Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,708
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #41
You can't read his FBI file? He and his wife marched annually in the May Day parade. He taught basic Marxism at CPUSA school in Brooklyn, NY.What's the source of your "proof" that Zinn was a member of the Communist Party? It's possible Howard affiliated with members of the party without being a member, is it not?Zinn was a member of the party.Do you have any proof of that claim?Zinn was a communist.Zinn was an anarchist who was determined to reveal the whole truth concerning American Exceptionalism:Howard Zinn was a member of the Communist Party USA and was willing to do anything, write anything, to undermine the true American story of struggle against incredible odds, and strong self-reliance.
"Zinn came to believe that the point of view expressed in traditional history books was often limited. Biographer Martin Duberman noted that when he was asked directly if he was a Marxist, Zinn replied, 'Yes, I'm something of a Marxist.'
"He especially was influenced by the liberating vision of the young Marx in overcoming alienation, and disliked Marx's later dogmatism.
"In later life he moved more toward anarchism.[19]
"He wrote a history textbook, A People's History of the United States, to provide other perspectives on American history. The textbook depicts the struggles of Native Americansagainst European and U.S. conquest and expansion, slaves against slavery, unionists and other workers against capitalists, women against patriarchy, and African-Americans forcivil rights. The book was a finalist for the National Book Award in 1981.[20]
"In the years since the first edition of A People's History was published in 1980, it has been used as an alternative to standard textbooks in many high school and college history courses, and it is one of the most widely known examples of critical pedagogy. The New York Times Book Review stated in 2006 that the book 'routinely sells more than 100,000 copies a year'".[21]
Conservatives are loathe to admit the historical reality that America depended on genocide and slavery to forge its national greatness.
Howard Zinn - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Zinn never defined himself as a "communist" to my knowledge:
"Zinn described himself as 'something of an anarchist, something of a socialist. Maybe ademocratic socialist.'[62][63] He suggested looking at socialism in its full historical context as a popular, positive idea that got a bad name from its association with Soviet Communism.
"In Madison, Wisconsin, in 2009, Zinn said:
"'Let's talk about socialism. I think it's very important to bring back the idea of socialism into the national discussion to where it was at the turn of the [last] century before the Soviet Union gave it a bad name.
"'Socialism had a good name in this country.'
"'Socialism had Eugene Debs. It had Clarence Darrow. It had Mother Jones. It had Emma Goldman.'
"'It had several million people reading socialist newspapers around the country. Socialism basically said, hey, let's have a kinder, gentler society. Let's share things. Let's have an economic system that produces things not because they're profitable for some corporation, but produces things that people need.'
"'People should not be retreating from the word socialism because you have to go beyond capitalism.'"[64]
Howard made people aware of how US capitalism depended upon slavery and genocide during its formative years.
Why do conservatives deny that particular historical reality?
Howard Zinn - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j186/DonaldDouglas/ZinnCapture8-1.jpg
![]()
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/leftist-“historian”-howard-zinn-lied-about-red-ties/