Was the attack on the Benghazi Consulate an "Act of Terror"?

[Sallow]

As part of the Senate conclusions:

The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.
Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented - The Washington Post

And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.

Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

 

[Sallow]

Inconvenient truth, eh?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As part of the Senate conclusions:

The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.
Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented - The Washington Post

And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.

Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

So, the video told about the CIA operations and the prisoners?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

As part of the Senate conclusions:

The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.
Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented - The Washington Post

And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.


Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Not sure I understand the OP, attacking a Consulate with CIA people is NOT an '"act of terror"?

 

[OODA_Loop]

What did it say about the movie ?

 

[chikenwing]

Not sure I understand the OP, attacking a Consulate with CIA people is NOT an '"ct of terror"?

Who started this thread and what is his usual MO ? that should clear things up

 

[Sallow]

As part of the Senate conclusions:

The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.
Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented - The Washington Post

And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.


Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

So it's "terrorism" to fight foreign hostiles in your country?

Lets be clear about this.

 

[Sallow]

As part of the Senate conclusions:

The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.
Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented - The Washington Post

And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.

Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

So, the video told about the CIA operations and the prisoners?

Seems your sig is complaining about the CIA, NSA, etc..

Well..why?

Are spies okay now? Or only American Spies?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

As part of the Senate conclusions:



And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.


Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

So it's "terrorism" to fight foreign hostiles in your country?

Lets be clear about this.

Not "terrorism", but I imagine terrifying. At least for the foreign hostiles.

Terrorism is the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

terrorism

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As part of the Senate conclusions:



And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.


Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

So it's "terrorism" to fight foreign hostiles in your country?

Lets be clear about this.

So killing Chris Steven and dragging him through the streets of Benghazi is OK because he was a hostile foreigner?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As part of the Senate conclusions:



And it seems that the annex may have been holding prisoners, which was one of the reasons for the attack.

Given that Libya's government was overthrown by both France and the United States and given that these militants were still involved in fighting off what they perceived as invaders.

Is an attack on a foreign spy headquarters an "Act of Terror"?

Or is it now legitimate for any country to keep spies in diplomatic consulates?

So, the video told about the CIA operations and the prisoners?

Seems your sig is complaining about the CIA, NSA, etc..

Well..why?

Are spies okay now? Or only American Spies?

So, it wasn't wasn't about the video? Obama and Susan Rice lied?

 

[Sallow]

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

So it's "terrorism" to fight foreign hostiles in your country?

Lets be clear about this.

Not "terrorism", but I imagine terrifying. At least for the foreign hostiles.

Terrorism is the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

terrorism

Okay.

So is war terrorism now?

 

[Sallow]

So, the video told about the CIA operations and the prisoners?

Seems your sig is complaining about the CIA, NSA, etc..

Well..why?

Are spies okay now? Or only American Spies?

So, it wasn't wasn't about the video? Obama and Susan Rice lied?

There may have been more than one reason for the attack.

But it's now out in the open that the CIA was in there.

Was that legitimate?

 

[Sallow]

All attacks are terrifying. The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism by terrorist.

So it's "terrorism" to fight foreign hostiles in your country?

Lets be clear about this.

So killing Chris Steven and dragging him through the streets of Benghazi is OK because he was a hostile foreigner?

Okay to whom?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Regardless, the deaths were preventable. The president and his cronies lied about the cause, and LOLberals continue to try and deflect the scandal away and into something else. Such as the OP has done here.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Inconvenient truth, eh?

No, idiotic question and you mention nothing that makes it any less idiotic.

 

[Sallow]

Regardless, the deaths were preventable. The president and his cronies lied about the cause, and LOLberals continue to try and deflect the scandal away and into something else. Such as the OP has done here.

Of course they were "preventable".

Most deaths are "preventable". Like if President George W. Bush never launched an invasion of Iraq based on the lies he told Congress and the American people, 4000 American Military and 100K civilian Iraqis would be enjoying their lives and families.

That's not what this thread is about.

 

[Sallow]

Inconvenient truth, eh?

No, idiotic question and you mention nothing that makes it any less idiotic.

Then you should be able to answer it.

The Geneva Convention does not protect spies.

And no rule or law does either.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Another LOLberal deflection from the topic. Do you ever manage to stay on task, Shallow?
the thread is clearly about defending the scandal. Clearly.