Let's have a conversation

You mentioned moderates in previous post. Would you expand on how you identify moderate views on the left?
I've seen a lot on the left denounce Kirk being assassinated while demonizing him as a fascist/racist in the same sentence. Would you consider this a moderate view?
Referring to someone who, by any objective standard, is not a racist / fascist as a racist / fascist is not moderate.
 
Your hatered of the left generally is what stands out here, since most of the left pretty clearly condemned the murder.

This includes all, or just about all of prominent Democrats, so it seems that you see what you want to see.
Oh Antoinette. Grow up.

I don’t hate the left. I do dispute what they say and the premises from which they make their so-called arguments.

And it isn’t just a political party issue, you bombastic simpleton.

You can continue to deny objective reality all you want. But it isn’t any conservative or Republican who has openly praised the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That has come entirely from the more depraved leftards and Democraps.
 
Last edited:
You mentioned moderates in previous post. Would you expand on how you identify moderate views on the left?
I've seen a lot on the left denounce Kirk being assassinated while demonizing him as a fascist/racist in the same sentence. Would you consider this a moderate view?
No.

Think the saying about broken clocks.
 
I don't agree with that, there are alot, but still most leftwingers don't call him that and understand it as hyperbolic.

Harris did it. Biden did it. That is your leadership.


You are also saying that calling him a Nazi is not just hyperbolic but equates to calling for political violence.

Ok lets accept that standard,

Thank you for your honesty.


but then what I'm saying is that you equally have to apply this standard to the vitriol coming from the right against specific Democrats and the left in general. Otherwise it's very one sided and hypocritical.

Commie does not quite have the same...impact. I have said that when people talk of abortion doctors being baby killers. THat is dangerous rhetoric.



Let me just add to this post something Kirk himself said that certianly fits in this standard of calling for political violence:

The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white. – The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024

Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America. – Charlie Kirk social media post, 8 September 2025

I'm not seeing the... sameness. Try explaining your thinking there more.
 
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
Charlie is right. Obviously.
 
well perhaps you can show us where the rifle was when he got off the roof.


I never got answers to that either.

Was it disassembled (that old heavy gun?)? Thrown off (loaded?). How did it get up there? Stashed before (dead of night?) In the backpack? Who was coming down the stairs in white shirt?
 
Last edited:
For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.

This is what I'm trying to do now, but hopefully it won't wind up being a lost cause.

I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's just because he always was right.

A BS saying the most people like to say but would never do.

The men and women who died for our country would disagree with you if they didn't already make the ultimate sacrifice.

No. Rejected. The time for "conversation" is over. And I DO NOT, and would never, mean that in a violent way. I mean, they only want a "conversation" now because they know they have been utterly crushed.

We wanted to talk years ago and they called us racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic and every other name you can imagine. They hate their own game NOW? Aw

Sadly, I'm afraid that you're correct, but I'm still trying for Charlie.

dimocraps are no longer worth talking to. They are poison. Diseased.

Not only do we have dimocraps in here making excuses and rationalizing the assassination of Charlie Kirk, they are still calling him names and accusing him of being a "Nazi" or a "Fascist" or a homophobe.

The time for talking to dimocrap scum is gone. It is over. It is time we started crushing them by whatever means are necessary. Hopefully non-violent but -- Whatever it takes.

Oh, and the voters? They're the worst of them all. They enable people like Tyler Robinson, they quote scum like Whoopi Goldfarb, they watch the DISGUSTING FILTH and believe every lie they tell.

dimocrap FILTH are beyond redemption. I no longer have any desire to talk to them. At all.

Don't bother. All you'll get is lies. It's all they know how to do. That, and murder.

Again I'm really on the fence here as I really see your point but Charlie would want us to try finding common ground with them.

Yes, they do, hence why I don't favor the arbitrary approach like I used to. My wrath is still the same, but I have learned to temper it.

Amen.

I think the OP is the one who wants to engage in a conversation. Even as he has no expectation that you, I or anyone else will.

I'm currently trying to.

But you are racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic and every other name you can imagine.

So what's name calling going to solve?

It's late for me. I'll be going before I say something I shouldn't.

See you kids tonight!

I'm proud of you. I'm really trying to put my foot in my mouth too as it isn't always easy when it comes to the left.
😆


Kirk was nothing more than a propagandist for the MAGATs.

Do you have anything to back up these claims? I don't think you do, but for some strange reason beyond the realm of my understanding I'm asking you anyways. 🙄

Did you read the article or just the link header?

Why did I read this as did you read the article or is the left just giving you a headache? 🤣

You’re far too old to be so immature.

Here is the truth. Man up and accept it.
View attachment 1162730

Satan is our true enemy.

The First Amendment would like a word, but that doesn't mean much now, does it.

To the left no. Otherwise Charlie Kirk would still be alive right now.

BTW, can a man become a woman? Straight forward question.

Yeah, but you'll never get a straight forward answer.

Geez, I created a monster.

At least you're not one of Tyler Robinson's parents.
 
No. He came to choose her based on merit and make that announcement after consideration a diverse field of candidates.

Unlike Biden.s proclamation it going to be a black woman.

He literally said the opposite.
 
Oh Antoinette. Grow up.

I don’t hate the left. I do dispute what they say and the premises from which they make their so-called arguments.

And it isn’t just a political party issue, you bombastic simpleton.

You can continue to deny objective reality all you want. But Norman’s any conservative or Republican who has openly praised the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That has come entirely from the more depraved leftards and Democraps.

As usual you addressed nothing except to post empty denials in way too many words.

Again, just about all prominent Democrats and large majorities of lefties have condemned the murder.

You clearly ignored all that and just talk about how supposedly astoundly hateful the left is.
 
15th post
Other than GOVERNOR & 90% of Congress & every big city mayor being hard-core leftist puke. Wake up.
Not a leftist among them but some people are easily duped by the establishment into hating the wrong people, so the establishment can continue enriching and empowering itself.
 
This is what I'm trying to do now, but hopefully it won't wind up being a lost cause.



That's just because he always was right.



The men and women who died for our country would disagree with you if they didn't already make the ultimate sacrifice.



Sadly, I'm afraid that you're correct, but I'm still trying for Charlie.



Again I'm really on the fence here as I really see your point but Charlie would want us to try finding common ground with them.



Amen.



I'm currently trying to.



So what's name calling going to solve?



I'm proud of you. I'm really trying to put my foot in my mouth too as it isn't always easy when it comes to the left.
😆




Do you have anything to back up these claims? I don't think you do, but for some strange reason beyond the realm of my understanding I'm asking you anyways. 🙄



Why did I read this as did you read the article or is the left just giving you a headache? 🤣



Satan is our true enemy.



To the left no. Otherwise Charlie Kirk would still be alive right now.



Yeah, but you'll never get a straight forward answer.



At least you're not one of Tyler Robinson's parents.
You asked a question about name calling. Would that include remarks like "democrats hate the country, and want to destroy it?
 
As usual you addressed nothing except to post empty denials in way too many words.

Again, just about all prominent Democrats and large majorities of lefties have condemned the murder.

You clearly ignore all that and just talk about how supposedly astoundly hateful the left is.
The left is hateful and violent. That can't be denied.
 
Back
Top Bottom