but it could play a role in shaping the discussion. Remember: pro-choice and pro-autonomy forces have already won the argument. More than 60 percent of Americans agree with them. They've also won practically every abortion-related ballot fight since the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision. Now, it's a matter of ending gerrymandered districts and removing the state legislators who are sheltered from accountability.
We are. That’s why the abortion bans.Mind your business.
Back when a sense of right and wrong, ethics, moral center, integrity was the norm among Americans there was simply no question that the doctor did what he/she could to save both the mother and unborn child. On very rare occasions that was not possible and the mother--or the father if the mother was not conscious--made the choice. Sometimes the choice was for the life of the child; probably more often the choice was for the life of the mother most especially if she had other children who needed her.Here we have a whole lot of Doctors who say that they can save the life of a mother without killing the baby in the womb....
Is abortion needed to save the lives of women? The data says no.
Even back in 2013, a study to determine “why women seek abortion in the US” found that only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
The reality is that women don’t require abortion to save their lives. As of January 2023, the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that only 0.2 percent of abortions occurred due to “risk to the woman’s life or a major bodily function” (emphasis mine).
“Nothing could be further from the truth” than the idea that abortion is “medically necessary” to save a woman’s life, said Dr. Anthony Levatino — an obstetrician-gynecologist and board member of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) — in an interview with Live Action.
Levatino, who worked at one of the top high-risk obstetrics hospitals in America for nine years, said he’s “saved hundreds of women from life-threatening pregnancies” through early induction and C-sections, never once having to deliberately kill a child in the process.
-------
only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
We Can Save A Woman's Life Without Ending Her Unborn Child's
More than 1,000 OB-GYNs and healthcare experts have determined, in their experience, that abortion is never necessary to save a woman’s life.thefederalist.com
xWe are. That’s why the abortion bans.
Learn how to mind your business, you worthless retard.
xxxShut the fuck up, socialist forced birther retard.
We don’t have to advocate for any of your drivel, and even if we did, you would still promote killing kids.
Back when a sense of right and wrong, ethics, moral center, integrity was the norm among Americans there was simply no question that the doctor did what he/she could to save both the mother and unborn child. On very rare occasions that was not possible and the mother--or the father if the mother was not conscious--made the choice. Sometimes the choice was for the life of the child; probably more often the choice was for the life of the mother most especially if she had other children who needed her.
The issue of whether it was her right to end a pregnancy pretty much never factored into those decisions. It was simply a heart wrenching choice that had to be made.
We were a more ethical and moral people when things were that way.
Maternal mortality rates include deaths as a result of abortion. They’re pretty much meaningless in this discussion.The percentage of woman dying from child birth is very low when calculated at 100,000 live births. But it can happen. Still you got to love men talking about giving birth when it is something that they will never have to experience it.
Maternal Mortality Rates in the United States, 2020
National Center for Health Statisticswww.cdc.gov
It is only included in the time range that they have decided that it is included.Maternal mortality rates include deaths as a result of abortion. They’re pretty much meaningless in this discussion.
www.mayoclinic.org
www.cdc.gov
Life of the mother is worthless! Good post!Here we have a whole lot of Doctors who say that they can save the life of a mother without killing the baby in the womb....
Is abortion needed to save the lives of women? The data says no.
Even back in 2013, a study to determine “why women seek abortion in the US” found that only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
The reality is that women don’t require abortion to save their lives. As of January 2023, the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that only 0.2 percent of abortions occurred due to “risk to the woman’s life or a major bodily function” (emphasis mine).
“Nothing could be further from the truth” than the idea that abortion is “medically necessary” to save a woman’s life, said Dr. Anthony Levatino — an obstetrician-gynecologist and board member of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) — in an interview with Live Action.
Levatino, who worked at one of the top high-risk obstetrics hospitals in America for nine years, said he’s “saved hundreds of women from life-threatening pregnancies” through early induction and C-sections, never once having to deliberately kill a child in the process.
-------
only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
We Can Save A Woman's Life Without Ending Her Unborn Child's
More than 1,000 OB-GYNs and healthcare experts have determined, in their experience, that abortion is never necessary to save a woman’s life.
Please note this article was printed in India and it's ranking as a reliable scientific institution was ranked in 6, 000 + place.Here we have a whole lot of Doctors who say that they can save the life of a mother without killing the baby in the womb....
Is abortion needed to save the lives of women? The data says no.
Even back in 2013, a study to determine “why women seek abortion in the US” found that only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
The reality is that women don’t require abortion to save their lives. As of January 2023, the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that only 0.2 percent of abortions occurred due to “risk to the woman’s life or a major bodily function” (emphasis mine).
“Nothing could be further from the truth” than the idea that abortion is “medically necessary” to save a woman’s life, said Dr. Anthony Levatino — an obstetrician-gynecologist and board member of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) — in an interview with Live Action.
Levatino, who worked at one of the top high-risk obstetrics hospitals in America for nine years, said he’s “saved hundreds of women from life-threatening pregnancies” through early induction and C-sections, never once having to deliberately kill a child in the process.
-------
only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
We Can Save A Woman's Life Without Ending Her Unborn Child's
More than 1,000 OB-GYNs and healthcare experts have determined, in their experience, that abortion is never necessary to save a woman’s life.
This is bull you brownshirt fascist .H ow dare you think you have the right to control a women's body and the fetus. You procreative god worshipping peverts, you are all wrong whether you like it or not .There is no such thing as an unborn child. You are putting a nail to your own coffin against your sexual behavior and reproduction and life style if you don't change your ways.Here we have a whole lot of Doctors who say that they can save the life of a mother without killing the baby in the womb....
Is abortion needed to save the lives of women? The data says no.
Even back in 2013, a study to determine “why women seek abortion in the US” found that only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
The reality is that women don’t require abortion to save their lives. As of January 2023, the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that only 0.2 percent of abortions occurred due to “risk to the woman’s life or a major bodily function” (emphasis mine).
“Nothing could be further from the truth” than the idea that abortion is “medically necessary” to save a woman’s life, said Dr. Anthony Levatino — an obstetrician-gynecologist and board member of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) — in an interview with Live Action.
Levatino, who worked at one of the top high-risk obstetrics hospitals in America for nine years, said he’s “saved hundreds of women from life-threatening pregnancies” through early induction and C-sections, never once having to deliberately kill a child in the process.
-------
only 12 percent of women cited “health-related reasons” for their decision to abort. These “reasons,” though, could be anything from back pain to mental health concerns — many times a far cry from “medically necessary.” In fact, this study found that the “most frequently mentioned theme” mothers referenced for ending the lives of their unborn children was related to finances.
We Can Save A Woman's Life Without Ending Her Unborn Child's
More than 1,000 OB-GYNs and healthcare experts have determined, in their experience, that abortion is never necessary to save a woman’s life.
Negative human population growth would be a blessing to this world , might even save US from.oursekves.Perhaps we don't need any women getting pregnant. Imagine zero pregnancies. No abortions, no arguing. Problem solved.
Because you are the judge of that.I have already stated that mothers have an equal right to life as the unborn child has
Thats the only time they have a moral right to kill their baby
