"Liberals" strike again. Two blatant & direct Constitutional violations

TheDude

Gold Member
Oct 26, 2016
5,915
1,031
290
U.S.A. gone wild
Let's see:

1st Amendment free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

1st Amendment free petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

2nd Amendment? Course not.

14th Amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.

12th Amendment? Not if it elects Trump.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral
 
Last edited:
Let's see:

Free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

Freedom to Petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

Second amendment? Course not.

14th amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral

Molon Labe'..........translation: Come and take it.....and bring body bags.
 
Let's see:

Free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

Freedom to Petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

Second amendment? Course not.

14th amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral

Molon Labe'..........translation: Come and take it.....and bring body bags.
And no one ever does or has, odd huh.
 
Let's see:

Free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

Freedom to Petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

Second amendment? Course not.

14th amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral

Molon Labe'..........translation: Come and take it.....and bring body bags.
And no one ever does or has, odd huh.


My friend (and I consider you as one because you are "awake") that time is coming where people will have to make a stand.......you can take that to the bank and etch it in stone.
 
Let's see:

Free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

Freedom to Petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

Second amendment? Course not.

14th amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral

Molon Labe'..........translation: Come and take it.....and bring body bags.
And no one ever does or has, odd huh.


My friend (and I consider you as one because you are "awake") that time is coming where people will have to make a stand.......you can take that to the bank and etch it in stone.
But they won't, watch. Guns ain't the issue, the economic system is, they don't need your guns anymore.
 
Let's see:

1st Amendment free speech? Nope, it only applies if you're under indoctrination.

1st Amendment free petition? For many, that means freedom to destroy. And if you're say a Trump supporter, you're to be disrupted and even assaulted.

2nd Amendment? Course not.

14th Amendment? Not if it interferes with the liberal doctrine.

12th Amendment? Not if it elects Trump.


No doubt I'm missing a few.

Oregon Governor Just Signed A GUN CONFISCATION Law – This Needs to Go Viral

You're leaving out a bit, and so is the link you're using. According to Snopes, this is only partially true..................

The article accurately describes some components and implications of the law, but also greatly exaggerates its provisions, uses unspecific and misleading language, and also leaves out important facts and context about the legislation.

Oregon Senate Bill 719 is intended to introduce a judicial process whereby concerned individuals can ask a judge to quickly sign an order allowing for the confiscation of firearms from a particular individual deemed to present a risk of suicide, self-harm, or violence to others. It was signed into law by Governor Kate Brown on 23 August 2017, and will come into force on 1 January 2018.

The bill authorizes law enforcement agents to confiscate guns from individuals deemed to be a danger to themselves or others, under specific, limited circumstances, in what is called an “extreme risk protection order.” It can only be requested by law enforcement officials, family members and housemates, thus largely minimizing the risk of vexatious or malicious requests. (This limitation is not mentioned by Silence is Consent.) The order can only be granted by a judge, but must be either granted or denied within 24 hours of the request.

Further, it is somewhat misleading to claim, as this article does, that guns can be confiscated “simply based off of hearsay evidence” or that “no actual evidence” is required. The bill stipulates that in reaching their decision, a judge will consider the following kinds of evidence:

  • A written affidavit or oral statement made under oath by the person making the request
  • A history of suicide attempts or threats, or violence against others
  • A history of attempted, threatened, or actual use of physical force against others
  • Any previous convictions for: misdemeanor violence, stalking, domestic violence, driving under the influence, animal cruelty
  • Evidence of recent illicit drug abuse
  • Previous reckless or illegal use, brandishing or display of a deadly weapon
  • Evidence of having acquired or attempted to acquire a deadly weapon within the past six months
If the request is successful, the judge issues the order, which applies for one year. The subject of the order has 24 hours to hand in any firearms or gun license they may possess, either to a law enforcement agent or licensed gun dealer. Law enforcement officials are also authorized to confiscate such firearms. For the next twelve months, the subject of the order cannot legally buy, possess, or attempt to buy or possess any firearm. They have 30 days in which to apply for a hearing to overturn the order, and such a hearing must take place within 21 days of their request.

If they don’t succeed in overturning the order, the order remains in place. If they do succeed, the order is lifted, and any property handed over or taken from them is returned to them, providing they are otherwise legally authorized to possess that property. The order is not automatically renewed after a year, but whomever requested it in the first place can request a renewal. The same process applies to the renewal request as it did to the original request.


FACT CHECK: Did Oregon's Governor Sign a 'Gun Confiscation' Law?

Here's another that says basically the same thing......................

Oregon lawmakers have approved a bill that aims to prevent suicides and shootings by taking firearms away from people deemed at risk.

Senate Bill 719 allows a law-enforcement officer, or a person’s family or household member, to petition the court for a one-year extreme risk protection order that would prohibit the respondent from possessing a deadly weapon.

If a judge finds clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is in imminent danger of hurting themselves or another person, the respondent would have 24 hours to surrender all deadly weapons.

“Nationwide, 60 percent of gun deaths are suicides,” Rep. Jennifer Williamson, D-Portland, said. “It is my hope today this bill will help address that crisis.”


Oregon Legislature passes bill to take guns from suicidal people
 

Forum List

Back
Top