Libertarians Are The True Political Moderates

[kaz]

Nope. Money is what wins elections. That and making the American people think you have easy solutions to problems that no one can fix even with their best efforts.

Yes, money wins elections and buys votes. Once again, you show yourself to be the liar that you are. You want more power for that which you say is corrupt, the US government.



It's about your welfare check, just be honest. Whoever puts the most zeroes on it ... gets your vote ...

You have no ability to put words in the mouths of others, so stop trying. And I haven't said the government is corrupt, that must be someone else you are attempting to speak for and they probably didn't say that either, based on your track record.

You said corporations spend lots of money on elections to get rid of their competition.

What? I didn't say government is corrupt. WTF?

You never said what you said, did you? You're an island girl in a grass skirt.

Libertarians realize that government is bought, so if you limit it's size, there is just less to buy. Pretty darned moderate, don't you think?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Taliban assisted them, they richly deserved to pay dearly for that.

Either way they're back now so there you go. Considering where the hijackers came from I would have thought Saudi Arabia would have been your target.

Why would I blame the historical home of the hijackers over the country that helped them do it? That doesn't make sense, even for you.

Where do you think the money for all that he did came from, North Dakota?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Libertarians realize that government is bought, so if you limit it's size, there is just less to buy. Pretty darned moderate, don't you think?

Nope. That's just ideology. A moderate tries to work the problem in a rational way, starting at the root of the problem, which is money mixing with politics.

 

[kaz]

Either way they're back now so there you go. Considering where the hijackers came from I would have thought Saudi Arabia would have been your target.

Why would I blame the historical home of the hijackers over the country that helped them do it? That doesn't make sense, even for you.

Where do you think the money for all that he did came from, North Dakota?

If you have proof that the government of Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11, show it. That some Saudis were behind it doesn't mean you attack the country. It's not like the Taliban, you'd have to be a moron though not to know the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan was directly behind the attack. Which thoroughly explains your position on the matter...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Which explains why they don't want anyone but them spending money, doesn't it?

Why would they? The powers that be like to stay that way, and the American people let them.

In fact you advocate it. Money wins elections, let's make government stronger!

All I said was money wins elections. The rest you made up.

 

[kaz]

Libertarians realize that government is bought, so if you limit it's size, there is just less to buy. Pretty darned moderate, don't you think?

Nope. That's just ideology. A moderate tries to work the problem in a rational way, starting at the root of the problem, which is money mixing with politics.

And an extremist wants to grow a government that it says was bought by corporations. You know, you.

 

[kaz]

Why would they? The powers that be like to stay that way, and the American people let them.

In fact you advocate it. Money wins elections, let's make government stronger!

All I said was money wins elections. The rest you made up.

You also said corporations put money into elections to eliminate their competition. Again, ironically it's true, and you don't believe it since you want to make the government you say is controlled by corporations stronger.

The word you are starts with "l." And ends with "iar." Do you know what it is?

I'm a libertarian. I don't want corporations, the rich, unions, special interests or George Soros to make my choices for me. I don't want government to confiscate my money and redistributed it for people to vote for them, I don't want government to tell me what I can do with my body.

I'm a moderate who wants to have a government to perform functions that only government can do, then I want the extremists from both sides to go away. The authoritarian leftist Marxists like you and the socons who think they own my body. I'll make my own choices, thank you very much.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why would I blame the historical home of the hijackers over the country that helped them do it? That doesn't make sense, even for you.

Where do you think the money for all that he did came from, North Dakota?

If you have proof that the government of Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11, show it. That some Saudis were behind it doesn't mean you attack the country. It's not like the Taliban, you'd have to be a moron though not to know the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan was directly behind the attack. Which thoroughly explains your position on the matter...

The Taliban wasn't behind the attack. I'd been watching them for a decade before bin Laden came on the scene, and the money came from the Saudis, not their government. The Taliban didn't tell bin Laden to attack, they just didn't mind that he did. We are also their enemy, and the enemy of an enemy is a friend. They were friendly to bin Laden, that's all.

 

[kaz]

Where do you think the money for all that he did came from, North Dakota?

If you have proof that the government of Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11, show it. That some Saudis were behind it doesn't mean you attack the country. It's not like the Taliban, you'd have to be a moron though not to know the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan was directly behind the attack. Which thoroughly explains your position on the matter...

The Taliban wasn't behind the attack. I'd been watching them for a decade before bin Laden came on the scene, and the money came from the Saudis, not their government. The Taliban didn't tell bin Laden to attack, they just didn't mind that he did. We are also their enemy, and the enemy of an enemy is a friend. They were friendly to bin Laden, that's all.

LOL, you don't even know that Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan with the approval of the government. You don't know much. Extremists seldom do.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

In fact you advocate it. Money wins elections, let's make government stronger!

All I said was money wins elections. The rest you made up.

You also said corporations put money into elections to eliminate their competition. Again, ironically it's true, and you don't believe it since you want to make the government you say is controlled by corporations stronger.

The word you are starts with "l." And ends with "iar." Do you know what it is?

I'm a libertarian. I don't want corporations, the rich, unions, special interests or George Soros to make my choices for me. I don't want government to confiscate my money and redistributed it for people to vote for them, I don't want government to tell me what I can do with my body.

I'm a moderate who wants to have a government to perform functions that only government can do, then I want the extremists from both sides to go away. The authoritarian leftist Marxists like you and the socons who think they own my body. I'll make my own choices, thank you very much.

I lied about nothing. Corporations, like everyone else who hands in checks, does so to get their way, and they do since the government is for sale and the American people allow such a thing to happen. If you would stop jumping to conclusions, wrongly, you might just learn something.

You're so busy telling everyone what they think that you forget to ask. Next time, just ask.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If you have proof that the government of Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11, show it. That some Saudis were behind it doesn't mean you attack the country. It's not like the Taliban, you'd have to be a moron though not to know the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan was directly behind the attack. Which thoroughly explains your position on the matter...

The Taliban wasn't behind the attack. I'd been watching them for a decade before bin Laden came on the scene, and the money came from the Saudis, not their government. The Taliban didn't tell bin Laden to attack, they just didn't mind that he did. We are also their enemy, and the enemy of an enemy is a friend. They were friendly to bin Laden, that's all.

LOL, you don't even know that Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan with the approval of the government. You don't know much. Extremists seldom do.

I know where he was, and it doesn't matter. The government of Afghanistan hated us, we were, and still are, their enemy, but they didn't attack us.

And yet again, you are trying to tell me what I know, what I think, and yet again, you are wrong so stop trying.

 

[eagle1462010]

The Taliban wasn't behind the attack. I'd been watching them for a decade before bin Laden came on the scene, and the money came from the Saudis, not their government. The Taliban didn't tell bin Laden to attack, they just didn't mind that he did. We are also their enemy, and the enemy of an enemy is a friend. They were friendly to bin Laden, that's all.

LOL, you don't even know that Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan with the approval of the government. You don't know much. Extremists seldom do.

I know where he was, and it doesn't matter. The government of Afghanistan hated us, we were, and still are, their enemy, but they didn't attack us.

And yet again, you are trying to tell me what I know, what I think, and yet again, you are wrong so stop trying.

aka We should have done nothing and not went after OBL and the Al Qaeda...................

We should have said SAFE...........Like we are paying tag as kids...............I'm touching home and I'm safe.............

That's about all you comments are worth. They aided and abetted OBL and deserved to get hit.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Which explains why they don't want anyone but them spending money, doesn't it?

Wait, I thought the Left denigrated the idea that free speech was money. WTF? Can't they make up their minds?

Money isn't Free Speech, money wins elections.

Except when it doesn't.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Wait, I thought the Left denigrated the idea that free speech was money. WTF? Can't they make up their minds?

Money isn't Free Speech, money wins elections.

Except when it doesn't.

You can lose elections with money, but you can't win them without it, which is the point.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

LOL, you don't even know that Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan with the approval of the government. You don't know much. Extremists seldom do.

I know where he was, and it doesn't matter. The government of Afghanistan hated us, we were, and still are, their enemy, but they didn't attack us.

And yet again, you are trying to tell me what I know, what I think, and yet again, you are wrong so stop trying.

aka We should have done nothing and not went after OBL and the Al Qaeda...................

We should have said SAFE...........Like we are paying tag as kids...............I'm touching home and I'm safe.............

That's about all you comments are worth. They aided and abetted OBL and deserved to get hit.

What we should have done is spared no expense to mount bin Laden's head on a spike of the White House fence. Instead we went to Iraq.

Real nations kill their enemies, they don't use them as excuses to invade other nations based upon the ideology of the current President.

 

[eagle1462010]

I know where he was, and it doesn't matter. The government of Afghanistan hated us, we were, and still are, their enemy, but they didn't attack us.

And yet again, you are trying to tell me what I know, what I think, and yet again, you are wrong so stop trying.

aka We should have done nothing and not went after OBL and the Al Qaeda...................

We should have said SAFE...........Like we are paying tag as kids...............I'm touching home and I'm safe.............

That's about all you comments are worth. They aided and abetted OBL and deserved to get hit.

What we should have done is spared no expense to mount bin Laden's head on a spike of the White House fence. Instead we went to Iraq.

Real nations kill their enemies, they don't use them as excuses to invade other nations based upon the ideology of the current President.

And how would we do that with out going into Afghanistan to get him. Please spare me the he was taken in Pakistan BS as he was flushed out of Afghanistan.

According to what you've already posted, we didn't have a right to go into Afghanistan either.

You don't live in the real world do you...................And you have a problem with enemy recognition.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

aka We should have done nothing and not went after OBL and the Al Qaeda...................

We should have said SAFE...........Like we are paying tag as kids...............I'm touching home and I'm safe.............

That's about all you comments are worth. They aided and abetted OBL and deserved to get hit.

What we should have done is spared no expense to mount bin Laden's head on a spike of the White House fence. Instead we went to Iraq.

Real nations kill their enemies, they don't use them as excuses to invade other nations based upon the ideology of the current President.

And how would we do that with out going into Afghanistan to get him. Please spare me the he was taken in Pakistan BS as he was flushed out of Afghanistan.

According to what you've already posted, we didn't have a right to go into Afghanistan either.

You don't live in the real world do you...................And you have a problem with enemy recognition.

We had right to ask for him, even to go and get him, but we had no right to go to war against his landlord. That is the real world little friend.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Money isn't Free Speech, money wins elections.

Except when it doesn't.

You can lose elections with money, but you can't win them without it, which is the point.

Cantor spent more at steakhouse than Brat spent for the entire campaign.

In other words, he won without money.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Except when it doesn't.

You can lose elections with money, but you can't win them without it, which is the point.

Cantor spent more at steakhouse than Brat spent for the entire campaign.

In other words, he won without money.

Sometimes even money can't save you. Learn that, it's important to know.

 

[eagle1462010]

What we should have done is spared no expense to mount bin Laden's head on a spike of the White House fence. Instead we went to Iraq.

Real nations kill their enemies, they don't use them as excuses to invade other nations based upon the ideology of the current President.

And how would we do that with out going into Afghanistan to get him. Please spare me the he was taken in Pakistan BS as he was flushed out of Afghanistan.

According to what you've already posted, we didn't have a right to go into Afghanistan either.

You don't live in the real world do you...................And you have a problem with enemy recognition.

We had right to ask for him, even to go and get him, but we had no right to go to war against his landlord. That is the real world little friend.

The landlord was complicit in the crime, and as you have already said they are our enemies as well.

And when we did enter Afghanistan they simply weren't going to step aside and say go find him. They had to be taken on, and that is Reality.