Liberals panic as they lose the gun narrative

Article II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


there are two rights in the Article: "A well regulated Militia" (military weapons) .... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" ("Arms" - personal for hunting self protection) - Arms is distinguished from military weapons.
 
Libs have been unable to articulate any coherent argument opposing putting cops in schools...

How does that help the two firemen?

Some eagles are just born stupid.
That piece of shit murdered his grandmother - he should of been put to death long ago. Liberals couldn't wait to release his ass - now you want to blame guns - your a retard!
Liberals relish these tragedies to attack our constitutionally afforded rights while they protect the slaughtering of the unborne :puke:

More interesting is how he killed granny...he used a hammer. Now explain to me again how taking my legally acquired and owned firearms would have prevented that? Determined crazies do not need guns.

N.Y. man who shot dead 2 firefighters killed grandmother in 1980 - CNN.com
 
And pray tell who is going to pay for these services? Hell, most towns can't even pass a school levy.

They'll fire a teacher or two to pay for each of the guards. It will take the salaries of two teachers to pay for one cop because the police won't work for the crap wages they pay teachers.

False:

Staring Police Officer pay in Tampa is about $46K

Starting teacher pay in Tampa is about $37K

The Sergeant at our high school makes $45K and was happy to take the pay cut. His job is 8-4 with no nights and weekends.
 
In the Lefts insane world, they want to ban guns, because guns cause 12,664 murders a year.
Yet they support abortions that cause 1 million 212,400 murders of little boys and girls a year.

maybe that's why they don't want to protect our schools.......they support infanticide too.....

:eusa_shifty:
 
And pray tell who is going to pay for these services? Hell, most towns can't even pass a school levy.

They'll fire a teacher or two to pay for each of the guards. It will take the salaries of two teachers to pay for one cop because the police won't work for the crap wages they pay teachers.

The average salary in the US for a teacher is $45,000 and the average for a police officer is just about $50,000. Police officers work 12 months a year.
 
Article II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


there are two rights in the Article: "A well regulated Militia" (military weapons) .... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" ("Arms" - personal for hunting self protection) - Arms is distinguished from military weapons.

Who do you think makes up "a well-regulated militia"? Said militia was intended to be self-supporting, not government-funded.
 
How does that help the two firemen?

Some eagles are just born stupid.


The shooter was a convicted murderer.

It was ALREADY ILLEGAL for him to own a firearm.

Did that stop him?

As an aside, I am so thankful for your adherence to the "truth in labeling" standard by including "nut" right in your handle.

and the answer it too add more guns eh? more oppertunity to allow as you put it already illegal guns into peoples hands?

It's an effective answer. You don't often hear about crazy people going into gun shops and killing a bunch of people, do you? No they go to where they are reasonably confident they will meet little or no armed opposition.
 
if you are not in the Airforce you should not own a plane - guns are like airplanes.

someone should have told the lady in Connecticut the same thing - or at least to have a shotgun at home and forget the other shit.

no one needs an assault rifle for self protection - the gun lobby has no argument to win but just self serving rhetoric.

The 2nd amendment doesn't mention a thing about self protection. That's not really the reason it exists. Keeping the government humble and subservient is the reason it exists.
 
Article II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


there are two rights in the Article: "A well regulated Militia" (military weapons) .... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" ("Arms" - personal for hunting self protection) - Arms is distinguished from military weapons.

"two rights"......? you're starting to sound like the ACLU....

II. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

"well regulated militia" does not mean the National Guard....or some other form of GOVERNMENT-run military operation....

at the time the Constitution was written "well regulated" meant "well trained"....and it doesn't say that the government is responsible to train them...

and as far as "militia" goes.....

If you read 10 USC Sec. 311 (That's Title 10 of the U.S. Code, Section 311, subtitle A part chapter 13) you'll find this:

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

In other words, if you have a penis, you ARE the militia!

The Importance of the Second Amendment
 
Libs have been unable to articulate any coherent argument opposing putting cops in schools...

How does that help the two firemen?

Some eagles are just born stupid.

Senator Feinstein's conceal and carry permit will give her peace of mind. Why does should she get to have that while law abiding citizens are denied? When she and other politicians and Hollywood elite calling for a ban on guns give up their firearms and firearms by proxy, then it is an option that can be taken seriously except an option that is currently full of shit.
 
Article II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


there are two rights in the Article: "A well regulated Militia" (military weapons) .... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" ("Arms" - personal for hunting self protection) - Arms is distinguished from military weapons.

The courts disagree. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to be protected by the second a weapon must be in common use amongst the military. And they further ruled one need not be a member of an organized militia to have a personal right to keep and bear arms. Do keep up.
 
Libs have been unable to articulate any coherent argument opposing putting cops in schools...

(note how Obama has 'stepped away' from the debate by assigning a "blue ribbon commission")

Their credibility and motives already in question, the gun banners became vulnerable to a shift in the paradigm from depriving law-abiding citizens of effective defensive weapons to the idea of protecting kids with armed personnel in schools.

Suddenly, the gun banners had to argue two ridiculous positions. The first was that allowing trained educators or police having weapons in schools is a danger. The problem is that people generally like and trust teachers and cops. The second position was even worse, that armed personnel or police are somehow utterly useless against untrained, amateur creeps who seek to confront six-year olds. All over America, millions of parents noted how none of the wealthy gun banners were disbanding their personal security teams and thought, “You know, I think I’d like having a cop around my kid too.”

Liberals Panic As They Lose the Gun Narrative - Kurt Schlichter - [page]
Theyre not liberals, Theyre control Freaks. Nothing liberal about them but the stupidity they display here quite liberally.
 
some nuts are just mentally ill...

That doesn't answer my question.

Trolling your own thread? You're dumber than I thought.

Answer the question, nitwit?

Only liberals think every conceivable problem has a solution. Thousands of people slip in the tub and get killed every year. How do you help them?

Yep. Every problem known to mankind needs a gubmint approved liberal solution!!

Got a painful boil on your ass? No problem!! Just call Obama's "Dept of Ass Boil Removal" and a gubmint approved "ass boil removal specialist" will take care of your problem!!! (for FREEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!)

Gubmint!! It's always the answer!!!

:clap2:
 
if you are not in the Airforce you should not own a plane - guns are like airplanes.

someone should have told the lady in Connecticut the same thing - or at least to have a shotgun at home and forget the other shit.

no one needs an assault rifle for self protection - the gun lobby has no argument to win but just self serving rhetoric.

Two things,an Ar15 isn't an assault rifle,second what do you think gives you the right telling me what I can and can't have about my security??

Three guys show up at your house armed ready for a home invasion,1 guy is at the back door one at the front and one coming threw the side door,you think that single shot 20ga you got from your pops would be the optimum gun to have??

You don't get to make those choices for people and should NEVER be able to.
 
if you are not in the Airforce you should not own a plane - guns are like airplanes.

someone should have told the lady in Connecticut the same thing - or at least to have a shotgun at home and forget the other shit.

no one needs an assault rifle for self protection - the gun lobby has no argument to win but just self serving rhetoric.

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting or personal defense. It has to do with the People of America maintaining a military force for the sole purpose of overthrowing a government that becomes too tyrannical. That is the 100% documented, non-debatable intent of the Second Amendment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top