Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 91,926
- 83,577
- 3,615
TDS, as predicted.Tearing down public landmarks as a thin pretext for soliciting bribes is a great reason to deny construction.
Nothing on the merits.
Nothing coherent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TDS, as predicted.Tearing down public landmarks as a thin pretext for soliciting bribes is a great reason to deny construction.
TDS, as predicted.What do you mean? Congress appropriated no money for this, Trump tore the White House to shake down billionaires and corporate donors. This is not secret, he hasn't concealed that this "project" just consists of rich people depositing money directly into Trump's pocket.
TDS, as predicted.I think they realize Trump is bullet proof
But they will investigate Trump staff who have been running rampant under the protection of Trump and Republicans
TDS, as predicted.I really hope they don't. Not because he hasn't done things worthy of impeachment. But because Senate R's will never vote to convict. It would give him an opportunity to once again play the victim card.
Better to concentrate on conducting hearings, subpoenaing witnesses, blocking everything he wants to do for the last two years, and reversing everything possible that he's done.
What was the historical significance of this 1942 RENOVATION?Opposing Trump tearing down a historically significant building is correct
As is opposing the construction of a monstrous replacement
TDS, as predicted.You destroyed freaking history
I'm sure it is, for little faggots.....................
.
The ballroom?
Congress doesn't need to fund it.
This has gone over your head? It's already funded by private donors.
.
TDS, as predicted.Trump acts like a real estate developer.
Rather than ask permission, just tear a building down and then they have no choice but to replace it
More TDS with nothing on topic, or coherent.Yikes, the MAGA bot is glitching.
The President need not attended.Last night should prove why we need a secured facility on White House grounds, guarded by the Secret Service 24/7.
Nothing sensible ^ there.More TDS with nothing on topic, or coherent.
So we should allow Democrat lunatics to threaten Trump’s life, and he should stay hidden to avoid it?The President need not attended.
Just put that one on ignore. Not worth the time.So we should allow Democrat lunatics to threaten Trump’s life, and he should stay hidden to avoid it?
Another form of silencing.
^ Projection. The shooter was disaffected Maga, and Maga would silence anyone they did not like.So we should allow Democrat lunatics to threaten Trump’s life, and he should stay hidden to avoid it?
Another form of silencing.
#GOPPrioritiesThe overblown childishness that he needs to get permission from Congress to build the ballroom—under which there will be doomsday bunkers for the president, his family, and other officials—is on its face basically absurd and definitely politically motivated.
With the largest obstacle being removed immediately via private donations, the only thing left for the opposers to do is drown in TDS and try to pretend that they actually have a legal status behind the arguments that they're making.
Honestly, I don't think anyone who does any serious thinking on the matter is fooled by the political chicanery involved here; and the historical preservationists are reduced to mere idiots in the face of the fact that the old structure is long gone.
Appeals court says Trump White House ballroom construction can proceed for now | CNN Politics https://share.google/NFO2Fv0Rh5tlJFn31
Source: Reuters https://share.google/kDJyVB6EfU1PdOCqv
Jo