Let us discuss this openly... What exactly IS the "two states solution"?

[P F Tinmore]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

 

[Indeependent]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

 

[Shusha]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

Of course migration of peoples is legal. Why wouldn't it be?

 

[P F Tinmore]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

Of course migration of peoples is legal. Why wouldn't it be?

Apples & oranges.

 

[Indeependent]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

Of course migration of peoples is legal. Why wouldn't it be?

Apples & oranges.

We don't care what your favorite Children's show is, we're discussing the fact that you don't recognize legal transactions.

 

[montelatici]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

 

[montelatici]

More archival data:

A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 | Berman Jewish Policy Archive @ Stanford University

 

[montelatici]

More archival data:

"UNITED​

NATIONS​

A

• 
  General Assembly

A/364
3 September 1947

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF ​

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY​

​

SUPPLEMENT No. 11​

​

UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE​

​

REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY​

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. "

A/364 of 3 September 1947

 

[Indeependent]

The problem is that we don't want THEM. Its not just a matter of land -- its a hostile population of millions

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

Oh, look! Another map without context.

 

[fncceo]

Who are opposed to the Zionist's settler colonial project in Palestine.

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

Oh, look! Another map without context.

Here's some more recent data ...

100% Jewish ... Choke on it.

 

[Indeependent]

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

Oh, look! Another map without context.

Here's some more recent data ...

100% Jewish ... Choke on it.

More maps, baby, more!
Maps are so erotic!

 

[montelatici]

Just the facts in maps, tables and in UN resolutions. LOL You people are hilarious.

 

[Indeependent]

Just the facts in maps, tables and in UN resolutions. LOL You people are hilarious.

Keep bringing up the maps and the UN Resolutions.
You can already see your fan club growing by leaps and bounds in the last few years.

 

[montelatici]

You seem to abhor legal transactions.

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

Oh, look! Another map without context.

Here's some more recent data ...

100% Jewish ... Choke on it.

Of course, we all know the land was stolen from the previous owners, that's nothing new.

 

[Indeependent]

Settler colonialism is legal?

Link?

No jerk wad, buying land is legal.
You and Monty better get together and figure out whose revisionist history is better.

The Jews had bought less than 15% of the land of Palestine by the time of partition. The only revisionism is from you people. The facts are archived at the UN.

Oh, look! Another map without context.

Here's some more recent data ...

100% Jewish ... Choke on it.

Of course, we all know the land was stolen from the previous owners, that's nothing new.

Are you referring to Lebanon being stolen by Syria?

 

[fncceo]

Of course, we all know the land was stolen from the previous owners, that's nothing new.

England ceded the land to the State of Israel. For 500 years before that, the owner of that land was Turkey.

For someone obsessed with History... you don't seem to know much about it.

 

[montelatici]

Of course, we all know the land was stolen from the previous owners, that's nothing new.

England ceded the land to the State of Israel. For 500 years before that, the owner of that land was Turkey.

For someone obsessed with History... you don't seem to know much about it.

Where is there any document that indicates that any land of Palestine was ceded by "England" to the state of Israel? The land was not "England's", or more accurately 'Great Britain's", to cede. Where did you get that preposterous idea? You people haven't a clue about what actually happened, you are conditioned and brainwashed with Zionist propaganda or you just make things up.

Palestine, like certain other territories previously under the sovereignty of the Central Powers, were not ceded. In accordance with Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, Palestine was to be held in trust on behalf of its inhabitants, who were the native Muslims and Christians. The Jews inhabited Europe.


Covenant of the League of Nations:
"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant...."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

 

[P F Tinmore]

The land was not "England's", or more accurately 'Great Britain's", to cede.

That is correct. Britain never annexed or otherwise laid claim on that land. It was not theirs to give away and they did not.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The land was not "England's", or more accurately 'Great Britain's", to cede.

That is correct. Britain never annexed or otherwise laid claim on that land. It was not theirs to give away and they did not.

Great Britain won the land from the Ottoman Empire in World War 1. To the victor go the spoils. And Britain promised the land to both the Jews and the Arabs. The Arabs inherited vast amounts of land and oil from the defunct Ottoman Empire. Considering the special relationship between the Jewish People and the Land of Israel, from where they gave the Bible to half-the-world, the British did not think that the Arabs would begrudge sharing one tiny strip of land out of their vast empire. Boy, were the British wrong about that one!

 

[montelatici]

The land was not "England's", or more accurately 'Great Britain's", to cede.

That is correct. Britain never annexed or otherwise laid claim on that land. It was not theirs to give away and they did not.

Great Britain won the land from the Ottoman Empire in World War 1. To the victor go the spoils. And Britain promised the land to both the Jews and the Arabs. The Arabs inherited vast amounts of land and oil from the defunct Ottoman Empire. Considering the special relationship between the Jewish People and the Land of Israel, from where they gave the Bible to half-the-world, the British did not think that the Arabs would begrudge sharing one tiny strip of land out of their vast empire. Boy, were the British wrong about that one!

The indigenous people have a much more special relationship to the land than colonists from another continent whose ancestors happened to convert to Judaism.