Liberal's support for Partial-Birth Abortion proves they are awful people with no conscience

[PK1]

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

You too have no idea what "conservative" hypocrisy is. LOL.

You have no idea what conservative is.....

So tell me ... I am a libertarian like USA founding fathers were.

 

[owebo]

What is Partial-Birth Abortion?

Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which the abortionist pulls a living baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the opening to the womb). The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal tube called a trochar. He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and removes the baby's brain with a powerful suction machine. This causes the skull to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead baby.

What is the Partial-Birth Abortion act?

The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act would ban performance of a partial-birth abortion except if it were necessary to the save a mother's life. The bill defines partial-birth abortion as an abortion in which “the person performing the abortion deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother,” and then kills the baby. The bill would permit use of the procedure if “necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.”

Are Partial-Birth Abortions Common?

According to Ron Fitzsimmons, executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers (1997), and other sources, it appears that partial-birth abortions are performed 3,000 to 5,000 times annually. (Even those numbers may be low.) Based on published interviews with numerous abortionists, and interviews with Fitzsimmons in 1997, the “vast majority” of partial-birth abortions are performed in the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy, on healthy babies of healthy mothers.

Why is it called "Partial-Birth"?

Under state laws, a “live birth” occurs when a baby is entirely expelled from the mother and shows any signs of life, however briefly -- regardless of whether the baby is “viable,” i.e., developed enough to be sustained outside the womb with neo-natal medical assistance. Even at 4½ months (20 weeks), perinatologists say that if a baby is expelled or removed completely from the uterus, she will usually gasp for breath and sometimes survive for hours, even though lung development is usually insufficient to permit successful sustained respiration until 23 weeks. Thus, the term “partial-birth” is perfectly descriptive.

The Facts of Partial-Birth Abortion

The fact is, liberals are awful people who stopped developing morally at the age of 12-years-old and never developed a mature sense of the difference between right and wrong. Their support for partial-birth abortion proves that level of moral immaturity.

There is no such procedure called "Partial Birth Abortion". You are a liar and you know you a liar.

You mean the abortion where liberals partially birth the baby the snip it's spinal cord with scissors to kill it and protect the parts for maximum profit?

 

[owebo]

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

"Murder" of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

In other words, they don't understand what hypocrisy is?
LOL. Looks like they want to "conserve" stupidity, along with their egocentrism.

No, we are just interested in stopping you fascist fuck baby killers.....

You sound like an anti-freedom fascist.
And you don't even realize it!
LOL. How stupid.

You are an anti-freedom fascist....so.....

 

[2aguy]

Late term abortions are rarely done and they are generally done for the health of the mother or if is the baby severely deformed and wouldn't live a second outside the womb.
Secondly, you concsrvatives hypocrites. In one breath you are a full supporter of a fetus and it's rights. But soon as that fetus is born, you don't give a shit about it. You don't want it to have free healthcare or free higher education so they can live a full life. You want welfare programs cut. You complain about welfare queens having 8 kids but you don't support forcing free birth control pills and don't want people getting abortions. So you are going to have the number of welfare queens double.
If you are going to support a fetus's rights then you need to support it from conception until death. Not from conception until birth.

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

 

[owebo]

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

You too have no idea what "conservative" hypocrisy is. LOL.

You have no idea what conservative is.....

So tell me ...

It's nothing a fascist baby killer could ever comprehend......

 

[2aguy]

Late term abortions are rarely done and they are generally done for the health of the mother or if is the baby severely deformed and wouldn't live a second outside the womb.
Secondly, you concsrvatives hypocrites. In one breath you are a full supporter of a fetus and it's rights. But soon as that fetus is born, you don't give a shit about it. You don't want it to have free healthcare or free higher education so they can live a full life. You want welfare programs cut. You complain about welfare queens having 8 kids but you don't support forcing free birth control pills and don't want people getting abortions. So you are going to have the number of welfare queens double.
If you are going to support a fetus's rights then you need to support it from conception until death. Not from conception until birth.

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

So then stop telling women what to do with their reproductive rights.

We don't care about her reproductive rights.....she can have all the sex she wants...she just can't murder the baby because she doesn't want the hastle of giving the baby up for adoption..or dropping the baby off at a local fire department....moron.

 

[Nia88]

Late term abortions are rarely done and they are generally done for the health of the mother or if is the baby severely deformed and wouldn't live a second outside the womb.
Secondly, you concsrvatives hypocrites. In one breath you are a full supporter of a fetus and it's rights. But soon as that fetus is born, you don't give a shit about it. You don't want it to have free healthcare or free higher education so they can live a full life. You want welfare programs cut. You complain about welfare queens having 8 kids but you don't support forcing free birth control pills and don't want people getting abortions. So you are going to have the number of welfare queens double.
If you are going to support a fetus's rights then you need to support it from conception until death. Not from conception until birth.

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

Forcing a woman to have a baby she doesn't want and that child growing up with a mother who resents him/her is cruel. Better she have an abortion and not put a child through that.

 

[2aguy]

Late term abortions are rarely done and they are generally done for the health of the mother or if is the baby severely deformed and wouldn't live a second outside the womb.
Secondly, you concsrvatives hypocrites. In one breath you are a full supporter of a fetus and it's rights. But soon as that fetus is born, you don't give a shit about it. You don't want it to have free healthcare or free higher education so they can live a full life. You want welfare programs cut. You complain about welfare queens having 8 kids but you don't support forcing free birth control pills and don't want people getting abortions. So you are going to have the number of welfare queens double.
If you are going to support a fetus's rights then you need to support it from conception until death. Not from conception until birth.

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

6 weeks and the heart is beating asswipe.......if left alone the baby will grow into a full size human......unless you murder them...

 

[Nia88]

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

So then stop telling women what to do with their reproductive rights.

We don't care about her reproductive rights.....she can have all the sex she wants...she just can't murder the baby because she doesn't want the hastle of giving the baby up for adoption..or dropping the baby off at a local fire department....moron.

Ok so say she gives it up for adoption. That baby is going to have a crappy life growing up in a group home. Because adoption is really difficult which is why most couples don't do it. And under Furher Trump, he'll probably cut funding for group homes. So you rather have that child grow up in a crappy environment with no parent or love?

 

[PK1]

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

6 weeks and the heart is beating asswipe.......if left alone the baby will grow into a full size human......unless you murder them...

Hey "asswipe", i care more about my born dog & cat with "beating heart" than YOUR 6 week from conception "baby" aka embryo.

If you really cared about this issue, where is your support for all those millions suffering born babies in this world? Don't you care about them in Africa or Asia?
Asswipe hypocrisy LOL!

 

[owebo]

Late term abortions are rarely done and they are generally done for the health of the mother or if is the baby severely deformed and wouldn't live a second outside the womb.
Secondly, you concsrvatives hypocrites. In one breath you are a full supporter of a fetus and it's rights. But soon as that fetus is born, you don't give a shit about it. You don't want it to have free healthcare or free higher education so they can live a full life. You want welfare programs cut. You complain about welfare queens having 8 kids but you don't support forcing free birth control pills and don't want people getting abortions. So you are going to have the number of welfare queens double.
If you are going to support a fetus's rights then you need to support it from conception until death. Not from conception until birth.

We are against murder of babies.

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

Forcing a woman to have a baby she doesn't want and that child growing up with a mother who resents him/her is cruel. Better she have an abortion and not put a child through that.

So, you're saying you one of these fetuses now?

Killing a baby is pure evil.....

 

[owebo]

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

So then stop telling women what to do with their reproductive rights.

We don't care about her reproductive rights.....she can have all the sex she wants...she just can't murder the baby because she doesn't want the hastle of giving the baby up for adoption..or dropping the baby off at a local fire department....moron.

Ok so say she gives it up for adoption. That baby is going to have a crappy life growing up in a group home. Because adoption is really difficult which is why most couples don't do it. And under Furher Trump, he'll probably cut funding for group homes. So you rather have that child grow up in a crappy environment with no parent or love?

You can tell this from your crystal ball? Can I have the winning lottery numbers....

 

[2aguy]

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

6 weeks and the heart is beating asswipe.......if left alone the baby will grow into a full size human......unless you murder them...

Hey "asswipe", i care more about my born dog & cat with "beating heart" than YOUR 6 week from conception "baby" aka embryo.

If you really cared about this issue, where is your support for all those millions suffering born babies in this world? Don't you care about them in Africa or Asia?
Asswipe hypocrisy LOL!

Yes.....push the lie that conservatives don't care about children after they are born...that gives you comfort to continue pushing to allow babies to be murdered....it is a flimsy cloth to hide behind moron....because it isn't true, you know it isn't true and you know that murdering a baby is exactly that...murdering a baby....

 

[2aguy]

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

We just want your fascist .gov to stay out of people's lives....

So then stop telling women what to do with their reproductive rights.

We don't care about her reproductive rights.....she can have all the sex she wants...she just can't murder the baby because she doesn't want the hastle of giving the baby up for adoption..or dropping the baby off at a local fire department....moron.

Ok so say she gives it up for adoption. That baby is going to have a crappy life growing up in a group home. Because adoption is really difficult which is why most couples don't do it. And under Furher Trump, he'll probably cut funding for group homes. So you rather have that child grow up in a crappy environment with no parent or love?

Since you assholes run the agencies it is no wonder they suck.......actual adoption puts children into real homes with actual parents......and because you morons put up so many blocks to Americans adopting children, that is why you see so many asian kids in white families....you assholes get out of the way, and make it easier to adopt here, and then you will show you actually care about children.....

 

[Nia88]

More hypocrisy from the keep-gov-out "conservatives".
Trying to sensationalize your religious agenda, i see.

Murder of a fetus? LOL.
Someone else 's "baby"

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

6 weeks and the heart is beating asswipe.......if left alone the baby will grow into a full size human......unless you murder them...

Hey "asswipe", i care more about my born dog & cat with "beating heart" than YOUR 6 week from conception "baby" aka embryo.

If you really cared about this issue, where is your support for all those millions suffering born babies in this world? Don't you care about them in Africa or Asia?
Asswipe hypocrisy LOL!

Unlike you Ive actually been to Africa and have done volunteer work. Ive been to Morocco, Kenya, South Africa and Nigeria. But part of stopping children's suffering is providing birth control pills and IUDs and access to safe and clean abortions for women.

 

[easyt65]

Obama’s opposed Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
(-- This is verified by FactCheck.org, even though they disagree with this beig called 'supporting 'infantcide': Obama and 'Infanticide' - FactCheck.org)

THAT means President Obama opposed a baby, outside the womb fighting for life after a failed attempted abortion, being recognized as a 'baby' and being given legal protection as a human being rather than retain the 'status' of being nothing more than a 'lump of cells'.

Further explaining, THAT means President Obama fought for the right to murder babies outside the womb who have survived failed abortions.

This surpasses even the latest acceptable 'Late term Abortion' procedures - we are talking about killing a living, breathing human being outside the womb.

It's bad enough that anyone would support shoving a metal rod inside of the skull of a baby capable of surviving outside the womb, scrambling its brains, cutting it into pieces, and dragging the parts out of the mother - unless the mother's life was in danger...but to be a proponent of murdering a living, breathing human being outside the womb is altogether so much more horrible.
-- It is appalling that we like to consider ourselves such an advances, sophisticated culture yet would engage in such barbaric acts still today.

Abortions are not a form of post-intercourse contraceptive.

Abortions are not meant to be an 'easy way to escape the consequences of one's actions.

If one wants to ensure pregnancy does not occur they can immediately take the 'morning after' pill instead of waiting until a baby begins developing and killing it.

The vast majority of abortions are 'Elective Surgery' that should be paid for by the individual wanting the surgery.

At a certain point during the pregnancy a baby - a living human being - is created, one that can actually survive outside the womb. At that point no abortions should be allowed (IMO) unless of emergency, such as the life of the mother being in danger.

 

[owebo]

They want the government out of their lives except when it comes to controlling women and minorities. Then in that case it's the government's duty.

What part of stopping murder fits into your "conservatives don't want government in our lives" stupidity? Do you guys pretend to be this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Aborting fetus that doesn't even have a brain or lungs isn't murder. Most abortions are done early in the pregnancy before the fetus has developed any organs or limbs.

6 weeks and the heart is beating asswipe.......if left alone the baby will grow into a full size human......unless you murder them...

Hey "asswipe", i care more about my born dog & cat with "beating heart" than YOUR 6 week from conception "baby" aka embryo.

If you really cared about this issue, where is your support for all those millions suffering born babies in this world? Don't you care about them in Africa or Asia?
Asswipe hypocrisy LOL!

Unlike you Ive actually been to Africa and have done volunteer work. But part of stopping children's suffering is providing birth control pills and IUDs and access to safe and clean abortions for women.

You fascist baby killers have infected large parts of the world.....

We will deal with you here first....then spread,the word....

 

[2aguy]

You morons push the fantasy that people who want to save the live of the baby even at it's earliest moments of existence are all of a sudden going to not care about the same baby after they are born....while you asswipes will allow a fully grown baby to have it's spinal cord cut and the baby murdered and then claim to care about actual children who pass through your gauntlet of death.....

you guys are really fucking stupid...

 

[RealCalConservative]

Obama’s opposed Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
(-- This is verified by FactCheck.org, even though they disagree with this beig called 'supporting 'infantcide': Obama and 'Infanticide' - FactCheck.org)

THAT means President Obama opposed a baby, outside the womb fighting for life after a failed attempted abortion, being recognized as a 'baby' and being given legal protection as a human being rather than retain the 'status' of being nothing more than a 'lump of cells'.

Further explaining, THAT means President Obama fought for the right to murder babies outside the womb who have survived failed abortions.

This surpasses even the latest acceptable 'Late term Abortion' procedures - we are talking about killing a living, breathing human being outside the womb.

It's bad enough that anyone would support shoving a metal rod inside of the skull of a baby capable of surviving outside the womb, scrambling its brains, cutting it into pieces, and dragging the parts out of the mother - unless the mother's life was in danger...but to be a proponent of murdering a living, breathing human being outside the womb is altogether so much more horrible.
-- It is appalling that we like to consider ourselves such an advances, sophisticated culture yet would engage in such barbaric acts still today.

Abortions are not a form of post-intercourse contraceptive.

Abortions are not meant to be an 'easy way to escape the consequences of one's actions.

If one wants to ensure pregnancy does not occur they can immediately take the 'morning after' pill instead of waiting until a baby begins developing and killing it.

The vast majority of abortions are 'Elective Surgery' that should be paid for by the individual wanting the surgery.

At a certain point during the pregnancy a baby - a living human being - is created, one that can actually survive outside the womb. At that point no abortions should be allowed (IMO) unless of emergency, such as the life of the mother being in danger.

In my humble opinion, once you have a positive pregnancy test and some form of evidence that the pregnancy is not going to harm the mother such as an ectopic pregnancy or an existing chronic maternal/fetal health condition, then the baby should receive some sort of protection, and butchering the baby should not be allowed.

It's not a civil rights issue.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[owebo]

Obama’s opposed Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
(-- This is verified by FactCheck.org, even though they disagree with this beig called 'supporting 'infantcide': Obama and 'Infanticide' - FactCheck.org)

THAT means President Obama opposed a baby, outside the womb fighting for life after a failed attempted abortion, being recognized as a 'baby' and being given legal protection as a human being rather than retain the 'status' of being nothing more than a 'lump of cells'.

Further explaining, THAT means President Obama fought for the right to murder babies outside the womb who have survived failed abortions.

This surpasses even the latest acceptable 'Late term Abortion' procedures - we are talking about killing a living, breathing human being outside the womb.

It's bad enough that anyone would support shoving a metal rod inside of the skull of a baby capable of surviving outside the womb, scrambling its brains, cutting it into pieces, and dragging the parts out of the mother - unless the mother's life was in danger...but to be a proponent of murdering a living, breathing human being outside the womb is altogether so much more horrible.
-- It is appalling that we like to consider ourselves such an advances, sophisticated culture yet would engage in such barbaric acts still today.

Abortions are not a form of post-intercourse contraceptive.

Abortions are not meant to be an 'easy way to escape the consequences of one's actions.

If one wants to ensure pregnancy does not occur they can immediately take the 'morning after' pill instead of waiting until a baby begins developing and killing it.

The vast majority of abortions are 'Elective Surgery' that should be paid for by the individual wanting the surgery.

At a certain point during the pregnancy a baby - a living human being - is created, one that can actually survive outside the womb. At that point no abortions should be allowed (IMO) unless of emergency, such as the life of the mother being in danger.

In my humble opinion, once you have a positive pregnancy test and some form of evidence that the pregnancy is not going to harm the mother such as an ectopic pregnancy or an existing chronic maternal/fetal health condition, then the baby should receive some sort of protection, and butchering the baby should not be allowed.

It's not a civil rights issue.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I disagree, it is a civil rights issue...the civil right of th baby....

I am fine with abortion as a medical procedure, decided upon only by a practicing Doctor as a necessary life and death death decision....

Abortion as we know of will be over soon...