Lets Put Hillary and Trump into Global Perspective

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,753
2,220
Neither of them are as bad as what we see int he rest of the world, and I have said that before.

But I want to illustrate this with an analogy.

Suppose we were members of a corporations board of trustees and we had one candidate for CEO that was rude and ruffled feathers, but he had success with turning around other corporations that had been losing money before. And the other was a guy who was a competent CEO but who had friends in very questionable circles that had a reputation for skirting the law to get things done.

I think most people would feel better having the CEO with the rude style but effective policies, rather than take risks with someone who had shady associates.

But either of them could lead the company and none of them would be prone to cannabalizing the company to unmake it entirely.

While I have toned down the extremes quite a bit here, I think the analogy valid, and no one needs to slit their wrists or move to Australia if the other candidate wins.

But if Hillary wins I would recommend divesting from stocks, lol.
 
The US and Russian nuclear arsenals are, essentially, still on hair-trigger alert despite the Cold War having ended over 20 years ago. And the biggest danger in having a belligerent person, like Donald Trump, as Commander-in-Chief of the US Nuclear Arsenal, comes from the potential that such a person would have for unintentionally and accidentally causing the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, against the United States.

I would ask others to take a look at a paper titled ‘Accidental Nuclear War – The Real Danger of a Donald Trump Presidency’ which is posted at www.nucleardanger.org and that discusses this in more detail.
Hitlery would sell them to the highest bidder.....
 
HRC is well respected worldwide.
Trump is a joke who gets paid to put his name on buildings and little else.
You put your name on your panties to feel special? :lol:
What is more illustrative is that leftist ideologues like Candyporn cannot accept their opponents in office no matter what.

As soon as anyone runs against her leftwing favorite, all other candidates become vile, corrupt, stupid and insane.

What she doesnt understand is that she is merely projecting her own mindset onto others.
 
The US and Russian nuclear arsenals are, essentially, still on hair-trigger alert despite the Cold War having ended over 20 years ago. And the biggest danger in having a belligerent person, like Donald Trump, as Commander-in-Chief of the US Nuclear Arsenal, comes from the potential that such a person would have for unintentionally and accidentally causing the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, against the United States.

I would ask others to take a look at a paper titled ‘Accidental Nuclear War – The Real Danger of a Donald Trump Presidency’ which is posted at www.nucleardanger.org and that discusses this in more detail.
Hitlery would sell them to the highest bidder.....
Yep, and look at how leftists really pretend that one can launch an a cidental nuclear strike. We have many redundant safe guards against exactly that sort of thing, but any lie is useful to attack those who stand in the way of their progress toward absolute leftist government control.
 
HRC is well respected worldwide.
Trump is a joke who gets paid to put his name on buildings and little else.
You put your name on your panties to feel special? :lol:
What is more illustrative is that leftist ideologues like Candyporn cannot accept their opponents in office no matter what.

As soon as anyone runs against her leftwing favorite, all other candidates become vile, corrupt, stupid and insane.

What she doesnt understand is that she is merely projecting her own mindset onto others.
And that her mindset is programmed into her by her masters....

It is so sad to see people succumb to the evil that is the fascist democrat party and that they are powerless to defend against it.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top