Liberals favor population control by having a war on women and blacks!

[Edgetho]

i guess the abortion part of this could also reduce the number of liberals who will grow up to be more stupid than their sperm and egg donators

I guess we can take that as a good thing, but it will already be to late as they will have destroyed us by then...

It's the age old "Nature v. Nurture" question.

libturds aren't born, they're made.

By dimocrap scum.

 

[healthmyths]

So America can be a better place if low income Americans would just have more children?

lol, classic wingnuttery.

OK I'll go real slow for you...
America would be a better place if low income Americans were better educated about the risks of pregnancies.. and not given abortions on demand!
Obviously you are totally ignorant as to the fact that 47% of abortions are done by women that have already had one or more abortions!

Stupid... why are we encouraging abortions which endanger these womens' lives! Why are we encouraging risky life style behavior by rewarding it?

The secondary fallout of all this is exemplified by YOU!
Lower and lower informed Americans allowing idiots to be elected because their idiot followers like YOU think the government is the answer! You and your fellow idiots think ah have an abortion! Rather then thinking of all the consequences both personally (mentally,physically) and societal!
With people so cavalier about life that "ah... she's pregnant.. not my problem" is the norm the American population is doomed!

The first line of your OP is this:

"The purpose of Planned Parenthood the major abortion factory and funded by our tax dollars is to reduce the population."

That means you oppose birth control of any kind because you want people to have more babies.

WHY?

I have NO problem with abortions in the case of rape,incest or mother's health.
What I do have is a what most people should have is a concern for those women who KNOW the risks of abortion but continue to have one or more abortions.
47% of the abortions are by women who've had one or more and of that 8% have had 3 or more!
So this process of abortion on demand must be for the sake of the health of the women be reduced.
47% of women are putting their lives at risk by having abortions.

So I find it totally hypocritical for liberals to accuse Conservatives of a "War on Women".. in light of the cavalier attitude regardless of a woman's health risks especially those
47% that already have had abortions! There is certainly a failure on the part of the "elitists" that want to protect us from womb to tomb in not being concerned about
the below health risks to women having abortions...especially when 47% of these women have had one or more abortions before!

It just seems very obvious that blaming the conservatives for a War on Women when these same liberals are ok with 47% of women who've had one or more abortions
are putting their health at risk..i.e. a war on women!

In her testimony before a Senate subcommittee in 2004, Dr. Elizabeth Shadigan testified that “abortion increases rates of breast cancer, placenta previa, pre-term births, and maternal suicide.... Statistically, all types of deaths are higher with women who have had induced abortions.”
At least forty-nine studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births or low birth weight risk in women with prior induced abortions. “Low birth weight and premature birth are the most important risk factors for infant mortality or later disabilities as well as for lower cognitive abilities and greater behavioral problems.”*

Malformations of later children are increased by abortion.* The frequency of early death for infants born after their mothers have had abortions is between two and four times the normal rate.* Induced abortion appears to be responsible for thousands of cases of cerebral palsy in North America.*

Ectopic pregnancies occur when gestation takes place outside the uterus, commonly in a fallopian tube. Such pregnancies are responsible for 12 percent of all pregnancy-related maternal deaths.* The US Department of Health and Human Services conducted a twenty-year study on ectopic pregnancy rates, which indicated an increase in ectopic pregnancies of more than 500 percent since abortion was legalized.*

Studies show that the risk of an ectopic pregnancy is twice as high for women who have had one abortion, and up to four times as high for women with two or more previous abortions.* Of those who have an ectopic pregnancy, 40 percent become infertile, and the odds of having another ectopic pregnancy are one in three. Remarkably, “only 33% of women with ectopic pregnancy will have a subsequent live birth.”*

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports, “pregnancy related complications, such as ectopic pregnancy…still affect 2,000 women each day.”

Does abortion harm a woman's physical and mental health? - Resources - Eternal Perspective Ministries

 

[hangover]

Liberals favor population control by having a war on women and blacks!

Yeah, that's why the "majority" of liberals are women and blacks. Try again moron.

 

[Edgetho]

Liberals favor population control by having a war on women and blacks!

Yeah, that's why the "majority" of liberals are women and blacks. Try again moron.

Married women identify as Republican by a 15% margin.

Blacks? They're so ******* dependent on gubmint, it's disgusting. Who cares what they think.... They just want their 30 pieces of silver

Try again douche-nozzle

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Could you be any more wrong?

Fewer people=fewer services required=lower taxes.

Why do you suppose taxes are higher in urban areas as opposed to rural?

Unions and the politicians in their pockets.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The purpose of Planned Parenthood the major abortion factory and funded by our tax dollars is to reduce the population.

If you can't afford to have children then you shouldn't be having them. The ones that do and can't afford it end up leeching off the welfare state. Surely, you aren't arguing for more welfare spending, are you?

 

[Edgetho]

My earlier post with the Simply Red song in it was a reflection on the state of man/woman relationships in this Country.

Here's another comment on it from a bygone, better era:

Here from Heritage, is a letter he wrote to his son Michael in 1971. In the letter, Reagan summarized in a few short paragraphs how much happiness marriage could bring people, and challenged his son to use his advice to seek out the same happiness he had found with his wife, Nancy.

It is, perhaps, great advice for us all.

Dear Mike:

Enclosed is the item I mentioned (with which goes a torn up IOU). I could stop here but I won’t.

You’ve heard all the jokes that have been rousted around by all the “unhappy marrieds” and cynics. Now, in case no one has suggested it, there is another viewpoint. You have entered into the most meaningful relationship there is in all human life. It can be whatever you decide to make it. Some men feel their masculinity can only be proven if they play out in their own life all the locker-room stories, smugly confident that what a wife doesn’t know won’t hurt her. The truth is, somehow, way down inside, without her ever finding lipstick on the collar or catching a man in the flimsy excuse of where he was till three A.M., a wife does know, and with that knowing, some of the magic of this relationship disappears. There are more men griping about marriage who kicked the whole thing away themselves than there can ever be wives deserving of blame. There is an old law of physics that you can only get out of a thing as much as you put in it. The man who puts into the marriage only half of what he owns will get that out.

Sure, there will be moments when you will see someone or think back to an earlier time and you will be challenged to see if you can still make the grade, but let me tell you how really great is the challenge of proving your masculinity and charm with one woman for the rest of your life. Any man can find a twerp here and there who will go along with cheating, and it doesn’t take all that much manhood. It does take quite a man to remain attractive and to be loved by a woman who has heard him snore, seen him unshaven, tended him while he was sick and washed his dirty underwear. Do that and keep her still feeling a warm glow and you will know some very beautiful music. If you truly love a girl, you shouldn’t ever want her to feel, when she sees you greet a secretary or a girl you both know, that humiliation of wondering if she was someone who caused you to be late coming home, nor should you want any other woman to be able to meet your wife and know she was smiling behind her eyes as she looked at her, the woman you love, remembering this was the woman you rejected even momentarily for her favors.
Mike, you know better than many what an unhappy home is and what it can do to others. Now you have a chance to make it come out the way it should. There is no greater happiness for a man than approaching a door at the end of a day knowing someone on the other side of that door is waiting for the sound of his footsteps.

Love,
Dad
P.S. You’ll never get in trouble if you say “I love you” at least once a day.

 

[Vandalshandle]

it's probably a good thing that Ron didn't write that letter before Jane Wyman left him....

 

[Clementine]

The purpose of Planned Parenthood the major abortion factory and funded by our tax dollars is to reduce the population.
Reducing the population reduces people that pay taxes.
Reducing taxes means less government services.

Okay...just overlooking all the rest of the nonsense in this post, let's just take this one snip here. The plan...the liberal plan...is to reduce the population....to reduce the people that pay taxes....to reduce government services....

Liberals...in the end...want to reduce government services...

Why...might I ask...do liberals want to reduce government services? Isn't that something conservatives usually jump on and say liberals want MORE government services???? Doesn't this seem a LITTLE counterintuitive to anyone??

Planned Parenthood started as a means to limit the undesirable people, who the founder stated was minorities. Considering who seeks most abortions, I fear that hasn't changed.

I think many of the dependents are being used as pawns. Right now, their votes are needed to keep radicals in office. Once the transformation of America takes place, those pawns are nothing but a burden.

Liberals often talk about how smart Hitler was and think he had the right idea, but made too many mistakes. So, instead of waiting for the undesirables to mature before killing them, get them while they are in the womb. It's not so horrifying then and they are easier to dispose of.

Liberals want dependents, but would rather not have new ones born. Abortions are encouraged to reduce future burdens and the current focus is on turning average Americans into dependents. Social Security lured the elderly into dependence years ago.

Once the majority helps the radicals take power permanently, Obamacare will be used to eliminate the undesirables, namely the political enemies.

How's that for a theory? If you look back at policies and look where we are headed with the new policies, there is a distinct pattern. Understanding the love liberals have for dictators, it's not to difficult to see what the desired outcome is.

Liberals always argue that the right has been warning about radicals turning us into socialists for years and yet the predictions were wrong. The main reason is because the majority of people have vehemently rejected socialism time and time again. Transforming America wasn't going to be as easy as it was with other countries. We enjoyed freedom and liberty like no other and that is something people don't give up easily. We also had freedom of the press and freedom of speech, along with an understanding of history. We knew what bought other countries down.

The left knew decades ago that killing capitalism was going to be a long term effort, but they have plugged away, year after year. It started with the misnamed 'war on poverty' that was designed to increase the dependent population. The results of the effort have proven that.

In the last decade, we've seen the number of people dependent on government reach nearly half. Many are only partially dependent, but it's a giant step for the left. I suspect that is why the big push in recent years to increase the number of illegal immigrants, who will come with their hands out, waiting for what was promised. To silence opposition, the race card is played daily. Much like dictators in the past, dissenters are treated like they are crazy people who shouldn't be heard.

The left hasn't been shy about expressing their love for dictators, like Chavez and Castro. I've read enough essays on why Hitler was smart but only slightly misguided to make me puke.

It's not a loony conspiracy theory to say where we are clearly heading. History shows that the transformation taking place in America is old hat. We are following a well-worn path to the letter. Anyone familiar with Alinsky or the Cloward-Piven strategy isn't the least surprised about anything going on now. It's been done to death and it's taken many countries to their death.

The left admires those who have successfully turned countries into dictatorships. They praise the dictators for the way they take care of their people and blame anyone but the rulers when the people suffer. Instead of admitting it's a failed effort because dictatorships go again human nature, they think it just needs minor changes to make it work.

Every generation gives us a new crop of wannabe dictators who think they can do better than the last one. It's a mindset that will always be with us and something we should always fight against. Problem is that too many people are in the complacent stage now and they don't have it in them to fight. Too many only know survival thanks to government and the economy doesn't offer hope for realizing the American dream. The time is ripe for the radicals to make their move. We've seen them take big steps the last few years, especially with Obamacare.

The informed people already know how this story will end because we've read many books with the same plot.

One brilliant poster here (please step up and take credit) made a brilliant observation about those being used as pawns by the far left. They are like frogs in a stockpot. They are swimming around and feeling happy because the water is getting nice and warm. I look out at all those with their hands out, willing to cede freedom and liberty for promises and realize that they are content in the warming water.

 

[hangover]

Cons are so stupid. They try to force the poor to have kids they can't afford, then whine about them filling their red states with welfare recipients. The cons claim that they want the government to stay out of other peoples business is bullshit. They also try to tell everybody who they can marry. And freedom of religion only applies if you're THEIR religion.

 

[Edgetho]

Cons are so stupid. They try to force the poor to have kids they can't afford, then whine about them filling their red states with welfare recipients. The cons claim that they want the government to stay out of other peoples business is bullshit. They also try to tell everybody who they can marry. And freedom of religion only applies if you're THEIR religion.

Know what you stupid ******* *****....?

Maybe the 'poor' wouldn't be so ******* poor if they'd settle down and go to work.

But why do that when they can get scumbags like you to vote for other scumbags who are more than willing to steal money from people who DO go to work every day and try to be responsible.

Statistics PROVE a direct link between being single and poor and being married and prosperous.

But I wouldn't expect a stupid **** like you to know that.

Go grease up your obama blow-up doll and get busy.

******* idiot.

It's idiots like you that make me hate dimocraps

 

[Clementine]

Cons are so stupid. They try to force the poor to have kids they can't afford, then whine about them filling their red states with welfare recipients. The cons claim that they want the government to stay out of other peoples business is bullshit. They also try to tell everybody who they can marry. And freedom of religion only applies if you're THEIR religion.

You don't get it, do you?

The whole point is for people to take personal responsibility. If they did, the decisions they make would be in their best interests. Of course, if they did that, they likely wouldn't vote for liberals.

I don't care if people get abortions, though hope no public funds pay for it. No one should be forced to ever fund anything if it goes against their religious beliefs.

The left is trying to control a dependent population from exploding (more than they need it to), but the real truth is that they created the problem in the first place. They wanted people dependent and that meant encouraging stupidity, like quitting school and having babies. They also saw the need to eventually be able to limit that dependent population, so they want a system in place to easily allow them to do that.

Why don't libs ever try to get to the root of the problem? I think it's because it would be proven that their policies helped create many problems. Funny that they have that ability to create a crisis and the nerve to tout themselves as the solution.

Instead of telling people that there are dire consequences for their actions, the left sought to make people feel good about their own stupidity. It's okay to quit school. It's okay to keep having babies out of wedlock. It's okay to have as many abortions as you want. It's okay to live off the tax payers. They've made changes, like the EBT card instead of actual food stamps, to remove the stigma. They want people to be okay being unproductive and they go as far as to blame other people. They make people feel like victims who deserve restitution. Truth is that most are victims of their own stupidity. The left wanted people to feel comfortable making bad choices and now they know that it can't continue on as it has. Too many people will be dependent if this keeps up, so the plan is in place to start curbing it in the future. There has been a special effort the last few years to get women fired up about abortions and free birth control.

Once the dependents serve their purpose, namely electing radicals who will shred the constitution, what will become of them?

 

[Edgetho]

Cons are so stupid. They try to force the poor to have kids they can't afford, then whine about them filling their red states with welfare recipients. The cons claim that they want the government to stay out of other peoples business is bullshit. They also try to tell everybody who they can marry. And freedom of religion only applies if you're THEIR religion.

You don't get it, do you?

The whole point is for people to take personal responsibility. If they did, the decisions they make would be in their best interests. Of course, if they did that, they likely wouldn't vote for liberals.

I don't care if people get abortions, though hope no public funds pay for it. No one should be forced to ever fund anything if it goes against their religious beliefs.

The left is trying to control a dependent population from exploding (more than they need it to), but the real truth is that they created the problem in the first place. They wanted people dependent and that meant encouraging stupidity, like quitting school and having babies. They also saw the need to eventually be able to limit that dependent population, so they want a system in place to easily allow them to do that.

Why don't libs ever try to get to the root of the problem? I think it's because it would be proven that their policies helped create many problems. Funny that they have that ability to create a crisis and the nerve to tout themselves as the solution.

Instead of telling people that there are dire consequences for their actions, the left sought to make people feel good about their own stupidity. It's okay to quit school. It's okay to keep having babies out of wedlock. It's okay to have as many abortions as you want. It's okay to live off the tax payers. They've made changes, like the EBT card instead of actual food stamps, to remove the stigma. They want people to be okay being unproductive and they go as far as to blame other people. They make people feel like victims who deserve restitution. Truth is that most are victims of their own stupidity. The left wanted people to feel comfortable making bad choices and now they know that it can't continue on as it has. Too many people will be dependent if this keeps up, so the plan is in place to start curbing it in the future. There has been a special effort the last few years to get women fired up about abortions and free birth control.

Once the dependents serve their purpose, namely electing radicals who will shred the constitution, what will become of them?

The more dependent and stupid people are, the more likely they are to vote dimocrap.

Outside of the socialist elites, that is. And, IMO, they aren't all that bright either. Just look at how they live..... Like Monkeys in a Tree.

 

[KNB]

Liberals want to reduce the population of Liberals who suck off the government teet? Neo-con fuckwits think this is a bad thing?

It has been made painfully clear that even when presented with their own ideas (Obamneycare, renewing the NSA spying and PATRIOT Act, withdrawing US soldiers from Iraq according to Bush's timeline, 95% of economic gains going to the rich 1% "job creators", etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.), Republican Teabagger FOX viewers will reject it if a black "Dimocrap" is in office.

Conservative monkeys LOVED the big government spying and police state bullshit when Bush signed the USAPATRIOT Act. They called everyone who said it was bullshit a "Commie Liberal Marxist ****** who hates JESUS 'n FREEDOM!!" Now that a Democrat has that power, it's a bad thing and he's a Muslim Kenyan Marxist tyrant. And a BLACK Democrat, too. Oh, it's just so insulting to stupid white hicks who yearn for the good ol' days of the 1800s. Doesn't it just piss you Republicans off? You're only goal for the last 6 years was to make Obama a one-term President and you failed at that because you think that Sarah Palin is smart.

Go **** yourselves, Teabagger Republicans. Rational society is sick of your fundamentalist shit.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Every now and then, I come over and check out threads like these. It is kind of like being on acid and listening to Shirley McClain channel some 10,000 year old man from Pluto....

 

[Clementine]

Liberals want to reduce the population of Liberals who suck off the government teet? Neo-con fuckwits think this is a bad thing?

It has been made painfully clear that even when presented with their own ideas (Obamneycare, renewing the NSA spying and PATRIOT Act, withdrawing US soldiers from Iraq according to Bush's timeline, 95% of economic gains going to the rich 1% "job creators", etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.), Republican Teabagger FOX viewers will reject it if a black "Dimocrap" is in office.

Conservative monkeys LOVED the big government spying and police state bullshit when Bush signed the USAPATRIOT Act. They called everyone who said it was bullshit a "Commie Liberal Marxist ****** who hates JESUS 'n FREEDOM!!" Now that a Democrat has that power, it's a bad thing and he's a Muslim Kenyan Marxist tyrant. And a BLACK Democrat, too. Oh, it's just so insulting to stupid white hicks who yearn for the good ol' days of the 1800s. Doesn't it just piss you Republicans off? You're only goal for the last 6 years was to make Obama a one-term President and you failed at that because you think that Sarah Palin is smart.

Go **** yourselves, Teabagger Republicans. Rational society is sick of your fundamentalist shit.

They want to control the population in many ways. Right now they still need dependents to carry them to power. Eventually, they won't need them anymore and they will be a burden with no purpose.

It's like ensuring you have running water in your house, but at the same time, be able to shut it off when not needed.

 

[KNB]

They want to control the population in many ways. Right now they still need dependents to carry them to power. Eventually, they won't need them anymore and they will be a burden with no purpose.

It's like ensuring you have running water in your house, but at the same time, be able to shut it off when not needed.

Yeah, that makes perfect sense if you don't think about it.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Part of the reason Roe V. Wade, a carefully constructed farce, exists is because the powers that be didn't want lower humans (not my words) to exist. *******, Indians, mongoloids, retards, Hispanics etc. Seems like it was at least partially successful.

 

[KNB]

Are you Republicans actually suggesting that white Republican Conservative Christians want to outlaw abortion so that minorities will have more children? But then those minorities will vote to give themselves free Dimocrap hand-outs taken by force from the innocent glorious white man!

Republicans should be in favor of abortion.

 

[Clementine]

Are you Republicans actually suggesting that white Republican Conservative Christians want to outlaw abortion so that minorities will have more children? But then those minorities will vote to give themselves free Dimocrap hand-outs taken by force from the innocent glorious white man!

Republicans should be in favor of abortion.

It's not Republicans against abortions, it's conservatives. Even religious Dems are against it.

No one wants able-bodied people dependent on government and that is why reforming the welfare system is necessary. It's not working now and people aren't really being helped. It seems to be creating more misery, so time to switch tactics here. Dems keep doing their best to coddle people in hopes that they will not try to become self-sufficient.

People should have all the kids they are able to take care of.