President asserts executive privilege ?

[BackAgain]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

And if the special counsel was actually performing his task independently of the DOJ (as the appointment pretends such appointments are), then the executive branch ought to not have any say over compliance with a Legislative branch subpoena for them.

 

[OldFlame]

Hail King Bidumb!

 

[Lesh]

They have the entire transcripts

 

[BackAgain]

They have the entire transcripts

Maybe. But not the point.

You’re often pointless, Letch.

 

[Billiejeens]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

And if the special counsel was actually performing his task independently of the DOJ (as the appointment pretends such appointments are), then the executive branch ought to not have any say over compliance with a Legislative branch subpoena for them.

There is just nothing that this administration won't do.

And the Cultists that luv it - sickening.

 

[Billiejeens]

Maybe. But not the point.

You’re often pointless, Letch.

1 post - 2 facts

 

[BackAgain]

Now I really want to hear the tapes.

 

[Independent thinker]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

And if the special counsel was actually performing his task independently of the DOJ (as the appointment pretends such appointments are), then the executive branch ought to not have any say over compliance with a Legislative branch subpoena for them.

This from the "transparent" Biden administration.

 

[Billiejeens]

This from the "transparent" Biden administration.

Words don't mean what they are supposed to mean when proffered by Democrats.

 

[struth]

They have the entire transcripts

We don’t know that. Why is xiden stonewalling? What is he hiding???

 

[CrusaderFrank]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

And if the special counsel was actually performing his task independently of the DOJ (as the appointment pretends such appointments are), then the executive branch ought to not have any say over compliance with a Legislative branch subpoena for them.

It's as if we're occupied by Fascist Progressives

 

[Billiejeens]

It's as if we're occupied by Fascist Progressives

We have been an occupied nation for a bit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

And if the special counsel was actually performing his task independently of the DOJ (as the appointment pretends such appointments are), then the executive branch ought to not have any say over compliance with a Legislative branch subpoena for them.

It's bad for national security if our enemies see that Joe is a drooling moron.

 

[BackAgain]

It's bad for national security if our enemies see that Joe is a drooling moron.

I think they’ve already noticed.

 

[BlindBoo]

How come Benedict Donald wasn't forced to turn over audio tapes of his voluntary interview by the Special Counsel investigating his handling of Documents?

"In his letter, Siskel noted disclosure of materials like the audio would make it less likely that witnesses in future high-profile investigations will voluntarily cooperate. And, he noted: "The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal—to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes. Demanding such sensitive and constitutionally-protected law enforcement materials from the Executive Branch because you want to manipulate them for potential political gain is inappropriate."

"Siskel added: "Rather than demonstrating respect for the rule of law, this contempt proceeding is just the latest in the Committees' damaging efforts to undermine the very independence and impartiality of the Department of Justice and criminal justice system that President Biden seeks to protect."

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/16/1251759154/garland-house-contempt

 

[BackAgain]

How come Benedict Donald wasn't forced to turn over audio tapes of his voluntary interview by the Special Counsel investigating his handling of Documents?

"In his letter, Siskel noted disclosure of materials like the audio would make it less likely that witnesses in future high-profile investigations will voluntarily cooperate. And, he noted: "The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal—to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes. Demanding such sensitive and constitutionally-protected law enforcement materials from the Executive Branch because you want to manipulate them for potential political gain is inappropriate."

"Siskel added: "Rather than demonstrating respect for the rule of law, this contempt proceeding is just the latest in the Committees' damaging efforts to undermine the very independence and impartiality of the Department of Justice and criminal justice system that President Biden seeks to protect."

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/16/1251759154/garland-house-contempt

As usual you conflate things. Siskle’s reply wasn’t lawyering; it was just partisan posturing.

And your what about-ism also fails.

Is there or is there not, IN THIS MATTER, any valid claim of Executive Privilege?

If the appointment of any special prosecutor is Constitutionally and legally valid and such appointment makes the special counsel truly independent, then the subject of that investigation shouldn’t get any say about compliance with a Congressional subpoena.

Of course, if such appointment isn’t Constitutionally and legally valid, then the Smith prosecutions of President Trump should be summarily dismissed.

 

[Lesh]

We don’t know that. Why is xiden stonewalling? What is he hiding???

“You” don’t know much of anything

 

[postman]

White House says Hur tapes are privileged as Congress moves to hold Garland in contempt — The Washington Post

President Biden has asserted executive privilege over audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified materials.

apple.news

Why?

But made determinations about Biden not based only on what he said but on how he spoke. How is that a subject of privilege?

Let me remind you, even the president poop, is subject to executive privilege.

Excrement In the News

Excrement In the News

www.huffpost.com

The Bush White House is so concerned about Bush's security, the veil of secrecy extends over the president's bodily excretions. The special port-a-john captured Bush's feces and urine and flew the waste material back to the United States in the event some enterprising foreign intelligence agency conducted a sewage pipe operation designed to trap and examine Bush's waste material.

 

[BackAgain]

Let me remind you, even the president poop, is subject to executive privilege.

Excrement In the News

Excrement In the News

www.huffpost.com

The Bush White House is so concerned about Bush's security, the veil of secrecy extends over the president's bodily excretions. The special port-a-john captured Bush's feces and urine and flew the waste material back to the United States in the event some enterprising foreign intelligence agency conducted a sewage pipe operation designed to trap and examine Bush's waste material.

That’s not executive privilege. It’s just security.

 

[postman]

Is there or is there not, IN THIS MATTER, any valid claim of Executive Privilege?

Let me remind you, even the president's poop, is subject to executive privilege.

Excrement In the News

Excrement In the News

www.huffpost.com

The Bush White House is so concerned about Bush's security, the veil of secrecy extends over the president's bodily excretions. The special port-a-john captured Bush's feces and urine and flew the waste material back to the United States in the event some enterprising foreign intelligence agency conducted a sewage pipe operation designed to trap and examine Bush's waste material.