Let's face it: there's no good reason to deny the construction of the ballroom.

Jesus you are dumb….the very first sentence.
I should have known you'd be exhausted after reading one sentence. Actually, you didn't even make it to the end of it. Work up your courage and see if you can handle the truth contained in the paragraph after you stopped reading.

The president, however, is exempt from those rules, leaving him free to use the power of the presidency in ways that directly benefit him and his family. Many of the notable examples in Trump’s second term relate to the cryptocurrency sector, now the source of much of the president’s personal wealth. Trump has sought to roll back restrictions on the industry and advance its other priorities while doling out benefits to purchasers of his own cryptocurrency products. These include pardons and other favorable legal treatment for industry moguls and even privileged access to advanced U.S. computer chip technology, which the administration granted to the United Arab Emirates after one of its state-backed companies took a 49 percent stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main cryptocurrency platform.
 
The overblown childishness that he needs to get permission from Congress to build the ballroom—under which there will be doomsday bunkers for the president, his family, and other officials—is on its face basically absurd and definitely politically motivated.

With the largest obstacle being removed immediately via private donations, the only thing left for the opposers to do is drown in TDS and try to pretend that they actually have a legal status behind the arguments that they're making.

Honestly, I don't think anyone who does any serious thinking on the matter is fooled by the political chicanery involved here; and the historical preservationists are reduced to mere idiots in the face of the fact that the old structure is long gone.

Appeals court says Trump White House ballroom construction can proceed for now | CNN Politics https://share.google/NFO2Fv0Rh5tlJFn31

Source: Reuters https://share.google/kDJyVB6EfU1PdOCqv
Jo
It is rather funny that their main reason for being against the ballroom is "historical preservation" even though the supposed "historical" part has already been torn down so, even using their argument, there is nothing left to preserve.
 
I should have known you'd be exhausted after reading one sentence. Actually, you didn't even make it to the end of it. Work up your courage and see if you can handle the truth contained in the paragraph after you stopped reading.

The president, however, is exempt from those rules, leaving him free to use the power of the presidency in ways that directly benefit him and his family. Many of the notable examples in Trump’s second term relate to the cryptocurrency sector, now the source of much of the president’s personal wealth. Trump has sought to roll back restrictions on the industry and advance its other priorities while doling out benefits to purchasers of his own cryptocurrency products. These include pardons and other favorable legal treatment for industry moguls and even privileged access to advanced U.S. computer chip technology, which the administration granted to the United Arab Emirates after one of its state-backed companies took a 49 percent stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main cryptocurrency platform.
Even if that were so, which it’s not, it clearly says he can. So, what point are you trying to make here?
 
Save the neo-Confederate tears for someone who cares, Hoss.
Sorry, it wasn't just Confederate generals.
Thomas Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson was torn down as well.
But this is what happens when communists think they've conquered a country.
They try to erase that country's past by tearing down their statues.

 
Even if that were so, which it’s not, it clearly says he can. So, what point are you trying to make here?
I was prepared for you being too lazy to read what I provided. But not a lack of comprehension for what you read. Here's a pop quiz. What part of the Constitution is violated when a prez receives a financial benefit from a foreign country?

These include pardons and other favorable legal treatment for industry moguls and even privileged access to advanced U.S. computer chip technology, which the administration granted to the United Arab Emirates after one of its state-backed companies took a 49 percent stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main cryptocurrency platform.
 
It is just people being contrarian.

If Trump orders soup with dinner, people will say he is a NAZI because he did not order salad. If he orders salad, they will say he is a NAZI because he did not order soup.
It drives 100% of their "policies"
 
The overblown childishness that he needs to get permission from Congress to build the ballroom—under which there will be doomsday bunkers for the president, his family, and other officials—is on its face basically absurd and definitely politically motivated.

With the largest obstacle being removed immediately via private donations, the only thing left for the opposers to do is drown in TDS and try to pretend that they actually have a legal status behind the arguments that they're making.

Honestly, I don't think anyone who does any serious thinking on the matter is fooled by the political chicanery involved here; and the historical preservationists are reduced to mere idiots in the face of the fact that the old structure is long gone.

Appeals court says Trump White House ballroom construction can proceed for now | CNN Politics https://share.google/NFO2Fv0Rh5tlJFn31

Source: Reuters https://share.google/kDJyVB6EfU1PdOCqv
Jo
Aren't most of the donors foreign countries like Qatar and UAE and Saudi Arabia etc?

This president vs congress....this president might reside in it once construction ends for a year....congress makes decisions on it for all future presidents to come.
 
Last edited:
15th post
You TDS honks are so hilarious.

Do you wake up every morning just ready to be triggered by what the media tells you Trump did?

You do not extend the same tweakage for Democrats doing similar things.

Why do you think that is?

1776003486417.gif


EVERY USMB LEFTY WHEN THEY THINK ABOUT TRUMP
 
It is rather funny that their main reason for being against the ballroom is "historical preservation" even though the supposed "historical" part has already been torn down so, even using their argument, there is nothing left to preserve.
Typical Trump

Just tear it down and say….What are you going to do about it?
 
Last edited:
I was prepared for you being too lazy to read what I provided. But not a lack of comprehension for what you read. Here's a pop quiz. What part of the Constitution is violated when a prez receives a financial benefit from a foreign country?

These include pardons and other favorable legal treatment for industry moguls and even privileged access to advanced U.S. computer chip technology, which the administration granted to the United Arab Emirates after one of its state-backed companies took a 49 percent stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main cryptocurrency platform.
We already know that should Dems take the House, all you people will do is impeach, impeach, impeach...Wasting time and tax dollars to fill some void left in your soul by your pure hatred of Trump...Nothing will get done for the country, just a two year temper tantrum....child.
 
Aren't most of the donors foreign countries like Qatar and UAE and Saudi Arabia etc?

This president vs congress....this president might reside in it once construction ends for a year....congress makes decisions on it for all future presidents to come.
True....but construction continues....
What will they do later? Tear it down?
I doubt that.
 
Back
Top Bottom