Liberal movie critic on Lone Survivor: Brown people bad, American people good.

[Sallow]

"As the film portrays them [the Navy SEALS], their attitudes to the incredibly complex War on Terror, fought hillside by bloody hillside in the Afghan frontier with both U.S. and Taliban forces contributing to an unconscionably high civilian body count, were simple: Brown people bad, American people good."


Should give everyone a little incite on how these people on the left think. That is what she took away from the movie.

We pretty much understand that liberals think:

All brown people good and all American people bad, so it does not shock me that some pathetic left wing C word would take that from that movie.

Yet, interestingly enough, this stupid typical simplistic, hypocritical C word left winger ignored the fact that muslims saved the recipient of the Medal of Honor, who....was the actual lone survivor.

Look at her typical, stupid, know it all, American hating face.

marcus luttrell is not a recipient of the medal of honor. he is, however, an ass.

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

Interesting.

Do you think Charlie Rangel "earned the right" as well?

 

[JimBowie1958]

I was referring to the post..which made the distinction.

And it's the right that continues to parade around with Confederate flags and call the Civil War the war of northern aggression.

Which has ZERO to do with race, as many Confederates were nonwhite and you know it.

The only people advocating laws based on race are Democrats, the same as it has been for more than two centuries.

Confederates were traitors.

Do you agree with that assessment?

Obviously not as the vast majority of them never took an oath of loyalty to the US government but to their states only.

Not that facts would slow you down from your regional hatred of Southerners, lol.

 

[JimBowie1958]

marcus luttrell is not a recipient of the medal of honor. he is, however, an ass.

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

Interesting.

Do you think Charlie Rangel "earned the right" as well?

Sure do, but if being an ass was all that was wrong with Rangel I would have no problem with the race baiting criminal.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/16/AR2010111604000.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/nyregion/29rangel.html?_r=0

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/05/AR2008090503442.html

 

[Sallow]

Which has ZERO to do with race, as many Confederates were nonwhite and you know it.

The only people advocating laws based on race are Democrats, the same as it has been for more than two centuries.

Confederates were traitors.

Do you agree with that assessment?

Obviously not as the vast majority of them never took an oath of loyalty to the US government but to their states only.

Not that facts would slow you down from your regional hatred of Southerners, lol.

I thought they were "Democrats".



You're kinda all over the map on this one, aren't ya?

 

[Sallow]

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

Interesting.

Do you think Charlie Rangel "earned the right" as well?

Sure do, but if being an ass was all that was wrong with Rangel I would have no problem with the race baiting felon.

What felony did he commit?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Confederates were traitors.

Do you agree with that assessment?

Obviously not as the vast majority of them never took an oath of loyalty to the US government but to their states only.

Not that facts would slow you down from your regional hatred of Southerners, lol.

I thought they were "Democrats".

Lol, they were also Southerners, no?

Apparently all that matters to you is party identification and race. You will turn with the winds for any other considerations? lolol

You're kinda all over the map on this one, aren't ya?

Lol, not me, but YOU, fucking liar.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Interesting.

Do you think Charlie Rangel "earned the right" as well?

Sure do, but if being an ass was all that was wrong with Rangel I would have no problem with the race baiting felon.

What felony did he commit?

I was mistaken. He had no felony convictions, but only a dozen ethics violations, and so I edited my post accordingly before you posted your response.

For all I have read Rangel is a great man personally, but he is a leftwing fascist ideologically, and would probably sign your execution orders reluctantly with great sorrow one day, if it ever came to that.

Not that it would do you any good. Leftists are best at killing their own when they get power.

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

For those of you who have served, why does this surprise you? When Barry and his criminal cronies ran for office in 2008, we heard how they were 'focused on the veterans.' There were even threads on this forum stating how wonderful it will be when Barry takes office because he will then give veterans the benefits and recognition that they deserve. At that time, I made the statement that Barry and his cronies will give good lip service but will ultimately be the WORST thing for the military and veterans that you could imagine. My predictions I am sad to say, are coming true ten fold.

The left (agreed, not all, but generally) HATES the military and it believes that those who have served or are serving their country are somehow mentally deranged. They believe that the United States of America is the focus of evil in the world. Everything that we do is based upon greed, racism, imperialism, or (I'll use my favorite Soviet word here) 'hegemony'. The driving force as to why a person would enlist to serve this nation is as foreign to the writer of this column, and the left in general, as any nomadic tribal ritual in the Sahara. It is more despicable to the writer and the left in general than rape, incest or ethnic cleansing and may be actually the reason for such service.

I volunteered for the US Air Force and went to Vietnam. When I volunteered, I knew where I would go and I understood, even though it was the winding down of the war in '72, what would be waiting for me. Many times, as bullets whipped by, I wondered what in the hell I was doing there. But I believed then as I do now that the freedom that we enjoy is NOT FREE. It is bought and paid for by the blood of those men and women who have paid the ultimate sacrifice and that we owe something back. There are those who have never and will never understand. I feel sorry for them. For those who continue to spout the talking points of Barry's administration and the left, you are becoming as transparent as Nixon at the end of his Presidency. You can keep telling lies all you want, but the proof is in the actions. Tricare, military pensions, the VA and the way they treat veterans, and the list goes on and on.

So a story is finally told in the movies how incredibly courageous these men were. And some two-bit, left wing, whiney liberal SCUM sucking ex porn fluffer from Los Angeles does nothing but disparage these men, tell bold faced lies, and basically rains her ignorant political views in thinly shrouded 'critiques' into the review. Color me not shocked.

If she were on fire, I wouldn't walk across the street to piss on her...

 

[R.C. Christian]

I don't agree with all of what you just said but I'd definitely hold bladder back or just save it until she was no longer on fire.

 

[Sallow]

Obviously not as the vast majority of them never took an oath of loyalty to the US government but to their states only.

Not that facts would slow you down from your regional hatred of Southerners, lol.

I thought they were "Democrats".

Lol, they were also Southerners, no?

Apparently all that matters to you is party identification and race. You will turn with the winds for any other considerations? lolol

You're kinda all over the map on this one, aren't ya?

Lol, not me, but YOU, fucking liar.

You are the one that identified them as Democrats.

I have identified them as traitors.

Learn the distinction.

 

[ogibillm]

"As the film portrays them [the Navy SEALS], their attitudes to the incredibly complex War on Terror, fought hillside by bloody hillside in the Afghan frontier with both U.S. and Taliban forces contributing to an unconscionably high civilian body count, were simple: Brown people bad, American people good."


Should give everyone a little incite on how these people on the left think. That is what she took away from the movie.

We pretty much understand that liberals think:

All brown people good and all American people bad, so it does not shock me that some pathetic left wing C word would take that from that movie.

Yet, interestingly enough, this stupid typical simplistic, hypocritical C word left winger ignored the fact that muslims saved the recipient of the Medal of Honor, who....was the actual lone survivor.

Look at her typical, stupid, know it all, American hating face.

marcus luttrell is not a recipient of the medal of honor. he is, however, an ass.

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

two sentences, one of which is a correction of fact hardly makes for a diatribe. that said, there is no 'might be' to it. he behaves like an ass in interviews and his ghost-written book besmirches an actual medal of honor winner along with numerous other inaccurracies that he has not corrected.

 

[Sallow]

Funny the OP includes no link..and conservative posters here take it at face value.

Wonder if any, who are defending the OP, have even seen the film..

 

[JimBowie1958]

I thought they were "Democrats".

Lol, they were also Southerners, no?

Apparently all that matters to you is party identification and race. You will turn with the winds for any other considerations? lolol

You're kinda all over the map on this one, aren't ya?

Lol, not me, but YOU, fucking liar.

You are the one that identified them as Democrats.

I have identified them as traitors.

Learn the distinction.

Another lie from the Liar.

YOU brought up party affiliation, not me, dumbass.

 

[JimBowie1958]

marcus luttrell is not a recipient of the medal of honor. he is, however, an ass.

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

two sentences, one of which is a correction of fact hardly makes for a diatribe. that said, there is no 'might be' to it. he behaves like an ass in interviews and his ghost-written book besmirches an actual medal of honor winner along with numerous other inaccurracies that he has not corrected.

Lol, hide behind semantical pretzel logic all you want, like 'inaccuracies' = 'disagrees with a libtard opinion', but the fact is HE EARNED IT.

Have you been in a firefight and had some of your closest friends killed?

IF so, you have a right to be an ass; if not, then shut the fuck up, you ungrateful wretch. Were it not for men like him you would be goose stepping and speaking German.

 

[ogibillm]

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

two sentences, one of which is a correction of fact hardly makes for a diatribe. that said, there is no 'might be' to it. he behaves like an ass in interviews and his ghost-written book besmirches an actual medal of honor winner along with numerous other inaccurracies that he has not corrected.

Lol, hide behind semantical pretzel logic all you want, like 'inaccuracies' = 'disagrees with a libtard opinion', but the fact is HE EARNED IT.

Have you been in a firefight and had some of your closest friends killed?

IF so, you have a right to be an ass; if not, then shut the fuck up, you ungrateful wretch. Were it not for men like him you would be goose stepping and speaking German.

i was trying to be nice and crediting the discrepencies between reality and his book to the ghost-writer. but i guess by repeating them that makes luttrell a liar, too.

and funny that you should fail to discuss the attack on the character of lt. michael murphy made in lone survivor. what makes luttrell beyond criticism but not a medal of honor winner?

just because someone has served admirably doesn't make them beyond reproach in all things.

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

marcus luttrell is not a recipient of the medal of honor. he is, however, an ass.

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

two sentences, one of which is a correction of fact hardly makes for a diatribe. that said, there is no 'might be' to it. he behaves like an ass in interviews and his ghost-written book besmirches an actual medal of honor winner along with numerous other inaccurracies that he has not corrected.

I've seen the movie and I've read this piece of shit's entire column. I am in the process of reading the book. I am also trying to find a copy of the citation that accompanied the Medal of Honor that was awarded. She maintains that their were "only ten bad guys and not 200 as indicated in the book or movie." She gets that information from a video that the target made at a time where only 8 - 10 guys were shown in the video next to the target. The number of fighters during the action was revealed in the investigation for the Medal of Honor and should be in the citation. Did she talk with other SEALS or have access to intel to get this information? No, of course not. Is she that stupid? Yeah, I answered my own question.

Marcus Luttrell has every right to be a little 'ticked off' when some mouth-breathing piece of dog shit tries to elude to errors in the story, when their are none. The fact that he didn't write the book himself and instead had a 'ghost writer' is not an issue, unless you have no brains. The man is a SEAL, a warrior. Not a writer. I can imagine why you think he's an ass. Like I said, veterans who have served are deranged, aren't they?

Typical, left wing horse shit. I have nothing but contempt for those who judge something that they themselves wouldn't ever do...

 

[rightwinger]

Makes no sense

In Lone Survivor, the Taliban were bad the SEALS were good

It was the brown people from the local Afghan tribe that rescued and protected the injured SEAL. My walkaway from the movie was how heroic the SEALS are and how not all Afghan people are bad. The Afghan villiage had an honor code and would fight to the death to protect it

 

[ogibillm]

As you are an ass for your diatribe.

He might be an ass, but he has earned the right and you have not.

two sentences, one of which is a correction of fact hardly makes for a diatribe. that said, there is no 'might be' to it. he behaves like an ass in interviews and his ghost-written book besmirches an actual medal of honor winner along with numerous other inaccurracies that he has not corrected.

I've seen the movie and I've read this piece of shit's entire column. I am in the process of reading the book. I am also trying to find a copy of the citation that accompanied the Medal of Honor that was awarded. She maintains that their were "only ten bad guys and not 200 as indicated in the book or movie." She gets that information from a video that the target made at a time where only 8 - 10 guys were shown in the video next to the target. The number of fighters during the action was revealed in the investigation for the Medal of Honor and should be in the citation.

agreed. Official Citation

Did she talk with other SEALS or have access to intel to get this information? No, of course not. Is she that stupid? Yeah, I answered my own question.

Marcus Luttrell has every right to be a little 'ticked off' when some mouth-breathing piece of dog shit tries to elude to errors in the story, when their are none. The fact that he didn't write the book himself and instead had a 'ghost writer' is not an issue, unless you have no brains. The man is a SEAL, a warrior. Not a writer. I can imagine why you think he's an ass. Like I said, veterans who have served are deranged, aren't they?

some are, but veteran status really has little if anything to do with it.

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

Michael Murphy's Citation that accompanied the Medal of Honor.

Citation:
For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty as the leader of a special reconnaissance element with Naval Special Warfare Task Unit Afghanistan on 27 and 28 June 2005. While leading a mission to locate a high-level anti-coalition militia leader, Lieutenant Murphy demonstrated extraordinary heroism in the face of grave danger in the vicinity of Asadabad, Konar Province, Afghanistan. On 28 June 2005, operating in an extremely rugged enemy-controlled area, Lieutenant Murphy’s team was discovered by anti-coalition militia sympathizers, who revealed their position to Taliban fighters. As a result, between 30 and 40 enemy fighters besieged his four-member team. Demonstrating exceptional resolve, Lieutenant Murphy valiantly led his men in engaging the large enemy force. The ensuing fierce firefight resulted in numerous enemy casualties, as well as the wounding of all four members of the team. Ignoring his own wounds and demonstrating exceptional composure, Lieutenant Murphy continued to lead and encourage his men. When the primary communicator fell mortally wounded, Lieutenant Murphy repeatedly attempted to call for assistance for his beleaguered teammates. Realizing the impossibility of communicating in the extreme terrain, and in the face of almost certain death, he fought his way into open terrain to gain a better position to transmit a call. This deliberate, heroic act deprived him of cover, exposing him to direct enemy fire. Finally achieving contact with his headquarters, Lieutenant Murphy maintained his exposed position while he provided his location and requested immediate support for his team. In his final act of bravery, he continued to engage the enemy until he was mortally wounded, gallantly giving his life for his country and for the cause of freedom. By his selfless leadership, courageous actions, and extraordinary devotion to duty, Lieutenant Murphy reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

Makes no sense

In Lone Survivor, the Taliban were bad the SEALS were good

It was the brown people from the local Afghan tribe that rescued and protected the injured SEAL. My walkaway from the movie was how heroic the SEALS are and how not all Afghan people are bad. The Afghan villiage had an honor code and would fight to te death to protect it

I got the same feeling RW. I thought the movie showed how courageous some of the Afghani's were in taking in Luttrell. He says the same thing in interviews.

That is why this dipstick reviewer pissed me off so bad. That and the ridiculous assertions she makes when she has no clue.