Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

Trump should be in prison for his many, many crimes. But making friends with the district attorney and later mayor was probably one of the smartest moves he ever made.

This ensured Trump would never be tried in criminal court as he should have been. His prosecutor/mayor friend protected him, and so all Trump has ever had to do when caught breaking the law is pay a fine for his crimes.

So his crimes became bolder and bolder. That's what happens. Moral hazard.

In this case, Trump commmitted fraud. Big fraud. And he was caught and was fined when he should be in jail.

So this is a vindictive nuisance case because Trump wants to punish anyone who exposes him to the world for exactly what he is.



.
Did letitia not commit mortgage and bank fraud?
 
There’s no one in the district with the authority to conduct a grand jury. They’ve installed Sarcone as a special assistant to Bondi but given him all the powers of an officer without bothering with senate confirmation. It’s unprecedented.
LOL Jack Smith
 
Doesn’t matter what she did. You can use an illegally appointed prosecutor to go after her.

Actually, I dont think Ed martins appointment is illegal. Smith was appointed as office if special counsel and operated, pretty much independently. Martin's is different i think as he is operating under the supervision of the doj....I think.
 
Is there any doubt the Founders did not contemplate a prez with the DoJ at his complete disposal to seek revenge against those who would have seen him go to jail?

This must be every convicted criminal's dream. Having the power to command the might of the federal government to punish those who he sees as former threats and adversaries.
You loons went after him for the only reason is, you didn't like him. Now time to pay for the crimes your party committed.
 
Nope. Pam Bondi has no constitutional or legal authority to appoint officers.


600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.

The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and—


(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and


(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.
 
The only thing that is crooked is this bogus investigation. A jury decided that the case against Trump was legit and found him civilly guilty.
And a jury will also be given the chance to do the same thing here. Granted, I doubt it ever gets that far.
 
Sarcone is not confirmed by the Senate.

Am I missing something? Ed martin is the special prosecutor is he not? And if im not mistaken, if he is not an independent counsel, it doesnt require senate confirmation?
 
Yeah good luck with that. The DOJ has no control over James. She can tell the DOJ to go **** themselves with impunity.

Lol...no...if you are subpoenaed by the Justice department, you dont get to tell them to go **** themselves.
 
Showing up us not testifying.

So you think if the person just shows up and says "nope, im not gonna talk", that they says "well geez, she isnt gonna talk, I guess this thing is over, let's all go home".

No, she can refuse to testify, but she just forfeits her ability to tell her side of the story.
 

AG’s have been elected for decades on promises to arrest and charge known criminals.

Trump has been a crook all of his adult life. He was in the middle of a fraud trial when you elected him President the first time.

Trump has publically bragged about bribery, corruption, and sexual assault. And still YOU believe Trump isn’t a crook.

Your faith in this lying crook defies logic
And sanity.
[/QUOTE]

Once again, please link the statementd about trump bragging about bribery, sexual assault, and corruption.
 
15th post
Am I missing something? Ed martin is the special prosecutor is he not? And if im not mistaken, if he is not an independent counsel, it doesnt require senate confirmation?
Congress has not created an office of special prosecutor, so there’s no congressional authority for his position at all.
 
No difference whatsoever except Trump is lifelong criminal and James is the woman who nailed his fat ass for it.

...aaaand then she broke the same laws that she sued trump over.


Talk about poetic justice...
 
Congress has not created an office of special prosecutor, so there’s no congressional authority for his position at all.

There isnt a need to unless the special counsel is going to operate independently.

Also, as in the case that was argued about jack smith, everyone argued that since he was an inferior officer, he didnt require senate approval. Is this not correct? The question basically comes down to, is he a superior or inferior officer.

Smith, it was argued, required senate confirmation because he was given broad powers that allowed him to operate independently, thus making him a superior officers. Martin, being the special prosecutor in this case, is operating under a more limited authority. No?

So, no confirmation would be needed?
 
Bondi will pay the price. She will be in jail after Trump's term ends.
Pardon power! Trump can just preemptively pardon everyone. Precedent is already there
 
Back
Top Bottom