Let's have a conversation

[hadit]

He's challenging them to debate him. That's it.

He'll say that he "won", they'll say that they "won".

The bottom line is, he was willing to face them head on.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

By maligning it through their ideologies, traditional norms and 'activism'. Like they've done for decades if not centuries.

Kinda like colleges preaching their own ideologies to young people, yes?

 

[BackAgain]

I want to support it.

I read many comments, by many lefties here and prominet Democrats - just about all condemning Kirk's murder.

So what does support look like for you? You want me to start copying and pasting all of that. What do you want exactly?

If you can't answer then you don't know wtf you are asking for, nor do you have any understanding why you actually disagree with it aside from your usual primitive tribalism.

Again, **** you and your claimed desire for support.

Just follow along. Many leftists — but NOBODY on the right — expressed glee and joy about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Trolling college kids isn’t lucrative unless you’re playing to the right wing media crowd.

Saying that Kirk was trolling college kids is "demeaning and intending only to inflame rather than to generate legitimate discussion".

You can't have it both ways.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

But you are racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic and every other name you can imagine.

You need to learn the three "T's" all good writers know, "TIGHT, TAUT, TERSE" instead of v-saying-v

But you are racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic and every other name you can imagine.

Make your life easier and just shorten it to: "YOU'RE RIGHT"

 

[jc456]

View attachment 1162800

yep, my photo

 

[jc456]

I want to support it.

I read many comments, by many lefties here and prominet Democrats - just about all condemning Kirk's murder.

So what does support look like for you? You want me to start copying and pasting all of that. What do you want exactly?

If you can't answer then you don't know wtf you are asking for, nor do you have any understanding why you actually disagree with it aside from your usual primitive tribalism.

well, if you can't acknowledge that demofks dehumanized kirk's unaliving, then you're weak

 

[jc456]

Saying that Kirk was trolling college kids is "demeaning and intending only to inflame rather than to generate legitimate discussion".

You can't have it both ways.

yep, most dehumanizing post in here was his.

 

[MarathonMike]

It’s demeaning and intending only to inflame rather than to generate legitimate discussion.

That’s trolling.

There was nothing demeaning about my reply. You are conditioned to react which is what you are doing now.

 

[jc456]

It’s demeaning and intending only to inflame rather than to generate legitimate discussion.

That’s trolling.

look at the demofk loser trying to control the narrative in here. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ fk off

 

[AntonToo]

Again, **** you and your claimed desire for support.

Just follow along. Many leftists — but NOBODY on the right — expressed glee and joy about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Why would a rightwingers express glee about a rightwinger getting killed?

Yes, there are some lefties stupid and ignorant enough to celebrate or excuse murder, but no they DO NOT REPRESENT THE LEFT AS A WHOLE. Similarly there are rightwingers that celebrate and excuse political violence, and you of course don't draw any conclusions about the right based on that.


Your fundamental fail is one sided grabbing of exceptions to prove the rule.

 

[jc456]

Why would a rightwingers express glee about a rightwinger getting killed?

why would any human? fk you!

 

[BackAgain]

Why would a rightwingers express glee about a rightwinger getting killed?

Why would any thinking or civilized person express glee for that assassination?

Yes, there are some lefties stupid and ignorant enough to celebrate or excuse murder, but no they DO NOT REPRESENT THE LEFT AS A WHOLE.

There are more than a few. And I did not make any claim that they represent the left as a whole. So if you thought you were making a good point, be advised: you weren’t.

Simularly there are rightwingers that celebrate and excuse political violence, and you of course don't draw any conclusions about the right based on that.

I can’t recall any examples of right wingers celebrating and excusing any political violence.

Your fundamental fail is one sided grabbing of exceptions to prove the rule.

False. My fundamental accurate achievement is to state clearly what I mean and exclude universal assertions. You should try that.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

He hired a black woman who was extremely well qualified. All you see is a black woman.

This is a perfect example of intellectual dishonesty. All BIDEN saw was a black woman. He even stated it;

"While I've been studying candidates' backgrounds and writings, I've made no decision except one: the person I nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience and integrity - and that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court. It's long overdue, in my view," Biden said."

 

[AntonToo]

Why would any thinking or civilized person express glee for that assassination?

Because it's against someone they hated...duh.

Were you born yesterday? Because guess what, there are plenty of not-thinking, ignorant people on all sides.

 

[Chuz Life]

yep, my photo

that one was mine. just about same.

 

[IM2]

For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.

No, he didn't. He wanted the very cptulatin you re taing about.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

So was Harris qualified or not? You seem to not want to answer.

Based on the end results, absolutely not. She was in fact SO not qualified that brain dead Biden STILL tried to run for re-election even after the embarrassment of a debate.

 

[IM2]

This is a perfect example of intellectual dishonesty. All BIDEN saw was a black woman. He even stated it;

"While I've been studying candidates' backgrounds and writings, I've made no decision except one: the person I nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience and integrity - and that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court. It's long overdue, in my view," Biden said."

You are wrong. First off, Brown-Jackson was more qualified than the people Trump put on the court. But what Biden did see was that there had never been a black woman appointed to a court that had only saw white men as qualified to determine laws. This is a bit of historic amnesia that the right aways exemplifies in these kinds of discussions.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Your hatered of the left generally is what stands out here, since most of the left pretty clearly condemned the murder.

This includes all, or just about all of prominent Democrats, so it seems that you see what you want to see.

Condemning violence AFTER the violence has occurred is the easy part.