Liberal Extremists Offering Bounties On USSC Justices

[Independent thinker]

FLASHBACK:
Biden claimed Conservatives a bigger threat than Antifa, BLM, liberal domestic terrorists, or even Democrat politicians who have incited 2 assassination attempts, called for violence against USSC Justices, personally threatened USSC Justices, and openly called for Insurrection.

AOC and the WH defend publicly harassing Justices while Liberal Extremists are now offering bounties on the USSC Justices.

ShutDownDC now offering bounties for sightings of Justices Kavanaugh, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Coney Barrett or Roberts

twitchy.com

Biden will be calling them out for this any day now.

 

[Red Front]

Good comeback.

Now that you’ve got that off your chest, do yourself a favor and go learn some history.

People like you always think you can modify human nature and then you're always so mystified when that doesn't work. Communism ALWAYS fails because of that and then you repackage what has failed...give it another name...and try to sell people on it again! Only the truly naive listen to someone like you, CF...the rest of us just laugh at your nonsense!

What is this "human nature" that supposedly makes capitalism the only possible mode of production? Human nature somehow requires the dictatorship of the workplace, the exploitation of human labor, and the exclusive necessity to organize human production around the pursuit of money? What do you think is going to happen to your beloved capitalism when wage-labor is replaced with technology?

Capitalists and their fans resort to cheap polemics when they assert that socialism doesn't work. Their standard for success is quite disingenuous and arbitrary. Success for one nation is not the same for another. If a nation begins with practically nothing and a few decades later becomes the second-largest economy in the world, rivaling a powerful hostile capitalist superpower that had more than a century's headstart, how can you with a straight face assert that was a failure? By what reasonable metric do you dismiss socialism as a failure? The facts are that when socialism is allowed to function without being attacked by capitalist-imperialists, as occurred throughout the history of the USSR and other nations like Cuba, Vietnam..etc, it does very well. Socialism is not communism, it's the process of socializing production from capitalism to communism.

Your demand that socialism must take over capitalism overnight, within just a few years or decades, if it is a viable economic model and mode of production is absurd and silly. Capitalism didn't replace slavery and feudalism overnight. It was a long process of trial and error, successes and failures, victories and defeats before the capitalists beat the monarchs and feudal lords. The merchants and capitalists didn't defeat the kings and nobles overnight, it took centuries. A few hundred years ago the proponents of slavery or feudalism were resorting to the same bullshit arguments that the fans of capitalism use today against socialism:


" Oh capitlaism doesn't work. You guys were defeated by the kings and nobles. Your economic system just doesn't work as you can see. Human nature demands slavery and absolute monarchy. Feudalism is the best we can do now and forever. Capitalism is nothing more than a pipe dream. It will never happen, because human nature won't permit it. Workers have to be enslaved by a master and driven by the whip. That's human nature."

Really? No. You're essentially applying the same faulty logic and arguments against socialism and communism. It will become quite obvious in the near future, that socialism (the socialization and democratization of production) will be the best, if not only solution to the elimination of wage-labor by technology. The capitalists might try giving people a Universal Basic Income to maintain capitalism on life support for a few more decades, creating a fake market with fake paying consumers, but that won't last too long. Production will be forced to re-organize itself, not for monetary gain but for the sake of meeting the needs of consumers. Consumers will always exist, PAYING consumers won't. There's a distinction between paying customers/consumers and simply people who need to consume (eat, clothe themselves..etc). Production will be for the sake of producing what we consume, not for the sake of private capital accumalation or profits. Monetary gain will no longer be the "bottom line", it will be meeting people's needs. Our "bottom line" will change out of necessity.

NO WAGE LABOR = NO PAYING CONSUMERS = NO MARKETS = NO CAPITALISM.







​

 

[Oldestyle]

What is this "human nature" that supposedly makes capitalism the only possible mode of production? Human nature somehow requires the dictatorship of the workplace, the exploitation of human labor, and the exclusive necessity to organize human production around the pursuit of money? What do you think is going to happen to your beloved capitalism when wage-labor is replaced with technology?

Capitalists and their fans resort to cheap polemics when they assert that socialism doesn't work. Their standard for success is quite disingenuous and arbitrary. Success for one nation is not the same for another. If a nation begins with practically nothing and a few decades later becomes the second-largest economy in the world, rivaling a powerful hostile capitalist superpower that had more than a century's headstart, how can you with a straight face assert that was a failure? By what reasonable metric do you dismiss socialism as a failure? The facts are that when socialism is allowed to function without being attacked by capitalist-imperialists, as occurred throughout the history of the USSR and other nations like Cuba, Vietnam..etc, it does very well. Socialism is not communism, it's the process of socializing production from capitalism to communism.

Your demand that socialism must take over capitalism overnight, within just a few years or decades, if it is a viable economic model and mode of production is absurd and silly. Capitalism didn't replace slavery and feudalism overnight. It was a long process of trial and error, successes and failures, victories and defeats before the capitalists beat the monarchs and feudal lords. The merchants and capitalists didn't defeat the kings and nobles overnight, it took centuries. A few hundred years ago the proponents of slavery or feudalism were resorting to the same bullshit arguments that the fans of capitalism use today against socialism:


" Oh capitlaism doesn't work. You guys were defeated by the kings and nobles. Your economic system just doesn't work as you can see. Human nature demands slavery and absolute monarchy. Feudalism is the best we can do now and forever. Capitalism is nothing more than a pipe dream. It will never happen, because human nature won't permit it. Workers have to be enslaved by a master and driven by the whip. That's human nature."

Really? No. You're essentially applying the same faulty logic and arguments against socialism and communism. It will become quite obvious in the near future, that socialism (the socialization and democratization of production) will be the best, if not only solution to the elimination of wage-labor by technology. The capitalists might try giving people a Universal Basic Income to maintain capitalism on life support a few more decades, creating a fake market with fake paying consumers, but that won't last too long. Production will be forced to re-organize itself, not for monetary gain but for the sake of meeting the needs of consumers. Consumers will always exist, PAYING consumers won't. There's a different between paying customers/consumers and simply people who need to consume (eat, clothe themselves..etc). Production will be for the sake of producing what we consume, not for the sake of private capital accumalation or profits. Monetary gain will no longer be the "bottom line", it will be meeting people's needs. Our "bottom line" will change out of necessity.

NO WAGE LABOR = NO PAYING CONSUMERS = NO MARKETS = NO CAPITALISM.









​

With all due respect...what makes Elon Musk the authority on the future of labor and industry?

 

[Red Front]

With all due respect...what makes Elon Musk the authority on the future of labor and industry?

Do you think it's only him that sees the writing on the wall? Technology makes production incredibly efficient, quick, automated, autonomous, and eventually personal, hence paying human beings to do the same job is unnecessary, if not illogical. It's a waste of resources and time. So you and I will work supervising the system, and that entails less work and more freedom. We can work 20 hour weeks, in order to support the system that is providing us with a very high standard of living. Everyone has a home, perhaps two or three homes. The nation's infrastructure is modern, hence we all have plenty of transportation options. Highspeed rail, autonomous electric vehicles, autonomous buses, CityRail..etc. We have our own personal vehicles, we have distribution centers full of products and the system is generous. Each individual can get a new desktop computer once a year and a laptop. Everyone will have the latest devices, be it a smartphone or a cappuccino machine. Technology will allow everyone to have a very high standard of living.

People will gladly work, 20 hours weekly, five days a week, in the field that they choose. There might be some jobs that need to be filled by humans that are unpleasant. Supervising the mining robots, in a mine, 500ft underground. Those who volunteer for that type of work will receive awards, honors, and a special thank you from society. Because most people don't volunteer for that type of work. It takes a special type of person to do that work, so those people are the vanguard of society. The people who are willing to sacrifice to advance humanity to a higher level. Science and technology will continue to develop and eventually no humans will have to supervise the robots on-site, 500 ft under a mountain. It's a process. Evolution is a process, where we gradually acquire more and more dominion over ourselves and the physical world around us. Eventually, humanity will possess full dominion and freedom over life itself and the material world.

​

 

[francoHFW]

Yeah, remember the summer of 2020? Those crazy right wingers sure went nuts burning, looting and murdering.

They weren't even held accountable for all their right wing arson and mayhem!

GTFOH!

Funny how the only spike in violence in fbi stats since trump started is right wingers attacking Jews blacks Browns gays Muslims Jews etcetera etcetera. And the violence doubles every time he has a rally....

 

[scruffy]

You don't have to work? On what planet are you on? Everyone has to do some work. However, the workplace in a socialist cooperative is run democratically, unlike the capitalist workplace, which is run like an absolute dictatorship.

I work for MYSELF, asshole.

Not for you.

 

[Indeependent]

Funny how the only spike in violence in fbi stats since trump started is right wingers attacking Jews blacks Browns gays Muslims Jews etcetera etcetera. And the violence doubles every time he has a rally....

Is that why NYC has Blacks attacking Jews?

 

[francoHFW]

The people pushing the socialist utopia do not go to soup kitchens and other places the same 20 hours a week or more besides their political or other powers. Most of them go to high end dinners and parties hobnobbing with the rich and famous. This is dangerous and we are past the point of infection that seems to be terminal.

BS> Too bad you don't know what socialism is and confuse it with communism like all English speakers do after a century of right wing English speaking UK propaganda.

 

[scruffy]

What is this "human nature"

Yeah.

That says it all.

 

[beautress]

 

[francoHFW]

The right-wing Republicans do the exact same thing. You're all just as violent, if not more so than the Liberals. No one can claim to be peaceful or pacifistic here, so why even continue with this line of argumentation? You're arguing that the left is violent and the right is what? Peaceful? Hehehe sure OK.

Liberals aren't violent. They're civilized pussies.

 

[Red Front]

I work for MYSELF, asshole.

Not for you.

You would be pulling your own weight, by working. Everyone works.

 

[Red Front]

Liberals aren't violent. They're civilized pussies.

Everyone is capable of violence.

 

[francoHFW]

View attachment 669478​

That's funny considering the Republicans are in charge of everything except for Obamacare
The democrats haven't been able to pass a god damn thing since the 60s. We have a giveaway to the rich GOP tax policy and a screw job for everyone else. You have to be a brainwashed fool to not know it.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Funny how the only spike in violence in fbi stats since trump started is right wingers attacking Jews blacks Browns gays Muslims Jews etcetera etcetera. And the violence doubles every time he has a rally....

We've always been at war with Eastasia....

 

[francoHFW]

Everyone is capable of violence.

Libs are great when forced into wars by RW swine/idiots like Hitler and Bush Raygun and Pootler etc. Black rioters aren't Dems or liberals....You should know that in every democracy EVER every Communist Party ever has been for a dictatorship and every socialist party has been for democracy.... Only English speakers and Nazis and commies confuse the 2 like you do...

 

[Red Front]

Libs are great when forced into wars by RW swine/idiots like Hitler and Bush Raygun and Pootler etc. Black rioters aren't Dems or liberals....You should know that in every democracy EVER every Communist Party ever has been for a dictatorship and every socialist party has been for democracy.... Only English speakers and Nazis and commies confuse the 2 like you do...

According to Marx, communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. There's no tyranny there. Socialism is the process that leads to communism. The communist objective and mindset are to be adopted from the very beginning of the revolution and process of the socialization and democratization of production. I call myself a communist because that's the direction and goal of the revolution. I identify with the objective and destination. Technically, I'm a socialist. The term "democratic socialism" is redundant (those who identify as "democratic socialists" are often nothing more than a fifth column in the ranks of the revolution). Socialism is the dictatorship or rule of the proletariat (i.e. working-class). It's the rule of the people. The people dictate, not the kings or fief-lords, not corporations, the oligarchs, capitalists or big money interests. Socialism is the rule of the people, democracy (dictatorship of the proletariat).

 

[francoHFW]

We've always been at war with Eastasia....

anglo-americans? Capitalist swine lol... Anyway, not so much anymore hopefully it's all economic now. I wish we would leave Iran Venezuela etcetera alone. The damn Cold War is over for God's sake. On the other hand the Chinese are coming lol at least economically

 

[francoHFW]

According to Marx, communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. There's no tyranny there. Socialism is the process that leads to communism. The communist objective and mindset are to be adopted from the very beginning of the revolution and process of the socialization and democratization of production. I call myself a communist because that's the direction and goal of the revolution. I identify with the objective and destination. Technically, I'm a socialist. The term "democratic socialism" is redundant (those who identify as "democratic socialists" are often nothing more than a fifth column in the ranks of the revolution). Socialism is the dictatorship or rule of the proletariat (i.e. working-class). It's the rule of the people. The people dictate, not the kings or fief-lords, not corporations, the oligarchs, capitalists or big money interests. Socialism is the rule of the people, democracy (dictatorship of the proletariat).

Nobody wants communism without a gun to their head, that kind of stuff only works in a dictatorship. Soviets did not work as far as democracy in business goes. Socialism is always democratic and is simply fair capitalism. The Socialist Parties stomped the communist parties in every country especially after the fall of the Soviet Union and their support.

 

[SeaMajor7]

anglo-americans? Capitalist swine lol... Anyway, not so much anymore hopefully it's all economic now. I wish we would leave Iran Venezuela etcetera alone. The damn Cold War is over for God's sake. On the other hand the Chinese are coming lol at least economically

What I posted was a reference to the novel 1984.

Everything in the post of yours' I quoted is a direct example of what you believe from the Telescreen. Just complete nonsense you are fed without an ounce of energy put forth by you to apply any critical thinking.

Does what you posted make any logical sense, or reflect reality?

No.