Letter I wrote to Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison

[midcan5]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Here's the truth you miserable moronic fuck, Keith Ellison wasn't on Morning Joe and Joe didn't attack him. Tavis Smiley was on Moroning Joe and Joe did put him and Mika in their places and he did it forcefully and with grit. so go stick you head right back up you big wide ass



Morning Joe



Morning Joe

So you put a link up to Morning Joe and the first face that pops up is, are you ready? KEITH ELLISON! Hilarious. Simply hilarious. I love it. Do it again.

are you on crack? Again? I clicked both links, and the first face to come up was certainly NOT Rep. Ellison.

Here is Ellison...

Here is the first image to show up on the videos...BOTH of them...

Tavis Smiley

Rdean, proving once again that drugs fry your brain.

Deany thinks they all look alike

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yet Kerry campaigned on the fact that Bush failed to secure WMDs at Al Qaqaa, right?

 

[Intense]

A retired CIA official has accused the Bush administration of ignoring intelligence indicating that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and no active nuclear program before the United States-led coalition invaded it, CBS News said Sunday.

Tyler Drumheller, the former highest-ranking CIA officer in Europe, told "60 Minutes" that the administration "chose to ignore" good intelligence, the network said in a posting on its Web site.

Drumheller said that, before the U.S.-led attack on Iraq in 2003, the White House "ignored crucial information" from Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, that indicated Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

Drumheller said that, when then-CIA Director George Tenet told President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other high-ranking officials that Sabri was providing information, his comments were met with excitement that proved short-lived.

"[The source] told us that there were no active weapons of mass destruction programs," Drumheller is quoted as saying. "The [White House] group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested. And we said 'Well, what about the intel?' And they said 'Well, this isn't about intel anymore. This is about regime change.' "Drumheller said the administration officials wanted no more information from Sabri because: "The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy."

CBS said the White House declined to respond to the charge and that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said Sabri was just one source and therefore not reliable.

But Drumheller said it was not unusual for the administration to rely on single-source stories when those stories confirmed what the White House wanted to hear.

He cited a report the CIA received in late 2001 that alleged Iraq had bought 500 tons of uranium-containing compounds from Africa.

"They certainly took information that came from single sources on the yellowcake story and on several other stories with no corroboration at all," he said.

Bush included the reference, which was attributed to the British and turned out to be false, in his 2003 State of the Union Address.

Ex-CIA official: WMD evidence ignored - CNN

http://www.usmessageboard.com/4127423-post8.html
(many thanks, Missourian)

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

That makes it okay for Bush to lie? And I believe Congress gets their intel from the White House.

I believe Congress gets it's intelligence from wherever it wants to.

 

[Truthseeker420]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/4127423-post8.html
(many thanks, Missourian)

That makes it okay for Bush to lie? And I believe Congress gets their intel from the White House.

you should watch the video you fucking moron, you might learn a thing or two about lying and who does it.

I watched your videos and the only thing i learned was the panel was ignorant of the facts or didn't want to call out that punk Joe and make him look stupid.

 

[Intense]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

Can you say Lybia?

 

[Conservative]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

and you're response to the above list of Democrats who said Saddam had WMD's and should be taken out... is?????

 

[daveman]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

and you're response to the above list of Democrats who said Saddam had WMD's and should be taken out... is?????

"Bush went back in time and lied to them!!"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Bush SR took an SR-71 Blackbird trip to phony up the Iraqi Intel because 6% of Scientists are Republicans and Dubya stole the Florida chads, my Precious

 

[Conservative]

Bush SR took an SR-71 Blackbird trip to phony up the Iraqi Intel because 6% of Scientists are Republicans and Dubya stole the Florida chads, my Precious

Florida IS a hanging chad.

 

[WillowTree]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

and you're response to the above list of Democrats who said Saddam had WMD's and should be taken out... is?????

That's was Joe's last and most important shot,,, democrats supported "regime change when a democrat was in the wh, as soon as Bush decided to go in? swoosh, game change,, and that is the sickness that is Washington." or something to that effect.. he kicked their damn partisan asses this morning.

 

[Dot Com]

OMG...

I barfed just a little

Must be a good thread then If you, or the denizens here like you, dislike something, it has a seal of approval for me

 

[WillowTree]

and here's my final question to the dumb ass who started this op,,,, why did you put Muslim congressman" in the title... what's up with that my dummie friend?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

you really ruffled the no truth for me crowd this morning rdean.

Great post!

We are in a sad sad time when so many Americans refuse truth and in its place search high and very low for insults and stiupidity to keep the truth at bay.


I would have repped you but I repped you too recently.

Here's the truth you miserable moronic fuck, Keith Ellison wasn't on Morning Joe and Joe didn't attack him. Tavis Smiley was on Moroning Joe and Joe did put him and Mika in their places and he did it forcefully and with grit. so go stick you head right back up you big wide ass





Morning Joe



Morning Joe

So you put a link up to Morning Joe and the first face that pops up is, are you ready? KEITH ELLISON! Hilarious. Simply hilarious. I love it. Do it again.

You're right. I was Tavis Smiley. But the story stands. Bush lied about Iraq.

Protecting Bush Jr. is slamming both Bush Sr. and the CIA. That can't be denied.

To suggest that Bush Sr., who was president, had been in the military and had been the head of the CIA was so incompetent and inept is crazy. Especially after seeing the fiasco that is his son.

Keith Ellison didn't appear in the video at all.

Can you tell the difference between Tavis and Keith?

 

[AmericanFirst]

you really ruffled the no truth for me crowd this morning rdean.

Great post!

We are in a sad sad time when so many Americans refuse truth and in its place search high and very low for insults and stiupidity to keep the truth at bay.


I would have repped you but I repped you too recently.

I suppose your version of the truth is the usual lies from the left put forth as truth. Idiots.

 

[Sallow]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

Can you say Lybia?

Yes or no.

Was Gaddafi involved in Lockerbie?

Simple enough.

Go.

 

[daveman]

We invaded Iraq because of administration spin
We invaded Iraq because it was a threat to us
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs
We invaded Iraq because they didn't follow UN resolution 1441
We invaded Iraq because they didn't allow UN inspectors
We invaded Iraq because they had ties to Al Qaeda
We invaded Iraq because Saddam was a evil man
We invaded Iraq because of fear after 911
We invaded Iraq to free the Iraqi people
We invaded Iraq to prevent a 'mushroom cloud'
We invaded Iraq to form a democracy in the middle east
We invaded Iraq because fear is a greater power than reason
We invaded Iraq because they had WMDs

No WMDs were ever found in Iraq except in the minds of those who can find imaginary anythings anywhere if it supports their position. And Saddam had no ties with al queda. If one's moral calculus justifies the invasion based on reason, even humanitarian reasons, could we not have invaded a nation where lives may have been saved?

"The release by Wikileaks of some 400,000 pages of official Iraq war documents has ripped the lid finally and forever off what must surely become known as one of the largest lawless actions by a presidential administration in all of American history. The documents prove, beyond all doubt, that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and the rest of them deliberately led this nation down a nearly-unprecedented path of infamy. The only comparable criminal act was the grindhouse of Vietnam, which spanned five presidencies, left millions dead and enshrined the so-called "defense" industry as the biggest money players in the American political game. What was done in and to Iraq has not yet risen to the level of what happened in Southeast Asia, but it is right up there, and the Wikileaks documents hammer this fact home with no remorse and no room left for doubt." [THS] William Rivers Pitt: Now We Know


Iraq Deaths | Just Foreign Policy
Goldberg's War, By Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)
Once Upon a Time...: In Service of the New Fascism
These photos are not for the squeamish Iraq War Casualty Pictures

Can you say Lybia?

Yes or no.

Was Gaddafi involved in Lockerbie?

Simple enough.

Go.

Gadhafi Ordered Lockerbie Bombing, Ex-Minister Claims

 

[OODA_Loop]

Yes or no.

Was Gaddafi involved in Lockerbie?

Simple enough.

Go.

Yes.

 

[Truthseeker420]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/4127423-post8.html
(many thanks, Missourian)

That makes it okay for Bush to lie? And I believe Congress gets their intel from the White House.

I believe Congress gets it's intelligence from wherever it wants to.

sure they can talk to any little birdie on the street but there is procedure and every congress person is not privy to classified info.

 

[Meister]

Congressman Keith Ellison was on Morning Joe. Joe went ballistic when Ellison said Bush Jr. lied to America.

Joe had the nerve and the gall to blame our invasion of Iraq on the brave men and women of the CIA. People who put their lives on the line every day, for this country.

Dear Mr. Ellison,
I thought you did a great job of explaining that Bush "misled" America into Iraq, but there is a point you missed and you did not protect our much maligned CIA. Bush Sr. had not only been head of the CIA, but also led America into Desert Storm. No one knocks an enemy down and then ignores them. After Saddam was chased out of Kuwait back into Iraq, of course the CIA and other American intelligence agencies kept a close watch on Iraq. Morning Joe is insane to think they didn't. You don't turn your back on an enemy, especially after you've given them a black eye. Bush Sr., after being president and head of the CIA and been in the military would know this better than anyone. It think he didn't order close surveillance of Iraq after Desert Storm is ludicrous. No ever remembers to mention that one fact. If Bush wanted to know about Iraq, he should have asked his father. And yes, it is just that simple.

Remember, the Bush Administration outed a covert agent of the CIA because he didn't like hearing the truth. So is it any wonder he blamed Iraq on subordinates?

And after Iraq cost this nation 4,000 young lives, maimed for life more than 30,000 other Americans, and bankrupted our nation, to suggest Bush kept America "safe" is a terrible lie. Remember, he told the nation to "go shopping". Because he didn't want Americans involved in critical thinking pertaining to his fiasco.

The right wing, including Joe, should stop trashing our CIA and President Bush Sr. If Bush Jr. wasn't his idiot son, you know the father would have spoken out long ago.

The right can go crazy protecting Bush Jr. Too bad they don't protect our CIA with same zeal. Remember, it's the CIA who are the heroes here. It's the CIA who puts their lives on the line.

I forwarded this e-mail to Congressman Ellison at:

https://forms.house.gov/ellison/webforms/issue_subscribe.htm

I'm sure the Honorable Keith Ellison's staff knew exactly what to do with your drivel, deen'o. Your name calling usually won't get past the aide that reads the hundreds of emails he gets dailey. I'm sure it was deleted and never was seen on a piece of paper.